慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門とするオンライン個別指導塾です。塾長紹介
英検1級Reading第19セット・独自無料演習です。語彙22問、長文空所補充6問、内容一致7問の合計35問・全140択を掲載。慶英会オリジナルの英文、選択肢の語義、詳しい解説、段落ごとの要点和訳で復習まで完結できます。英検協会の公式過去問ではありません。
結論：1級読解では難語の意味だけでなく、予測と観測の区別、対象者の偏り、条件付きの因果関係を丁寧に読み取ることが重要です。英検協会の公式試験内容を参照し、語彙22・長文空所6・長文内容一致7問の独自セットを作成しました。ReadingとWritingは合わせて100分です。
全35問を使った学習手順
- 語彙22問：正答以外の3択も意味を確認する。
- 長文空所6問：論理関係、原因と結果、例外条件に注目する。
- 内容一致7問：本文にない強い断定が含まれていないか確かめる。
- 初見は解答・訳を隠して計時し、Writingの時間も含めて自己管理する。
第1部｜語彙22問・全88選択肢
Q1. The committee urged the mayor to ___ the proposal until independent engineers had reviewed the bridge.
A. defer ／ B. disburse ／ C. delineate ／ D. deride
Q2. The auditors identified an important ___ between the contractor’s invoices and the amount actually paid.
A. precedent ／ B. discrepancy ／ C. concession ／ D. compliance
Q3. A carefully designed trial could ___ whether the proposed method reduces equipment failures.
A. forestall ／ B. overrule ／ C. ascertain ／ D. disseminate
Q4. The committee decided to ___ any grant recipient that failed to disclose a conflict of interest.
A. accommodate ／ B. exonerate ／ C. subsidize ／ D. disqualify
Q5. The museum had to ___ permission before publishing images supplied by private photographers.
A. obtain ／ B. relinquish ／ C. revoke ／ D. evade
Q6. The new policy was intended to ___ the impact of sudden fuel-price increases on rural bus operators.
A. aggravate ／ B. mitigate ／ C. replicate ／ D. precipitate
Q7. Researchers remained ___ about claiming that the observed association proved a causal effect.
A. adamant ／ B. indifferent ／ C. cautious ／ D. complacent
Q8. The council refused to ___ the safety inspection merely to meet an ambitious opening date.
A. facilitate ／ B. strengthen ／ C. reimburse ／ D. circumvent
Q9. The nonprofit agreed to ___ all expenses to an independent reviewer before requesting more funds.
A. disclose ／ B. conceal ／ C. forestall ／ D. prolong
Q10. The government promised to ___ groups that had been excluded from earlier public consultations.
A. alienate ／ B. include ／ C. marginalize ／ D. displace
Q11. The directors had to ___ competing demands for safety, cost, and accessibility.
A. reiterate ／ B. replenish ／ C. reconcile ／ D. revoke
Q12. The agency warned that an early estimate might ___ the benefits because maintenance costs were omitted.
A. understate ／ B. corroborate ／ C. forestall ／ D. overstate
Q13. A full evaluation must ___ the long-term costs of training and replacing specialist staff.
A. account for ／ B. dispose of ／ C. comply with ／ D. brush aside
Q14. The board asked an external panel to ___ the competing accounts before it published its conclusion.
A. condone ／ B. scrutinize ／ C. reimburse ／ D. endorse
Q15. The new agreement was ___ on suppliers meeting the updated safety standards.
A. immune ／ B. hostile ／ C. contingent ／ D. irrelevant
Q16. The research team was unable to ___ findings from two unusually wealthy districts to the whole region.
A. repudiate ／ B. remunerate ／ C. reiterate ／ D. generalize
Q17. The authority decided to ___ a misleading public statement after the original figures were corrected.
A. retract ／ B. reinforce ／ C. ratify ／ D. reproduce
Q18. The administrator sought to ___ the risks of data sharing by reducing unnecessary details.
A. exacerbate ／ B. minimize ／ C. delineate ／ D. magnify
Q19. The report treated a ___ increase in downloads as proof of better learning, which reviewers criticized.
A. negligible ／ B. tentative ／ C. substantial ／ D. obsolete
Q20. The legal adviser warned that the proposed publication could ___ the privacy of several individuals.
