英検2級の英作文で反対意見を書く方法｜Noの模範解答8題・80〜100語と添削12問

No, I do not think schools should require all homework to be completed online. First, students do not always have the same access to devices and reliable internet connections. Some may have difficulty submitting assignments from home. Second, writing by hand can still be useful for certain activities, such as solving math problems or organizing ideas. Digital assignments are convenient for teachers and students in many situations, but requiring them for every subject could create unnecessary difficulties. I believe schools should allow teachers to choose both digital and paper formats depending on the learning task.

立場：反対。理由A：通信・端末環境の格差。理由B：手書き学習の利点。

添削の注目点：online全廃ではなく、all homeworkを義務化する点に反対する。

I do not think every museum should be required to offer free admission to all visitors. First, museums need money to maintain buildings and protect valuable exhibits. Ticket income may help pay for these important tasks. Second, museums often need funding to prepare new educational programs and special exhibitions. Completely removing admission fees could make such activities difficult for smaller museums. However, reduced tickets for students and free visiting days can improve access. I believe a flexible pricing system is more practical than requiring every museum to be free at all times.

立場：条件付き反対。理由A：建物・展示物の維持費。理由B：質の高い展示への投資。

添削の注目点：一律無料に反対し、学生割引や無料日という代替策も提示。

No, I do not think every junior high school student should have to join a club activity every day. First, students need time for homework, rest, and family responsibilities. A daily requirement may make their schedules too busy. Second, students have different interests and abilities. Some may prefer independent activities such as reading or music practice at home. School clubs can help young people make friends and learn teamwork, so I do not want schools to remove them. However, students should be allowed to decide how often they participate according to their needs.

立場：反対。理由A：家庭・勉強・休息の時間。理由B：生徒ごとに異なる関心。

添削の注目点：部活の価値は認めるが毎日の強制を否定。

I do not think shops should stop accepting cash completely. First, some customers do not have credit cards or smartphones, and they may find digital payments difficult to use. If every shop refused cash, these people could face unnecessary problems. Second, electronic systems sometimes stop working because of network failures or damaged equipment. Cash provides another way to pay in such situations. Digital payments are often fast and convenient, so shops should continue offering them. However, keeping more than one payment option would make shopping easier for different types of customers.

立場：反対。理由A：スマートフォン・カードを持たない客。理由B：通信障害や機器故障への備え。

添削の注目点：デジタル決済には賛成しつつ完全な現金廃止だけを否定。

No, I do not think companies should hold all meetings online. First, some discussions require people to examine physical products or equipment together. For example, engineers may need to check a machine at the same location. Second, face-to-face meetings can help new employees build relationships with colleagues. It may be easier for them to ask questions and understand workplace expectations in person. Online meetings are useful because they reduce travel time and allow people in distant areas to communicate. However, companies should choose the meeting format according to its purpose instead of using one method for everything.

立場：反対。理由A：実物や現場の確認が必要な会議。理由B：初対面の関係構築。

添削の注目点：会議の種類に合わせた併用を提案。

I do not think towns should replace most small parks with parking areas. First, parks give children and other residents places to exercise and relax. Without nearby green spaces, some families would have fewer opportunities to spend time outdoors. Second, even small parks can provide habitats for birds, insects, and plants. Removing them may reduce the amount of nature in crowded neighborhoods. I understand that parking can be important for local shops and visitors. However, towns should first examine other solutions, such as improving public transportation or using existing parking areas more efficiently.

立場：反対。理由A：子ども・住民の休息場所。理由B：植物・生き物の生息環境。

添削の注目点：駐車需要を認めつつ緑地の価値を二面から守る。

I do not think schools should completely ban students from using social media outside school. First, families have different rules about technology, and parents should have a role in deciding how children use their free time. Second, students need to learn how to use online services safely and responsibly. A complete ban may not teach them how to protect personal information or evaluate unreliable posts. Social media can create serious problems, so schools should provide clear guidance about safety and respectful communication. However, education and family cooperation may be more effective than a complete ban.

立場：反対。理由A：学校外の権限と家庭の判断。理由B：適切な利用方法を学ぶ機会。

添削の注目点：SNSの危険性を否定せず全面禁止以外の安全対策を提示。

No, I do not think schools should replace all printed textbooks with digital ones. First, digital devices can run out of battery or stop working, which may interrupt lessons. Printed books do not have this problem. Second, some students find it easier to mark important passages or compare pages in a paper book. Digital textbooks offer useful functions such as audio and search tools, so they should remain part of education. However, teachers should be able to choose paper or digital materials based on the subject and the needs of their students.

立場：反対。理由A：端末の電池・接続トラブル。理由B：学習活動に応じた紙の使いやすさ。

添削の注目点：新技術を否定せず「all」の過剰な一般化に反対。