慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門とするオンライン個別指導塾です。塾長紹介
英検1級リーディング第23セット・独自無料35問です。短文語句空所22問、長文空所補充6問、長文内容一致7問を、全140選択肢と正答根拠、段落別の日本語要点訳、復習手順付きで掲載。語彙から長文まで慶英会オリジナルの非公式問題であり、英検協会の公式過去問ではありません。
英検1級Readingの出題内訳は語句補充22問・長文空所6問・内容一致7問です。英検協会の公式形式を参考に制作しました。ReadingとWritingは合計100分です。独立したデータと主張・関連と因果・観測と予測の違いを重点的に学びます。
初見で解き、根拠を説明する3ステップ
- 語彙：空欄の前後・目的語・意味の細かな違いを見て4択を消去する。
- 空所：逆接・因果・制約を段落全体で検証する。
- 内容一致：本文が実際に述べたことと、支持者・研究者の推測を混同しない。
- 解答を見ずに初見で取り組み、誤答選択肢の理由まで確認する。
第1部｜短文語句空所22問・全88択
Q1. The review panel questioned the ___ of a forecast that relied on data from a single unusually wet season.
A. robustness ／ B. proximity ／ C. redundancy ／ D. novelty
Q2. Officials sought a more ___ explanation of why the revised policy would affect remote households differently.
A. perfunctory ／ B. nuanced ／ C. dogmatic ／ D. obsolete
Q3. The committee rejected the ___ assumption that all first-time users had previously lacked access to the service.
A. tentative ／ B. measurable ／ C. unwarranted ／ D. prudent
Q4. Researchers wanted to determine whether the decline was ___ or merely a short-lived fluctuation.
A. pervasive ／ B. arbitrary ／ C. equitable ／ D. persistent
Q5. The revised proposal would ___ independent inspection before any new bridge section opened to pedestrians.
A. mandate ／ B. condone ／ C. diminish ／ D. evade
Q6. The authorities said the early improvement could not be ___ solely to the new equipment.
A. reimbursed ／ B. attributed ／ C. repudiated ／ D. dispersed
Q7. The city introduced a ___ review process to make contracts easier for small suppliers to understand.
A. opaque ／ B. capricious ／ C. transparent ／ D. arbitrary
Q8. The archive faced ___ restrictions concerning interviews recorded under limited consent agreements.
A. negligible ／ B. incidental ／ C. reversible ／ D. stringent
Q9. The council had to ___ the estimated costs after finding that winter maintenance was excluded.
A. revise ／ B. exonerate ／ C. replicate ／ D. reimburse
Q10. The evaluator highlighted a ___ between the number of bookings and the number of services actually delivered.
A. precedent ／ B. discrepancy ／ C. consensus ／ D. concession
Q11. Engineers regarded the initial figures as ___ until comparisons across several seasons were complete.
A. definitive ／ B. infallible ／ C. provisional ／ D. exhaustive
Q12. A sudden loss of trained staff could ___ the safe operation of the shared laboratory.
A. facilitate ／ B. substantiate ／ C. expedite ／ D. jeopardize
Q13. The municipality promised to ___ residents who had been overlooked in the first online consultation.
A. consult ／ B. segregate ／ C. discourage ／ D. penalize
Q14. The investigation found a ___ weakness in the pilot: all participating schools were located near the city center.
A. minor ／ B. fundamental ／ C. cosmetic ／ D. ceremonial
Q15. Several commentators urged researchers to avoid ___ claims about the health benefits of untested equipment.
A. qualified ／ B. tentative ／ C. sweeping ／ D. restrained
Q16. The agency chose to ___ the expansion until technical support was available in every proposed district.
A. implement ／ B. expedite ／ C. mandate ／ D. defer
Q17. The review was designed to ___ alternative explanations for the unexpected rise in demand.
A. assess ／ B. obliterate ／ C. dismiss ／ D. exempt
Q18. The city’s promised savings were ___ on unusually low repair costs during the first year.
A. immune ／ B. contingent ／ C. hostile ／ D. irrelevant
Q19. A government-funded database should not ___ the privacy of individuals who contributed records.
A. guarantee ／ B. reimburse ／ C. compromise ／ D. alleviate
Q20. An independent reviewer said the report failed to provide ___ evidence for the claimed reduction in waste.
A. anecdotal ／ B. irrelevant ／ C. speculative ／ D. conclusive
Q21. The new process was intended to ___ the costs of repeated administrative errors.
