慶英会 トップへ

英検1級リーディング35問【第24セット・無料】|語彙22・空所6・内容一致7と全140択の解説

編集・運営:慶英会公式ブログ(運営・編集方針)

慶英会塾長のプロフィール写真

慶英会 塾長|慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門とするオンライン個別指導塾です。塾長紹介

最大1か月完全無料体験・学習相談(Web)|公式LINEで相談|料金・無料体験の条件

慶英会塾長のプロフィール写真

慶英会 塾長|慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門とするオンライン個別指導塾です。塾長紹介

最大1か月完全無料体験・学習相談(Web)|公式LINEで相談|料金・無料体験の条件

英検1級Reading・無料独自第24セットです。短文語句空所補充22問、長文空所6問、長文内容一致7問の35問・全140択を、慶英会オリジナルの英文・解答・解説・段落別の日本語要点訳付きで掲載します。今回は資料の解釈、温度観測、法的な手続案内など、表面的な数字より根拠の正確さを読む練習です。英検協会の公式過去問ではありません。

英検協会公式の1級の試験内容によると、Readingは語句空所22・長文空所6・内容一致7の合計35問です。ReadingとWritingは合計100分。内容一致では短めの読解3問と長い読解4問の構成を参考にした慶英会独自問題です。

全35問を使って身につけること

  • 語彙は正答以外の選択肢も日本語の意味を押さえ、前置詞や目的語の相性を確認する。
  • 長文空所6問は前段落の事実と、次の結論の論理関係を読む。
  • 内容一致7問は原資料・観測結果・推論・筆者の最終判断を区別する。
  • 初見で解答し、後から要点和訳と根拠の位置を照合して誤答を直す。

第1部|独自語彙22問(全88択)

Q1. The review found that the committee had ___ two separate measurements, making its conclusion unreliable.

A. corroborated / B. delineated / C. conflated / D. replicated

Q2. The agency created an appeal procedure to ___ decisions made using inaccurate records.

A. rectify / B. perpetuate / C. expedite / D. obscure

Q3. Although the village supported the project, engineers considered a full opening ___ until the foundation was inspected.

A. inconsequential / B. unanimous / C. impartial / D. premature

Q4. The historian urged students to ___ the authenticity of a document before citing it as primary evidence.

A. reimburse / B. ascertain / C. evade / D. disperse

Q5. Several council members warned that the funding arrangements might ___ existing inequalities between urban and rural schools.

A. alleviate / B. preclude / C. reconcile / D. entrench

Q6. The unexpected repair costs ___ much of the financial advantage predicted in the original proposal.

A. substantiated / B. eroded / C. conferred / D. expedited

Q7. The director agreed to ___ the misleading assertion after independent figures became available.

A. retract / B. reiterate / C. vindicate / D. disseminate

Q8. The regional authority wanted to ___ the impact of heavy rainfall from that of its drainage repairs.

A. magnify / B. perpetuate / C. disentangle / D. condone

Q9. The committee described the evidence as ___ because the study had not included the most remote settlements.

A. unequivocal / B. exhaustive / C. incomplete / D. definitive

Q10. A court determined that the contractor was ___ for damage caused by its failure to follow mandatory safety procedures.

A. liable / B. exempt / C. eligible / D. contingent

Q11. The curator said the archive must not ___ consent obtained for preservation as permission for unrestricted publication.

A. corroborate / B. ratify / C. relinquish / D. misconstrue

Q12. The regulator requested a more ___ account of the energy calculations, including assumptions and omitted expenses.

A. arbitrary / B. transparent / C. perfunctory / D. obsolescent

Q13. New inspections may ___ the possibility that some sensors are producing false alarms.

A. rule out / B. stem from / C. give rise to / D. fall through

Q14. The proposed subsidy remained ___ on an independent assessment of its long-term operating costs.

A. immune / B. indifferent / C. contingent / D. hostile

Q15. The officials were criticized for drawing ___ conclusions from an experiment lasting only six days.

A. provisional / B. sweeping / C. qualified / D. modest

Q16. The emergency agency promised to ___ essential services even when ordinary communication networks failed.

A. revoke / B. exacerbate / C. implicate / D. sustain

Q17. The evaluation team found a significant ___ between the number of reservations and completed appointments.