A. alleviate ／ B. reaffirm ／ C. expedite ／ D. compromise
Q21. The region pledged to ___ outdated equipment gradually rather than remove it overnight.
A. phase out ／ B. phase in ／ C. bear out ／ D. carry on
Q22. Experts cautioned that more pilot observations might ___ from longer monitoring rather than any genuine improvement.
A. deviate ／ B. stem ／ C. recede ／ D. elapse
第2部｜長文空所補充2篇・計6問
Passage 1｜使われなくなった公共施設と再利用
Paragraph 1. The fictional town of Ashcombe proposed converting an unused administrative building into a shared study center. Supporters expected the project to preserve a familiar landmark and avoid some costs associated with constructing a new facility. A preliminary assessment predicted substantial savings, but the building survey had examined only visible surfaces. Engineers noted that hidden wiring and foundations might require costly repairs before visitors could enter safely. The town council did not reject the conversion idea; it instead asked for a more complete technical evaluation.
Paragraph 2. The project team held a community survey, which attracted many responses from residents who already attended cultural events. Researchers warned that this sample could not represent everyone who might use the new facility. In particular, residents with limited mobility had not been adequately consulted. The council therefore expanded its consultations and promised that (23) ____. Architects also compared wheelchair access, fire exits, and the cost of maintaining the building during winter.
Paragraph 3. Following the review, officials agreed to renovate a limited part of the site for a supervised trial. They chose not to treat the number of visitors in the first week as evidence that the wider project would be economical. Early demand could reflect publicity rather than long-term use, and operating costs would depend on staffing and maintenance. (24) ____, the council established separate indicators for access, learning activities, energy use, and total expenditure.
Paragraph 4. The proposal remained under consideration after the initial trial. Officials emphasized that adaptive reuse could benefit the community, but it should (25) ____ rather than rely on an optimistic forecast or initial public enthusiasm.
Q23. How should (23) be completed?
A. accessibility needs would be considered before the design was finalized ／ B. only enthusiastic respondents would be permitted to use the building ／ C. technical inspections would no longer be necessary ／ D. visitors would be charged regardless of income
Q24. Which transition best fits (24)?
A. Nevertheless ／ B. Consequently ／ C. Likewise ／ D. For example
Q25. Which ending best fits (25)?
A. avoid all independent examination ／ B. assume that visitor numbers predict future operating costs ／ C. be evaluated through safety, access, and long-term costs ／ D. replace every other public learning service
Passage 2｜湿地保全と洪水対策の政策判断
Paragraph 1. The fictional county of Westford began restoring a tidal wetland near several residential neighborhoods. Supporters believed the vegetation and open ground could absorb some floodwater and provide habitat for birds. A computer model suggested that restoration might reduce flooding during certain storms. Some officials announced that this would eliminate the need for expensive drainage repairs. Scientists objected that the model had tested only limited conditions and that unusually intense rainfall could overwhelm the wetland.
Paragraph 2. The research team monitored water levels, vegetation growth, and maintenance expenses over several seasons. It also compared the restored wetland with nearby areas that had not undergone intervention. However, differences in the land’s elevation complicated comparisons. The researchers acknowledged that (26) ____. They also consulted residents living close to the site and asked whether restoration work affected paths used to reach schools and local services.
Paragraph 3. Initial evidence suggested that the restored wetland retained water during some moderate storms, but maintenance was more expensive than predicted. A prolonged dry period also affected vegetation growth. The project team recognized that these results were too limited to justify a universal claim. (27) ____, it extended monitoring and proposed additional assessments under different weather conditions.
Paragraph 4. At the end of the review, the county continued a smaller restoration program alongside repairs to existing drainage systems. Officials concluded that wetlands might contribute to flood protection and ecological value, (28) ____. They promised to publish both successful measurements and limitations rather than treat one encouraging trial as definitive evidence.
Q26. What fits (26)?
A. land elevation had no effect on the comparison ／ B. differences in local conditions limited simple conclusions about the restoration ／ C. all nearby districts had identical physical conditions ／ D. the team had already studied every possible storm
Q27. Which transition best fits (27)?
A. For instance ／ B. Similarly ／ C. Therefore ／ D. On the contrary
Q28. Which phrase best completes (28)?