A. curtail ／ B. inflate ／ C. aggravate ／ D. perpetuate
Q22. The final recommendation was deliberately ___ because the research had not included remote communities.
A. categorical ／ B. cautious ／ C. sweeping ／ D. unqualified
第2部｜長文空所補充2篇・計6問
Passage 1｜水上交通の電動化と港湾の充電設備
Paragraph 1. The fictional island county of Bayham proposed introducing small electric ferries to serve short routes between its communities. Officials hoped that quieter vessels would improve passenger comfort and reduce some local emissions. A preliminary simulation predicted lower operating costs, and several council members suggested replacing every existing ferry immediately. Maritime engineers cautioned that the model relied on assumptions about passenger loads, weather, and electricity prices that had not been tested on every route.
Paragraph 2. The county tested one vessel for six months. Its electricity purchases were lower than projected during a mild period, but several sailings were canceled because of unusually calm seasonal demand. Evaluators warned that (23) ____. They collected data on completed trips, charging times, battery condition, and service disruptions. They also interviewed residents who had been unable to travel at their required times.
Paragraph 3. Installing charging equipment created further complications. Different ports had different electrical capacity, while some had limited space for safe passenger access. The county assessed shore power and maintenance needs alongside the price of the vessels. More ferry bookings did not necessarily prove that residents could complete their journeys, particularly if cancellations increased. (24) ____, officials began reporting completed journeys and unmet requests separately from ticket reservations.
Paragraph 4. The trial showed that electric vessels could serve certain short routes under appropriate conditions, but their value depended on reliable charging and safe access. The council chose a phased rollout rather than a universal replacement. The final report argued that electrification should (25) ____.
Q23. Which conclusion fits (23)?
A. lower energy use might partly reflect fewer completed sailings ／ B. every route would have identical operating costs ／ C. seasonal changes could not influence demand ／ D. the vessel had been tested under all possible weather conditions
Q24. What connector best fits (24)?
A. On the contrary ／ B. Consequently ／ C. Similarly ／ D. For example
Q25. Which ending is most appropriate for (25)?
A. eliminate all maintenance expenses immediately ／ B. be approved everywhere on the basis of ticket sales ／ C. depend on verified operating conditions, access, and full costs ／ D. replace existing ports without technical assessments
Passage 2｜学校向け資料データベースの利用格差
Paragraph 1. The fictional regional education authority of Northmill launched an online archive of local historical maps and oral accounts. Planners hoped teachers at smaller schools would have more opportunities to use primary sources. Early reports showed a large increase in downloads, leading some officials to claim that historical understanding had already improved across the region. Researchers warned that downloading a file was different from interpreting it accurately and that some accounts contained uncertain dates or descriptions.
Paragraph 2. The authority introduced learning activities that asked students to compare sources and explain what information was still unknown. Teachers also noted that some schools lacked suitable internet connections and needed printed alternatives. The pilot initially involved schools close to the city, so evaluators concluded that (26) ____. They recommended consulting rural teachers before expanding the program and adding accessible formats for students with different needs.
Paragraph 3. A second trial used both digital and printed materials. Participation increased, but the evaluators examined completed assignments and explanations rather than access statistics alone. Some schools were also implementing a separate history curriculum at the same time. (27) ____, the researchers were careful not to credit every improvement in classroom performance to the archive.
Paragraph 4. At the end of the year, the authority funded additional access support and corrections to uncertain records. It concluded that a shared archive could enrich learning (28) ____. Its report emphasized that accurate interpretation and meaningful participation mattered more than the number of files downloaded.
Q26. What conclusion fits (26)?
A. online access had solved every rural school’s problem ／ B. urban trial results might not apply directly to remote schools ／ C. printed sources were inherently inaccurate ／ D. every date in the archive had been independently verified
Q27. Which connector best fits (27)?
A. Likewise ／ B. For instance ／ C. Therefore ／ D. In contrast to the earlier sentence
Q28. What is the best completion for (28)?