A. precedent / B. concession / C. discrepancy / D. dividend

Q18. The final guidance required agencies to ___ potential conflicts of interest before awarding contracts.

A. disclose / B. suppress / C. reimburse / D. circumvent

Q19. The annual budget should ___ the costs of training staff to operate and maintain the new equipment.

A. phase out / B. account for / C. brush aside / D. run into

Q20. The investigators considered the original sample ___ because it consisted entirely of frequent museum visitors.

A. impartial / B. comprehensive / C. randomized / D. unrepresentative

Q21. The city chose to ___ the introduction of the new software until technicians completed the security assessment.

A. defer / B. facilitate / C. mandate / D. expedite

Q22. The committee requested ___ measurements that could be checked by specialists outside the project.

A. ambiguous / B. anecdotal / C. verifiable / D. proprietary

第2部|長文空所2篇・合計6問

Passage 1|古い手稿の電子公開と解釈上の注意

Paragraph 1. The fictional Portmore Archive received a collection of letters written by local merchants in the nineteenth century. Staff hoped digitization would make the material available to schools that could not visit the original building. After the first images were uploaded, online visits rose sharply. The archive director argued that the increase demonstrated that local historical understanding had improved. Researchers responded that a download did not reveal whether a reader understood the letter, noticed a disputed translation, or confused an uncertain date with a verified one.

Paragraph 2. Before expanding the project, historians examined the handwritten text and compared several accounts of the same event. They found that some names had been transcribed differently in older catalogs. In addition, a few letters contained information concerning families whose descendants were still living. The archive therefore decided that (23) ____. Descriptions of uncertain passages would be made explicit, and material requiring additional permission would be withheld from unrestricted release.

Paragraph 3. Educators introduced short exercises that asked students to compare primary sources rather than copy a single interpretation. They also provided printed excerpts for classrooms with unreliable internet connections. The team tracked the quality of students’ explanations but did not treat initial enthusiasm as proof of lasting learning. (24) ____, the director revised the project targets to include accuracy, accessibility, and appropriate permissions as well as the number of items made available.

Paragraph 4. After a year, the archive continued publishing reviewed materials while retaining original records for future examination. The program did not guarantee that every transcription would be final. Officials concluded that digital access could be valuable (25) ____.

Q23. Which phrase completes (23)?

A. every letter should be posted without checking ownership / B. no educational use of archival documents was possible / C. context and publication rights needed further review / D. download totals were sufficient to measure understanding

Q24. Which transition best introduces (24)?

A. Consequently / B. On the other hand / C. Similarly / D. In contrast

Q25. Which ending best completes (25)?

A. even if sensitive information was distributed indiscriminately / B. as long as reliable interpretations and legitimate rights were respected / C. because all historical evidence could be made certain / D. only when every archive ceased maintaining original documents

Passage 2|小規模都市の気温観測所と設置場所の偏り

Paragraph 1. The fictional town of Northwell installed inexpensive temperature sensors to identify locations that became especially warm during summer. Officials wanted to learn whether additional shade or other measures could improve comfort near schools and public transport stops. An early report showed a higher average reading than data from the town’s older weather station. Several council members immediately described the difference as evidence that the entire region had become warmer.

Paragraph 2. Scientists noted that many new sensors had been attached to walls beside busy roads, while the older station was surrounded by grass. The different environments could influence measurements. Some devices were also exposed directly to afternoon sunlight. Researchers explained that (26) ____. They began checking calibration and comparing readings under consistent conditions before attributing differences to regional climate change.

Paragraph 3. The town also asked residents how they experienced public spaces during hot weather. Yet those who could attend public meetings were not necessarily representative of people who worked long hours or found travel difficult. (27) ____, the researchers added telephone interviews and conducted observations in less accessible areas. They looked at both measured temperatures and whether people could reach shaded waiting places safely.

Paragraph 4. After the review, the council installed temporary shade at selected sites with verified need. It rejected a requirement to use identical equipment everywhere. The final report concluded that observations could guide local investment (28) ____, rather than simply treating a larger volume of sensor data as proof that a particular policy would succeed.

Q26. What fits (26)?

A. the new devices had already proved regional warming / B. the old weather station was necessarily defective / C. different sites never affect temperature readings / D. sensor placement could explain part of the difference

Q27. Which transition fits (27)?

