NEW TREASURE Stage3のFurther Reading物語読解｜独自短編2本・心情・伏線・視点24問【全解答】

[1] When Aya joined the school podcast team, she was surprised by how quickly everyone worked. They already had a schedule, a shared folder, and a list of people they hoped to interview. Aya enjoyed editing audio, so she took responsibility for preparing the group’s first episode about local shops. Sota, the newest member, said that he would speak to the owner of a small bakery. He promised to report back on Thursday.

[2] By Wednesday evening, the shared folder contained interviews with a bicycle repairer and a florist, but nothing from Sota. Aya checked again on Thursday morning. There was still no audio file. She began to worry that the group would miss its deadline. At the meeting, she said, ‘We cannot use an interview that no one has recorded.’ Sota looked down at the notebook on his desk. He did not argue, but he did not leave the room either.

[3] After the meeting, the teacher asked Aya whether she had read Sota’s notes. Aya had not noticed the document beside the empty audio folder. It contained a careful list of questions and the baker’s answers. At the top was a sentence in small letters: ‘The owner agreed to an interview but asked us not to record his voice.’ Sota had written his notes during the conversation and then asked the baker to check the quotations he hoped to use.

[4] ‘I thought the missing file meant you had not done the work,’ Aya told Sota later. ‘I should have asked first.’ Sota replied that he should have mentioned the recording request at the meeting. They agreed to use a short written summary in the episode and explain why no audio clip was included. They would also ask the baker to approve the final wording before publication.

[5] The episode took longer to finish than Aya had expected, yet she considered it better than her original plan. A silent folder, she realised, did not always mean that nothing had happened. The next time something seemed missing, she would begin with a question rather than a conclusion.

1. Q1. Ayaがチーム内で担当した仕事は何か。

   解答・本文根拠を表示

   正解・解答例：Editing audio and preparing the first podcast episode.

   本文の根拠：第1段落にaudio編集と初回エピソード準備がある。

2. Q2. Sotaがインタビューする予定だった相手は。

   解答・本文根拠を表示

   正解・解答例：The owner of a small bakery.

   本文の根拠：パン屋の経営者。

3. Q3. Ayaが木曜日の朝に心配したことは。

   解答・本文根拠を表示

   正解・解答例：The group might miss its deadline.

   本文の根拠：音声ファイル不在を作業未実施と結びつけ、締切を心配した。

4. Q4. 会議でAyaはどのような発言をしたか。

   解答・本文根拠を表示

   正解・解答例：We cannot use an interview that no one has recorded.

   本文の根拠：録音のないインタビューは使えない、と述べた。

5. Q5. 録音ファイルがなかった本当の理由は。

   解答・本文根拠を表示

   正解・解答例：The baker had asked not to have his voice recorded.

   本文の根拠：話し手の録音拒否の希望を尊重した。

6. Q6. Sotaは取材内容をどのように保存したか。

   解答・本文根拠を表示

   正解・解答例：He took written notes and asked the baker to check proposed quotations.

   本文の根拠：メモを取り引用予定箇所を確認してもらった。

7. Q7. 教師の質問が重要だったのはなぜか。

   解答・本文根拠を表示

   正解・解答例：It made Aya notice evidence she had overlooked.

   本文の根拠：音声フォルダ以外にノートがあることへ注意を向けた。

8. Q8. Sotaにもできた改善は何か。

   解答・本文根拠を表示

   正解・解答例：He could have explained the recording request at the meeting.

   本文の根拠：本人も情報共有不足を認めている。

9. Q9. 2人が決めた最終的な公開方法は。

   解答・本文根拠を表示

   正解・解答例：Use a written summary, explain the missing audio, and seek approval of final wording.

   本文の根拠：声の録音を無断で使わず、書面要約と説明・本人確認を行う。

10. Q10. 最後のa silent folderは何を象徴するか。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：The absence of a file that Aya wrongly treated as proof of no work.

    本文の根拠：ファイルの不在だけで作業内容を判断してはいけないという学び。

11. Q11. Ayaの態度は物語の前後でどう変わったか。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：She moved from assuming to asking and checking evidence.