A. because download totals alone prove academic success ／ B. even if source descriptions are misleading ／ C. only if every school abandons printed materials ／ D. when records are reliable and students can actually use them
慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
塾長の経歴・指導方針
中高一貫校の英語・定期テスト・英検の学習状況を整理し、必要な復習の優先順位を考えたい方は、無料体験・学習相談のご案内をご確認ください。最大1か月完全無料体験の対象・回数・担当講師は、お申し込み時にご案内します。
友だち追加後、学年・教材・困っていることと「学習相談希望（ブログ・記事中盤）」をお送りください。LINEを開くだけでは受付は完了しません。LINEを利用できない方はメールでの学習相談も可能です。料金・無料体験の期間と条件はコース・料金・無料体験のご案内でご確認ください。
第3部｜長文内容一致2篇・計7問
Passage 1｜養殖場の水質センサーと食料供給の安定
Paragraph 1. The fictional coastal research cooperative of Moorpoint began testing sensors that could warn fish farmers about changes in water temperature and oxygen levels. Several local producers hoped earlier warnings would help them respond before stressful conditions harmed their stock. After installing the devices, the cooperative received many more alerts than it had during manual sampling. Some supporters described this as proof that the region’s waters were deteriorating and that the program had already reduced losses. Scientists rejected both conclusions as premature: the new equipment measured conditions more frequently, and warnings were not the same as confirmed harmful events.
Paragraph 2. To evaluate the system, researchers compared sensor readings with independent samples and examined how farmers responded to alerts. Some warnings reflected temporary changes that required no intervention. Others coincided with conditions that deserved closer monitoring. The team documented calibration errors and times when devices could not transmit data. It also noted that several pilot farms were near the coast’s main service road and had easy access to trained technicians. Remote operations might face different delays and repair costs, so the sample could not represent every farm in the region.
Paragraph 3. The cooperative experimented with clearer messages distinguishing urgent warnings from uncertain observations. Staff trained farmers to interpret readings and check equipment before taking expensive action. Producers who did not have reliable internet access could receive telephone messages, although these required additional staffing. An evaluator pointed out that improved survival rates might reflect changes in feed, stocking density, or weather as well as the sensors. The project therefore collected information on those factors rather than attributing every improvement to the monitoring system.
Paragraph 4. After two years, some farms reported quicker responses to verified risks, but the cooperative did not claim that sensors alone guaranteed better yields. It expanded selectively where equipment maintenance and communications were reliable. The final report argued that monitoring could support food production when its information was accurate and usable. Its success would be judged by verified incidents, practical decisions, and total costs rather than the number of warnings displayed.
Q29. Why were increased alerts not evidence of worsening water conditions?
A. More frequent monitoring could produce more recorded warnings without more actual harmful events. ／ B. All sensors had stopped working. ／ C. Water temperature never changes near fish farms. ／ D. The cooperative had banned independent sampling.
Q30. What limited the representativeness of the pilot farms?
A. They all lacked access to specialist support. ／ B. They were conveniently located near technicians, unlike some remote operations. ／ C. Every farm used identical feed and stocking density. ／ D. The same conditions existed at every coastal location.
Q31. Why did researchers examine feed and stocking density?
A. These factors determined whether the devices had batteries. ／ B. The cooperative wanted to replace all sensors with food samples. ／ C. They could independently influence fish survival. ／ D. They were required to publish confidential customer records.
Q32. What was the project’s final principle?
A. More warnings always mean better production. ／ B. Every farm should adopt the system without inspection. ／ C. Monitoring eliminates the need for skilled staff. ／ D. Useful, verified information and manageable costs matter more than alert totals.
Passage 2｜公共の道路工事と住民参加の設計
Paragraph 1. The fictional city of Hartmere considered replacing a busy intersection with a redesigned crossing intended to improve pedestrian access. Officials hoped the changes would shorten some walking routes and provide more predictable signals for residents with visual impairments. An initial public consultation received strong support, and several councillors suggested that all major intersections should immediately receive identical designs. However, the survey had mainly been distributed to people who already used that crossing. Transport researchers warned that the experiences of bus passengers, delivery drivers, and residents who avoided the area were not adequately represented.
Paragraph 2. Engineers designed a temporary layout that could be evaluated before permanent construction. The trial included counts of completed crossings, waiting times, and reports of difficult or unsafe movements. Some people found the new signal easier to understand, but others struggled because the tactile guidance was inconsistent with nearby streets. The city consulted accessibility specialists and revised the trial. It also considered the effects on emergency vehicles and bus schedules rather than treating pedestrians as the only users of the transport network.
Paragraph 3. During the trial, pedestrian delays fell on several days, but a nearby construction project had reduced traffic on one of the connecting roads. Evaluators therefore avoided attributing the entire reduction to the new crossing. They compared similar periods and recorded conditions in streets that had not been redesigned. Business owners were invited to report deliveries that became difficult, while residents were asked whether the temporary arrangement made essential destinations easier to reach.