A. For example / B. Nevertheless / C. Therefore / D. Likewise

Q28. What best completes (28)?

A. if methods, locations, and residents’ practical access were checked / B. because every reading was automatically comparable / C. provided all residents attended council meetings / D. only after existing temperature records were destroyed

慶英会塾長のプロフィール写真

慶英会 塾長|慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
塾長の経歴・指導方針

中高一貫校の英語・定期テスト・英検の学習状況を整理し、必要な復習の優先順位を考えたい方は、無料体験・学習相談のご案内をご確認ください。最大1か月完全無料体験の対象・回数・担当講師は、お申し込み時にご案内します。

友だち追加後、学年・教材・困っていることと「学習相談希望(ブログ・記事中盤)」をお送りください。LINEを開くだけでは受付は完了しません。LINEを利用できない方はメールでの学習相談も可能です。料金・無料体験の期間と条件はコース・料金・無料体験のご案内でご確認ください。

第3部|長文内容一致2篇・合計7問

Passage 1|古代の木材を年代測定する研究と解釈の限界

Paragraph 1. The fictional university of Westmere began a study of wooden objects recovered from a river settlement. Researchers hoped the collection would clarify when certain buildings had been used and how construction practices had changed. A preliminary report received considerable attention after one sample was assigned an earlier date than historians had expected. Some commentators announced that the finding overturned the entire history of the region. The project leader warned that the sample came from a single object and did not establish when every building had been constructed.

Paragraph 2. Specialists compared the wood with other materials found nearby and examined whether the object could have been reused after its original manufacture. Several pieces had been exposed to water for long periods, creating difficulties in determining where they originally belonged. The team documented these uncertainties and tested additional samples in separate laboratories. It also consulted historians who had studied written records from the surrounding region, although those documents covered different kinds of events and could not provide a straightforward date for each structure.

Paragraph 3. The new measurements were not identical, but they fell within ranges that could be interpreted consistently when the samples’ histories were considered. Researchers explained that uncertainty in dating should not be treated as evidence of scientific failure. Instead, it defined the range of conclusions supported by the available material. They also noted that extensive public attention could encourage institutions to overstate findings before peer review was complete.

Paragraph 4. After two years, the team revised some local interpretations while retaining others. It prepared an online exhibition showing which claims were supported by multiple sources and which remained hypotheses. The final report emphasized that careful historical reconstruction combined several independent forms of evidence rather than relying on a single dramatic date. The value of the study was in refining explanations, not producing the most attention-grabbing announcement.

Q29. Why did the leader challenge the initial public interpretation?

A. All objects had been found in modern buildings. / B. The regional history had already been fully rewritten. / C. A date from one object could not establish the age of every building. / D. The wooden objects contained no useful information.

Q30. What possibility complicated interpreting the wooden objects?

A. The wood might have been reused and displaced from its original context. / B. Every piece was manufactured in the same year. / C. The written records precisely dated every structure. / D. All samples had been kept dry and undisturbed.

Q31. What did the researchers say about uncertainty?

A. It always proves the experiment was fraudulent. / B. It helps indicate the limits of what evidence supports. / C. It should be concealed until every object is dated. / D. It makes all historical inquiry worthless.

Q32. What was the study’s final approach?

A. Prioritize the most dramatic single measurement. / B. Treat media interest as confirmation. / C. Ignore different types of evidence. / D. Combine independent evidence and distinguish findings from hypotheses.

Passage 2|地域の法的支援案内と申請完了率

Paragraph 1. The fictional county of Fairbourne introduced a free advice desk to explain common administrative appeals. Staff helped residents understand deadlines, required documents, and where to find appropriate professional assistance. The desk did not provide legal representation or determine the outcome of any appeal. During the first month, the number of appointments exceeded expectations. Some officials called this proof that residents’ legal problems were being resolved more effectively. An independent evaluator observed that an appointment might end without a completed application, and that filing a form did not guarantee a favorable decision.

Paragraph 2. The evaluator reviewed whether residents could understand written instructions, reach the office, and obtain help in time. The desk was near the main station, making it accessible to some neighborhoods but difficult to reach from remote villages. People who had abandoned applications before attending were almost invisible in the original statistics. The county introduced telephone explanations and translated summaries of standard procedures while maintaining confidentiality. Staff also referred complex matters to qualified legal professionals rather than giving advice beyond their training.