A. because every possible storm was already understood ／ B. although future drainage maintenance could be abandoned ／ C. even if the wetland never retained any water ／ D. provided they were evaluated realistically and combined with other measures
慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
塾長の経歴・指導方針
中高一貫校の英語・定期テスト・英検の学習状況を整理し、必要な復習の優先順位を考えたい方は、無料体験・学習相談のご案内をご確認ください。最大1か月完全無料体験の対象・回数・担当講師は、お申し込み時にご案内します。
友だち追加後、学年・教材・困っていることと「学習相談希望（ブログ・記事中盤）」をお送りください。LINEを開くだけでは受付は完了しません。LINEを利用できない方はメールでの学習相談も可能です。料金・無料体験の期間と条件はコース・料金・無料体験のご案内でご確認ください。
第3部｜内容一致2長文・計7問
Passage 1｜地域技術の修理講座と実際の技能
Paragraph 1. The fictional region of Brookesfield developed a training scheme to help unemployed adults repair household appliances. Organizers believed that practical instruction could open opportunities for work while reducing the number of products discarded unnecessarily. Local colleges offered weekend workshops and video demonstrations. Enrollment increased rapidly, and the regional director pointed to this figure as evidence that the program had already improved employment prospects. An evaluation team noted, however, that registrations did not reveal whether students completed the course, demonstrated safe repair skills, or found work.
Paragraph 2. The evaluators observed that volunteers had enrolled in the pilot. Participants could be more motivated than other job seekers, making it risky to attribute any improvement to the program alone. Several workshops also depended on equipment donated by private firms, which might not be available in every district. To assess learning more reliably, the team introduced supervised practical tests and collected information about completed repairs, safety procedures, and subsequent work experiences. It also recorded people who dropped out rather than examining only successful trainees.
Paragraph 3. During the first year, participants at several colleges completed supervised repairs that would previously have required outside technicians. Yet some trainees had difficulty finding jobs because local employers lacked vacancies. Organizers therefore introduced short placements with participating businesses, while carefully distinguishing a placement from a permanent job. The evaluation team recommended reporting results separately for different regions and groups with unequal access to transport or equipment.
Paragraph 4. Brookesfield retained the initiative but declined to claim it had solved unemployment. Officials concluded that practical courses could support skills development, provided quality, fairness, and employment outcomes were independently examined. They also stressed that reducing appliance waste required separate evidence about product lifetimes, energy use, and the amount of material actually discarded. Repair counts alone did not prove either employment success or environmental savings.
Q29. Why did evaluators question the director’s early claim?
A. Enrollment could not demonstrate completed training or better employment. ／ B. The courses had already ended before anyone registered. ／ C. The region had no colleges. ／ D. All participants found work immediately.
Q30. What may have biased the pilot’s findings?
A. Every participant was randomly selected. ／ B. The same equipment existed in every district. ／ C. Participants volunteered and might have been unusually motivated. ／ D. The practical assessments were illegal.
Q31. What was the purpose of supervised practical tests?
A. To eliminate the need for any instructors. ／ B. To assess actual repair ability and safety. ／ C. To measure course advertising success. ／ D. To replace every employer interview.
Q32. What was the final distinction about environmental benefits?
A. Every repair automatically saved energy. ／ B. Repair courses were prohibited from discussing waste. ／ C. Waste data were unnecessary. ／ D. Repair totals alone did not demonstrate overall waste reduction.
Passage 2｜古い灌漑用水路のデジタル地図と地域社会
Paragraph 1. The fictional town of Alderford decided to digitize maps and maintenance records for canals that had supplied farms for generations. Engineers welcomed the project because many paper plans were deteriorating, making it difficult to identify underground connections when repairs were needed. The local council hoped that an online archive would accelerate decisions about blocked channels and damaged gates. Early uploads attracted significant attention from residents, but the archivists warned that a growing number of available documents did not necessarily mean the information was accurate or complete.
Paragraph 2. Some maps had been drawn before later modifications to the canals, while others used outdated land boundaries. Surveyors therefore compared the drawings with current field observations. The project also raised questions about the rights of landowners and farmers whose properties were depicted. Although information about publicly maintained infrastructure served a legitimate purpose, publishing precise details of private access routes could create unnecessary problems. The archive team consulted affected communities and sometimes displayed general information while restricting sensitive records.