Paragraph 4. After the pilot, Hartmere approved a permanent crossing only after technical checks confirmed appropriate safety and access. The council did not require the same layout everywhere. It published the results alongside unresolved concerns and continued monitoring when the road reopened. Officials concluded that well-designed crossings could improve public space, but success required evidence of safe movement for different users, not simply favorable consultation responses or the number of construction projects completed.
Q33. Why was the original consultation not fully representative?
A. Every resident was randomly selected. ／ B. It primarily reached existing crossing users rather than all affected groups. ／ C. No participants expressed support for the plan. ／ D. Accessibility specialists had already approved every detail.
Q34. What problem emerged in the temporary design?
A. All traffic signals had been removed. ／ B. The crossing did not permit anyone to walk. ／ C. Some tactile guidance differed from neighboring streets and caused confusion. ／ D. Emergency vehicles had been permanently prohibited.
Q35. Why could the reduction in waiting times not be attributed entirely to the crossing?
A. Pedestrian counts had not been recorded. ／ B. All crossing users had changed their destinations. ／ C. No traffic changes occurred nearby. ／ D. Nearby construction had also reduced vehicle traffic.
全35問の正答・理由・語義・段落別要点和訳
語彙22問｜全88選択肢の日本語と正答
Q1：A. robustness — robustness of a forecastは条件が変わっても予測が成立する確かさ。特殊な年のデータだけでは疑問が残る。
A. robustness＝頑健性 ／ B. proximity＝近接性 ／ C. redundancy＝余剰性 ／ D. novelty＝新規性
Q2：B. nuanced — nuanced explanationは一律に断定せず細かい事情を考慮した説明。
A. perfunctory＝おざなりの ／ B. nuanced＝細かな違いを踏まえた ／ C. dogmatic＝独断的な ／ D. obsolete＝時代遅れの
Q3：C. unwarranted — unwarranted assumption＝裏付けがない推定。
A. tentative＝暫定的な ／ B. measurable＝測定可能な ／ C. unwarranted＝根拠のない ／ D. prudent＝慎重な
Q4：D. persistent — persistent declineは一過性ではなく継続する減少。
A. pervasive＝広く存在する ／ B. arbitrary＝恣意的な ／ C. equitable＝公平な ／ D. persistent＝継続的な
Q5：A. mandate — mandate inspection＝検査を必須とする。
A. mandate＝義務づける ／ B. condone＝黙認する ／ C. diminish＝減らす ／ D. evade＝回避する
Q6：B. attributed — attribute A to BはAをBの結果だとみなす。solelyが焦点。
A. reimbursed＝払い戻された ／ B. attributed＝原因として帰された ／ C. repudiated＝否認された ／ D. dispersed＝分散された
Q7：C. transparent — transparent reviewなら基準が公開される。
A. opaque＝不透明な ／ B. capricious＝気まぐれな ／ C. transparent＝透明な ／ D. arbitrary＝恣意的な
Q8：D. stringent — stringent restrictionsは強い制約・保護基準。
A. negligible＝無視できるほど小さい ／ B. incidental＝付随的な ／ C. reversible＝元に戻せる ／ D. stringent＝厳格な
Q9：A. revise — revise estimates＝費用項目の追加を受けて見積もりを直す。
A. revise＝修正する ／ B. exonerate＝容疑を晴らす ／ C. replicate＝再現する ／ D. reimburse＝返済する
Q10：B. discrepancy — discrepancy between A and Bは数字の不一致。