Paragraph 3. A supervised trial tracked correctly completed forms, missed deadlines, referrals, and unresolved requests. A separate change to the county’s document requirements had also occurred during the study, making it hard to attribute every improvement in application completion to the new desk. Evaluators stressed that the number of successful administrative decisions could be influenced by the facts of each case, not merely by assistance with paperwork.

Paragraph 4. After six months, Fairbourne continued the service where it could provide accurate, timely explanations. It revised outreach to include residents facing transport or language barriers and clarified what staff were authorized to do. The review concluded that practical procedural access could be improved without promising a particular legal outcome. Success should be assessed through accurate information, completed applications, fair accessibility, and responsible referrals, rather than the total number of appointments.

Q33. Why did the evaluator reject the early claim?

A. Appointments did not demonstrate completed appeals or successful decisions. / B. The advice desk had never opened. / C. All cases were resolved before visits. / D. The county had no deadlines for applications.

Q34. What did the county do to improve accessibility?

A. Require all residents to visit the station. / B. Add telephone guidance and translated procedural summaries. / C. Eliminate confidentiality safeguards. / D. Replace qualified lawyers with volunteers.

Q35. Why was attributing every improvement to the desk difficult?

A. No one had completed any forms. / B. The desk provided legal representation in every case. / C. Document requirements changed at the same time. / D. All residents lived near the station.

