英検準2級プラス英作文｜Yes・Noの結論と理由が矛盾するときの独自8テーマ32課題【50〜60語】

Yes, I think schools should provide more after-school study rooms. Students who have noisy homes may find it easier to concentrate in a quiet space. Also, rooms at school can help students use free time before club activities. Schools should examine staffing costs carefully, but those concerns do not remove the potential benefits.

【全文和訳】賛成。家庭が騒がしい生徒は静かな場所で集中しやすくなる。部活動前の空き時間も使える。職員費用を検討する必要はあるが、その課題だけで利点がなくなるわけではない。

【校閲】結論・主な理由・譲歩が論理的につながっている。

No, I do not think students should use smartphones during every lesson. Frequent notifications can interrupt their concentration, and not every activity needs a screen. However, phones may be helpful for checking information or recording observations in certain classes. Teachers should choose when digital tools support the lesson rather than requiring them all the time.

【全文和訳】反対。通知が集中を妨げ、すべての活動に画面は不要。ただし調べものや観測記録には役立つ場合がある。毎回必須にせず授業の目的に応じて使うべきだ。

【校閲】結論・主な理由・譲歩が論理的につながっている。

No, I think ordinary book borrowing should remain free at public libraries. Fees could discourage families with limited money from borrowing books regularly. Libraries also support students who need materials for schoolwork. Although operating costs matter, towns could examine public funding and other sources of support before charging every reader.

【全文和訳】反対。通常の貸出に料金を課すと、予算が限られた家庭が継続利用しにくくなる。学校課題の資料も必要だ。運営費は重要だが全員に課金する前に公的財源などを検討できる。

【校閲】結論・主な理由・譲歩が論理的につながっている。

Yes, I support creating more safe cycling routes. Separate paths can reduce conflicts between bicycles and cars on busy roads. They may also make cycling a practical option for some short journeys. Towns should consider road width and safety before building them, because a poorly designed route could create other problems.

【全文和訳】賛成。分離された経路は車と自転車の衝突の危険を減らし、近距離移動に自転車を選びやすくする。ただし設計が不適切なら別の問題が起き得るため道幅と安全を検討すべきだ。

【校閲】結論・主な理由・譲歩が論理的につながっている。

No, I do not think every homework task should require online submission. Some students share devices with family members or have unstable internet access. Printed assignments can provide a useful alternative. Online tools may be convenient for many learners, but schools should let teachers choose formats that fit different tasks and students.

【全文和訳】全面オンライン提出には反対。端末の共有や通信の不安定さがある家庭もおり、紙の課題は代替案になる。オンラインの便利さは認めつつ、課題や生徒に合う方式を選ぶべきだ。

【校閲】結論・主な理由・譲歩が論理的につながっている。

No, I do not think all city parks need to remain open throughout the night. Some areas may require extra lighting, cleaning, and safety checks during late hours. This could increase costs. Evening access can still help some residents, so towns should consider local needs before choosing suitable opening hours.

【全文和訳】すべての公園を夜通し開く必要はない。照明・清掃・安全点検の費用が増える可能性がある。一方、夕方の利用は一部住民に有益なので地域の状況で開放時間を決めるべきだ。

【校閲】結論・主な理由・譲歩が論理的につながっている。

Yes, schools should allow students to organize some club activities. Planning events can teach cooperation and help students take responsibility for decisions. It also gives them opportunities to solve practical problems with classmates. Teachers should still provide guidance about safety and budgets, but students can learn by managing suitable tasks themselves.

【全文和訳】賛成。行事計画は協力や意思決定の責任を学べる。同級生と実際の問題を解く機会にもなる。安全や予算について教師の支援は必要だが、適切な範囲で生徒が運営する価値がある。

【校閲】結論・主な理由・譲歩が論理的につながっている。

Yes, I think museums should keep printed information as well as digital guides. Some visitors prefer reading captions and may not have suitable devices. Digital guides can offer detailed explanations in additional languages. Providing both formats gives people more ways to learn. Museums should review costs and accessibility when choosing which materials to provide.

【全文和訳】賛成。携帯端末を使わない来館者も紙の説明を読める。デジタル案内は多言語や詳しい解説に役立つ。両方式があれば学び方を選べる。費用と利用しやすさも確認すべきだ。

【校閲】結論・主な理由・譲歩が論理的につながっている。