A. precedent＝前例 ／ B. discrepancy＝食い違い ／ C. consensus＝合意 ／ D. concession＝譲歩
Q11：C. provisional — provisional figures＝今後の追加検証で変わる数値。
A. definitive＝最終確定した ／ B. infallible＝誤りのない ／ C. provisional＝暫定的な ／ D. exhaustive＝網羅的な
Q12：D. jeopardize — jeopardize safety/operation＝正常な運用を危うくする。
A. facilitate＝容易にする ／ B. substantiate＝立証する ／ C. expedite＝迅速化する ／ D. jeopardize＝危険にさらす
Q13：A. consult — consult residents＝住民に相談・意見聴取する。
A. consult＝意見を聞く ／ B. segregate＝分離する ／ C. discourage＝思いとどまらせる ／ D. penalize＝罰する
Q14：B. fundamental — fundamental weakness＝代表性を損なう根本的弱点。
A. minor＝軽微な ／ B. fundamental＝根本的な ／ C. cosmetic＝外見上の ／ D. ceremonial＝儀礼的な
Q15：C. sweeping — sweeping claims＝限られた証拠から広く断言する主張。
A. qualified＝留保付きの ／ B. tentative＝暫定的な ／ C. sweeping＝過度に一般化した ／ D. restrained＝抑制された
Q16：D. defer — defer expansion＝条件が整うまで拡大を先送りする。
A. implement＝実施する ／ B. expedite＝急ぐ ／ C. mandate＝義務化する ／ D. defer＝延期する
Q17：A. assess — assess alternatives＝別の説明を検討する。
A. assess＝評価する ／ B. obliterate＝消し去る ／ C. dismiss＝退ける ／ D. exempt＝免除する
Q18：B. contingent — be contingent on＝ある条件に左右される。
A. immune＝影響を受けない ／ B. contingent＝条件付きの ／ C. hostile＝敵対する ／ D. irrelevant＝無関係な
Q19：C. compromise — compromise privacy＝情報保護を損なう。
A. guarantee＝保証する ／ B. reimburse＝補償する ／ C. compromise＝損なう ／ D. alleviate＝和らげる
Q20：D. conclusive — conclusive evidenceは主張の裏付けを確定できる証拠。fail to provideで未確定。
A. anecdotal＝逸話的な ／ B. irrelevant＝無関係な ／ C. speculative＝推測的な ／ D. conclusive＝決定的な
Q21：A. curtail — curtail costs＝費用や損失を削減する。
A. curtail＝抑制する ／ B. inflate＝膨らませる ／ C. aggravate＝悪化させる ／ D. perpetuate＝長引かせる
Q22：B. cautious — cautious recommendation＝標本の限界を踏まえ慎重な提案。
A. categorical＝断定的な ／ B. cautious＝慎重な ／ C. sweeping＝包括的に断定する ／ D. unqualified＝留保のない
長文空所6問｜日本語訳と解答根拠
水上交通の電動化と港湾の充電設備｜段落別要点訳
第1段落：架空のベイハム諸島は短距離フェリーを電動化する案を示した。静かな船と排出量削減を期待したが、試算は旅客数・天候・電力料金の仮定に基づいており全航路に一般化できなかった。
第2段落：半年の試行では電気料金は低かったが、静穏期に運航自体が減っていた。消費量の減少は利用が少なかっただけかもしれないため、航行完了、充電時間、電池の状態、中止便と移動できなかった住民を追跡した。
第3段落：港ごとに充電電力や安全な乗降場所が異なり、設備・保守費が必要だった。予約数は実際に移動できた人数ではなく、キャンセルが増えれば成果を誇張する。実際の運航と未達需要を別に測った。
第4段落：条件が合う短距離路線では有用だったが、全路線での一律置換は見送り、充電・安全・実際のアクセスと総費用を確認して段階的に進めた。
Q23：A. lower energy use might partly reflect fewer completed sailings — 利用の少ない季節は電力消費の見かけの低下を生む。
Q24：B. Consequently — 予約数だけでは移動成果を示せない→完了と未達を別に記録。
Q25：C. depend on verified operating conditions, access, and full costs — 現実の航路条件と費用・アクセスを検証する。
学校向け資料データベースの利用格差｜段落別要点訳
第1段落：架空のノースミル教育当局は地域の古地図・聞き書き資料のオンライン書庫を公開した。ダウンロード数は増えたが、正しく理解されたか不明で、年代が不確かな記録もあった。
第2段落：生徒が資料同士を比較し不明点を説明する課題を導入した。ネット回線の弱い学校には印刷版も必要で、都市部の試行校だけで農村地区へ一般化できなかった。
第3段落：デジタルと紙資料を併用し、ダウンロードより完成した課題と説明の質を調べた。同時に別の歴史カリキュラムも始まっていたため、学習成果すべてを書庫の効果と断定できなかった。
第4段落：アクセス支援と記録の訂正を継続し、正確性・当事者の参加・実学習の成果が確認できるときに書庫は有益と結論した。
Q26：B. urban trial results might not apply directly to remote schools — 都市部の条件を農村地域にそのまま当てはめられない。