全35問の解答と根拠・語義・段落別要点和訳

Q1〜Q22|全88択の意味と語彙解説

Q1:C. conflated — conflate A and B=本来別の概念・測定を混同する。

A. corroborated=裏づけた / B. delineated=明確に区分した / C. conflated=混同した / D. replicated=再現した

Q2:A. rectify — rectify mistakes=誤りを是正する。

A. rectify=是正する / B. perpetuate=存続させる / C. expedite=迅速化する / D. obscure=不明瞭にする

Q3:D. premature — premature=必要な検証が終わる前の時期尚早な判断。

A. inconsequential=取るに足らない / B. unanimous=全会一致の / C. impartial=公平な / D. premature=時期尚早の

Q4:B. ascertain — ascertain authenticity=真偽を確かめる。

A. reimburse=弁済する / B. ascertain=確かめる / C. evade=回避する / D. disperse=分散させる

Q5:D. entrench — entrench inequalities=格差を構造的に固定化する。

A. alleviate=緩和する / B. preclude=防ぐ / C. reconcile=調和させる / D. entrench=固定化する

Q6:B. eroded — erode an advantage=予測された利点を失わせる。

A. substantiated=裏づけた / B. eroded=徐々に損なった / C. conferred=授与した / D. expedited=早めた

Q7:A. retract — retract an assertion=不正確な主張を撤回する。

A. retract=撤回する / B. reiterate=繰り返す / C. vindicate=正当性を示す / D. disseminate=広める

Q8:C. disentangle — disentangle effects=複数の影響を切り分ける。

A. magnify=拡大する / B. perpetuate=持続させる / C. disentangle=複雑に絡むものを分ける / D. condone=容認する

Q9:C. incomplete — incomplete evidence=重要な対象が欠けた証拠。

A. unequivocal=曖昧さのない / B. exhaustive=網羅的な / C. incomplete=不完全な / D. definitive=最終的な

Q10:A. liable — liable for damage=損害について法的責任を負う。

A. liable=法的責任がある / B. exempt=免責された / C. eligible=資格のある / D. contingent=条件付きの

Q11:D. misconstrue — misconstrue A as B=AをBと誤解する。

A. corroborate=立証する / B. ratify=批准する / C. relinquish=放棄する / D. misconstrue=誤って解釈する

Q12:B. transparent — transparent account=前提を確認できる説明。

A. arbitrary=恣意的な / B. transparent=透明な / C. perfunctory=おざなりの / D. obsolescent=廃れつつある

Q13:A. rule out — rule out a possibility=検査により可能性を排除する。

A. rule out=可能性を除外する / B. stem from=由来する / C. give rise to=引き起こす / D. fall through=頓挫する

Q14:C. contingent — be contingent on=〜が条件である。

A. immune=影響されない / B. indifferent=無関心な / C. contingent=条件付きの / D. hostile=敵対する

Q15:B. sweeping — sweeping conclusions=限られた証拠から過度に一般化した結論。

A. provisional=暫定的な / B. sweeping=広く断定した / C. qualified=条件付きの / D. modest=慎重で控えめな

Q16:D. sustain — sustain services=サービスを維持する。

A. revoke=取り消す / B. exacerbate=悪化させる / C. implicate=関与を示す / D. sustain=維持する

Q17:C. discrepancy — discrepancy between figures=数値の食い違い。

A. precedent=前例 / B. concession=譲歩 / C. discrepancy=食い違い / D. dividend=配当

Q18:A. disclose — disclose conflicts of interest=利益相反を開示する。

A. disclose=開示する / B. suppress=抑制する / C. reimburse=払い戻す / D. circumvent=回避する

Q19:B. account for — account for expenditure=費用を織り込む。

A. phase out=段階的に廃止する / B. account for=考慮に入れる / C. brush aside=軽視する / D. run into=直面する

Q20:D. unrepresentative — unrepresentative sample=母集団を代表していない標本。

A. impartial=公平な / B. comprehensive=包括的な / C. randomized=無作為化された / D. unrepresentative=代表性がない

Q21:A. defer — defer introduction=導入を延期する。

A. defer=延期する / B. facilitate=容易にする / C. mandate=義務づける / D. expedite=迅速化する

Q22:C. verifiable — verifiable measurements=第三者が検証可能な測定値。

A. ambiguous=曖昧な / B. anecdotal=逸話的な / C. verifiable=検証可能な / D. proprietary=独占的な

Q23〜Q28|長文空所の正答と段落別要点和訳

古い手稿の電子公開と解釈上の注意

第1段落:架空のポートモア資料館は19世紀の商人の手紙をデジタル化した。閲覧数は増えたが、読者が解釈を理解したか、年代や訳語の不確実性に気づいたかは不明だった。

第2段落:異なる記録を比較すると過去の目録で人名の転記に差があり、現存する家族に関係する記述も見つかった。解釈に留保を付け、追加許可が必要な情報は無制限公開を控えることにした。

第3段落:学校では史料比較演習と印刷版を導入した。関心や閲覧数だけで学習成果を示せないため、正確性・アクセシビリティ・許可の適切さも評価指標へ加えた。

第4段落:原本を保存し、検証済み資料から公開した。不確かな文字起こしを確定情報として扱わないことが教育価値の条件となる。

Q23:C. context and publication rights needed further review — 複数解釈と家族情報があり、文脈と権利を確認する。

Q24:A. Consequently — 評価上の問題が判明した結果、目標を改める因果関係。

Q25:B. as long as reliable interpretations and legitimate rights were respected — 正確性と適切な権利の尊重が条件。

小規模都市の気温観測所と設置場所の偏り

第1段落:架空のノースウェル町は夏の暑さを調べる安価な気温センサーを取り付けた。新しいセンサーの平均値は高かったが、旧観測所との設置環境が異なり地域全体の気温上昇とは直ちに言えない。

第2段落:新センサーは道路沿いの壁、旧観測所は芝地にあり、直射日光も測定値へ影響した。校正と同条件の比較を行ってから原因を判断する必要があった。

第3段落:公聴会に来られる人の意見は、長時間勤務者や移動が難しい住民の代表とは限らず、電話調査やアクセスが悪い場所の観察を追加した。温度だけでなく日陰の待ち場所へ安全に行けるかも調べた。

第4段落:必要性が確認できる場所に仮設日陰を設け、全地点の同一導入を避けた。測定の妥当性と住民が実際に利用できるかを評価した。

Q26:D. sensor placement could explain part of the difference — 設置場所が測定の相違を説明する可能性。

Q27:C. Therefore — 会議参加者の偏りを踏まえ調査方法を拡大した。

Q28:A. if methods, locations, and residents’ practical access were checked — 測定方法・場所・利用可能性の確認が条件。

Q29〜Q35|内容一致の正答と段落別要点和訳

古代の木材を年代測定する研究と解釈の限界

第1段落:架空のウェストミア大学は河畔の集落で発掘した木材の年代を調べた。1つの木材に予想より古い年代が示され注目されたが、それだけで地域全体の建築史を書き換えられない。