    本文の根拠：最初は思い込み、最後は質問して確かめる姿勢へ。

12. Q12. この物語を英語35〜50語で要約する。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：Aya assumed that Sota had not done his interview because no audio file appeared. She later discovered that the interviewee had asked not to be recorded. Aya apologised, and the team decided to publish a checked written summary instead.

    本文の根拠：原因と誤解、修正、解決を含む模範例。

[1] Haruto found the photograph inside a book donated to the community history room. It showed a row of wooden shops beside a river. On the back, someone had written ‘Our town, early spring,’ but there was no year. Haruto recognised the shape of the bridge in the distance and thought the picture might be a hundred years old. He wanted to include it in an exhibition about the town before the railway arrived.

[2] His friend Nao was less certain. ‘If the railway opened in the 1920s, we need proof that the picture was taken earlier,’ she said. Haruto pointed to the old-looking roofs and narrow street. Nao answered that buildings could remain standing for decades. Their teacher suggested looking for details that could be checked independently. The students searched local maps and found that the bridge in the photograph had been rebuilt several times.

[3] While examining a magnified copy, Nao noticed a small sign attached to one shop. Most of its letters were unclear, but she could read the word ‘RADIO’. Haruto wondered whether the word might be part of a shop’s name. He had never seen that sign in the oldest photographs of the area. Still, the students could not establish when the sign had first appeared. The new detail made Haruto less confident, but it did not give them an exact date.

[4] A local archivist examined their notes. She explained that the style of the bridge alone could not identify a year, because parts of the structure had been reused. She recommended comparing photographs from several collections and looking for dated business records. She did not say that Haruto’s guess was impossible. Instead, she asked them to label it as an unconfirmed estimate.

[5] On the day of the exhibition, Haruto placed the photograph beside a short explanation. It read, ‘The location is likely to be this riverfront, but the date has not been confirmed.’ A visitor asked why they had displayed a picture they could not date. Haruto replied, ‘Because the questions it raises are part of our town’s history, too.’ He no longer thought that an old-looking picture had to tell a simple story.

13. Q13. 写真が見つかった場所は。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：Inside a book donated to the community history room.

    本文の根拠：地域史資料室に寄贈された本の中。

14. Q14. 写真の裏面に書かれていた語句は。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：Our town, early spring.

    本文の根拠：季節はあるが年が書かれていない。

15. Q15. Harutoは当初、写真の年代をどう推測したか。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：It might be about a hundred years old.

    本文の根拠：橋と古い建物の外見から推測した。

16. Q16. Naoが慎重だった主な理由は。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：Old-looking buildings and bridges did not prove a date.

    本文の根拠：見た目だけで撮影年を確定できない。

17. Q17. 地図で確認できた橋の情報は。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：The bridge had been rebuilt several times.

    本文の根拠：橋の建て直しが複数回あった。

18. Q18. Naoが店の看板で読めた単語は。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：RADIO.

    本文の根拠：拡大した看板の文字の一部。

19. Q19. 看板の発見によって年が確定したか。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：No.

    本文の根拠：新しい手掛かりでも初出時期は不明。

20. Q20. 資料保存担当者が示した次の調査方法は。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：Compare other photographs and look for dated business records.

    本文の根拠：別資料との照合と日付のある営業記録。

21. Q21. 資料保存担当者はHarutoの推測を完全否定したか。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：No. She called it unconfirmed, not impossible.

    本文の根拠：不確かであることと不可能であることは異なる。

22. Q22. 展示ラベルで確実性を弱める語句を2つ挙げる。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：Likely and has not been confirmed.

    本文の根拠：確からしさと未確認の限定を示す。

23. Q23. 最後のHarutoの発言が表す姿勢は。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：Unanswered questions can be worth sharing if uncertainty is explained.

    本文の根拠：確実性を偽らず問いを共有する価値を認める。

24. Q24. この物語の主題を日本語60字以内で説明する。

    解答・本文根拠を表示

    正解・解答例：例：昔の写真の外見だけで年代を決めず、別の資料で確かめ、不明な点を明示することも歴史研究の大切な過程である。

    本文の根拠：根拠の検証と未確認事項の明示が中心。