Q27：C. Therefore — 別の学習法が同時に始まった→因果の帰属を慎重にする。
Q28：D. when records are reliable and students can actually use them — 信頼できる記録と利用可能性が必要。
長文内容一致7問｜日本語訳と解答根拠
養殖場の水質センサーと食料供給の安定｜段落別要点訳
第1段落：架空のムーアポイント沿岸研究協同組合は養殖場の水温・酸素濃度センサーを試した。警報は増えたが観測回数が増えたためかもしれず、実際の水質悪化や魚の損失削減を証明するものではない。
第2段落：独立採水で値を照合し、警報後の行動を調べた。一時的な変化や誤校正もあり、道路沿いの試行養殖場は専門技術者にすぐ頼れるため、遠隔地を代表しない。
第3段落：緊急警報と不確かな観測を区別する案内を改善し、ネットを使えない場所へ電話でも連絡した。魚の生存率は餌、飼育密度、天候にも左右されるためセンサーの効果だけと断定しない。
第4段落：一部では危険への対応が早まったが、センサーだけで収量増を保証しない。保守と通信が信頼できる場所から拡大し、警報数ではなく確認済みの事象・行動・費用で評価する。
Q29：A. More frequent monitoring could produce more recorded warnings without more actual harmful events. — frequent sampling vs genuine incidence。
Q30：B. They were conveniently located near technicians, unlike some remote operations. — convenience sampling bias。
Q31：C. They could independently influence fish survival. — survival can have other causes。
Q32：D. Useful, verified information and manageable costs matter more than alert totals. — validity and outcome, not alert counts。
公共の道路工事と住民参加の設計｜段落別要点訳
第1段落：架空のハートミア市は歩行者が使いやすい交差点への改修を検討した。既存の利用者から多くの支持が集まったが、バス利用者・配送業者・使いにくくて避ける住民の意見が不足しており、すべての交差点へ同じ設計を導入することは危険だった。
第2段落：仮設の横断歩道で実際の横断完了、待ち時間、危険な動線を測った。信号は分かりやすくなった人もいるが、近隣と異なる点字ブロックに戸惑う人もいた。緊急車両やバスの運行にも配慮した。
第3段落：待ち時間は減ったが、近くの工事により交通量も下がっていたため、交差点変更のみの効果とは断言できない。似た日と変更していない場所で比較し、配送や目的地へのアクセスも調べた。
第4段落：技術検査後に適した地点では改修を認めたが一律導入はしない。多様な利用者の安全・移動が改善したかが重要で、アンケート支持率や工事件数だけでは成果にならない。
Q33：B. It primarily reached existing crossing users rather than all affected groups. — affected nonusers underrepresented。
Q34：C. Some tactile guidance differed from neighboring streets and caused confusion. — inconsistent tactile guidance。
Q35：D. Nearby construction had also reduced vehicle traffic. — other simultaneous intervention。
1週間で誤答を修復する学習計画
- 初日：35問を解答・和訳を隠して初見で解く。
- 2日目：Q1〜22の全88択の日本語と自然な使い方を確認する。
- 3日目：電動フェリーの長文で予約と完了便数の差を説明する。
- 4日目：歴史資料の長文でダウンロード数と理解を区別する。
- 5日目：養殖センサーの長文で警報と現実の水質変化を区別する。
- 6日目：交差点工事の長文で同時進行の別工事の影響を確認する。
- 7日目：間違えた設問を根拠付きで再解答し、次の未使用セットへ進む。
よくある質問
英検1級Readingは合計35問ですか？
はい。現行の公式形式は語彙22問、長文空所6問、内容一致7問で合計35問です。
この記事の長文和訳は全文の逐語訳ですか？
段落ごとに主旨を示した要点和訳です。英文の一語一句を訳したものではありません。初見では訳を見ずに解答してください。
次に使う英検1級無料教材
最新の続編・無料教材：Reading第24セット｜独自35問・全140択・要点和訳。直前セットで間違えた内容を復習し、新しい初見問題に進んでください。慶英会独自の非公式演習です。
慶英会では語彙・長文読解・Writingの弱点を個別に確認します。最大1か月無料体験・学習相談はこちら。
公式の試験形式：日本英語検定協会・英検1級の試験内容。英文・問題・和訳・解答は慶英会の独自創作です。
最大1か月完全無料体験・学習相談受付中
最大1か月の完全無料体験をご案内
学校教材・学力・目標に合わせた個別指導
入塾前に授業の進め方や講師との相性をお確かめください。
学校英語・定期テスト・英検の学習相談にも対応します。
保護者様の教育相談も無料で承ります。
1.学年 2. 学習目標 3.体験ご希望をお送りください。
体験の期間・回数・担当講師・日程は、ご希望と受付状況を確認してご案内します。
慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級。中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門としています。塾長の経歴・指導方針を確認する