第2段落:木材は後に再利用された可能性があり、長期間の水への曝露で元の位置も不確かだった。近くの資料や文献と比較し、別の研究機関でも追加測定を行った。

第3段落:測定結果は完全には一致しなかったが、試料の履歴を踏まえれば両立する幅に収まった。不確実性は研究失敗と同義ではなく、言えることの範囲を示す。注目が高いと査読前の過剰な断定を誘発し得る。

第4段落:一部の解釈だけを修正し、複数資料が支える結論と仮説を分けて展示した。劇的な数字1つより、独立した証拠を組み合わせた説明の改善が重要。

Q29:C. A date from one object could not establish the age of every building. — one object cannot date every building。

Q30:A. The wood might have been reused and displaced from its original context. — reuse and site history。

Q31:B. It helps indicate the limits of what evidence supports. — uncertainty sets justified range。

Q32:D. Combine independent evidence and distinguish findings from hypotheses. — independent triangulation and qualified claims。

地域の法的支援案内と申請完了率

第1段落:架空のフェアボーン郡は行政への不服申し立ての手続を説明する無料窓口を設けた。予約は多かったが、実際に申請が完成したか、判断が有利だったかは別で、窓口は代理人や審査機関ではない。

第2段落:駅近くの窓口へ来られない遠隔の住民や途中で諦めた人のデータが不足し、電話説明と翻訳された案内を追加した。複雑な事件は適切な法律専門家を紹介した。

第3段落:正しく完成した書類、期限切れ、紹介と未解決を追跡した。同時期に必要書類の規則も変わっており、完了率の変化を窓口だけの成果と断定できない。申請の結果は事件の事実関係にもよる。

第4段落:正確かつ期限内に説明できる窓口を残し、交通・言語の障壁を減らした。特定の法的結果は保証せず、正確な手続案内・完了・公平性・適切な紹介で評価。

Q33:A. Appointments did not demonstrate completed appeals or successful decisions. — appointment ≠ completed forms or result。

Q34:B. Add telephone guidance and translated procedural summaries. — phone and translations。

Q35:C. Document requirements changed at the same time. — simultaneous procedural change。

7日間で失点を修正する復習

  • 初日:解答を隠して35問を解き、語彙・空所・内容一致別の正答率を確認。
  • 2日目:語彙の88択の意味と文脈の相性を復習。
  • 3日目:手稿の読解で保存許可・公開許可・学習効果を区別。
  • 4日目:温度センサーの読解で設置場所と環境要因の交絡を特定。
  • 5日目:木材の年代測定の文章で不確実性と捏造の違いを説明。
  • 6日目:行政窓口の文章で予約数と申請完了・結果を区別。
  • 7日目:35問を再解答し、正解の根拠を英文で短く説明する。

FAQ

英検1級Readingは35問ですか?

はい。現行形式は短文語句補充22問、長文空所補充6問、長文内容一致7問で合計35問です。

本文に出典がない数字や人物が登場しますが?

本教材の地名・人物・事例と英文は慶英会が独自に設定した架空の練習素材です。実在する研究や事件の証拠として扱わないでください。

関連する英検1級無料教材

慶英会では英検1級の長文・語彙・要約を個別に確認します。最大1か月無料体験・学習相談はこちら。

公式の出題形式:日本英語検定協会「1級の試験内容」。英文・問題・選択肢・要点訳と解説は慶英会独自作成です。

慶英会塾長のプロフィール写真

最大1か月完全無料体験・学習相談受付中

最大1か月の完全無料体験をご案内
学校教材・学力・目標に合わせた個別指導

入塾前に授業の進め方や講師との相性をお確かめください。

学校英語・定期テスト・英検の学習相談にも対応します。
保護者様の教育相談も無料で承ります。

1.学年 2. 学習目標 3.体験ご希望をお送りください。

体験の期間・回数・担当講師・日程は、ご希望と受付状況を確認してご案内します。

公式LINEで無料体験・学習相談Webフォームで無料体験・学習相談料金・無料体験の条件を確認する

慶英会 塾長|慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級。中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門としています。塾長の経歴・指導方針を確認する