Paragraph 3. During the pilot, technicians successfully located several repair sites more quickly by using verified digital maps. However, the improvement depended on having reliable devices and trained staff. In remote areas with limited connections, workers still needed printed copies. The city maintained both formats and established a process through which residents could report errors in the digital archive. The archivists emphasized that recording an old plan did not prove the physical canal remained in the same condition.
Paragraph 4. The town eventually extended the project, but it evaluated success through repair accuracy, response times, and the protection of legitimate interests rather than web traffic alone. Officials concluded that digital records were valuable when they were checked against reality and kept up to date. They also committed to preserving original documents so that changes and uncertain interpretations could be investigated later.
Q33. Why were the old maps not always dependable?
A. They had all been created in foreign languages. ／ B. Some no longer reflected modifications and current boundaries. ／ C. The town had no record of any canals. ／ D. Engineers refused to consult the maps.
Q34. Why was some information restricted?
A. No information about canals was useful. ／ B. The council intended to end public repairs. ／ C. Detailed private access information could affect legitimate rights and interests. ／ D. All maps were required to be secret.
Q35. What conclusion did the town draw from the pilot?
A. Updated, verified maps were useful, while accuracy and access needed continuing review. ／ B. Online visitor numbers were sufficient evidence of success. ／ C. Every canal could be inspected without trained workers. ／ D. Original paper documents should be destroyed.
全35問の正解と根拠・段落別要点訳
Q1〜Q22｜語彙の全解答・全88択の日本語訳
Q1：A. defer — defer a proposal＝検証が済むまで決定を延期する。
A. defer＝延期する ／ B. disburse＝支払う ／ C. delineate＝明確に示す ／ D. deride＝嘲笑する
Q2：B. discrepancy — discrepancy between A and B＝二つの記録の食い違い。
A. precedent＝先例 ／ B. discrepancy＝不一致 ／ C. concession＝譲歩 ／ D. compliance＝遵守
Q3：C. ascertain — ascertain whether＝〜かどうかを確かめる。
A. forestall＝未然に防ぐ ／ B. overrule＝覆す ／ C. ascertain＝確かめる ／ D. disseminate＝広める
Q4：D. disqualify — disqualify a recipient＝受給者を不適格にする。
A. accommodate＝便宜を図る ／ B. exonerate＝容疑を晴らす ／ C. subsidize＝補助する ／ D. disqualify＝資格を失わせる
Q5：A. obtain — obtain permission＝許可を得る。ownershipとpublication rightsは別。
A. obtain＝取得する ／ B. relinquish＝放棄する ／ C. revoke＝取り消す ／ D. evade＝回避する
Q6：B. mitigate — mitigate the impact＝悪影響を和らげる。
A. aggravate＝悪化させる ／ B. mitigate＝軽減する ／ C. replicate＝再現する ／ D. precipitate＝引き起こす
Q7：C. cautious — be cautious about claiming＝因果関係を断定しない。
A. adamant＝譲らない ／ B. indifferent＝無関心な ／ C. cautious＝慎重な ／ D. complacent＝自己満足の
Q8：D. circumvent — circumvent inspection＝検査を不当に回避する。
A. facilitate＝容易にする ／ B. strengthen＝強化する ／ C. reimburse＝払い戻す ／ D. circumvent＝回避する
Q9：A. disclose — disclose expenses＝支出を公開する。
A. disclose＝開示する ／ B. conceal＝隠す ／ C. forestall＝未然に防ぐ ／ D. prolong＝長引かせる
Q10：B. include — include excluded groups＝取り残された住民も参加させる。
A. alienate＝疎外する ／ B. include＝含める ／ C. marginalize＝周縁化する ／ D. displace＝移動させる
Q11：C. reconcile — reconcile competing demands＝相反する要求を調整する。
A. reiterate＝繰り返す ／ B. replenish＝補充する ／ C. reconcile＝調整して両立させる ／ D. revoke＝取り消す
Q12：D. overstate — overstate benefits＝便益を過大評価する。
A. understate＝過少に示す ／ B. corroborate＝裏付ける ／ C. forestall＝防ぐ ／ D. overstate＝誇張する
Q13：A. account for — account for costs＝費用を考慮に入れる。
A. account for＝考慮する ／ B. dispose of＝処分する ／ C. comply with＝従う ／ D. brush aside＝軽視する
Q14：B. scrutinize — scrutinize accounts＝説明・記録を詳しく検証する。
A. condone＝黙認する ／ B. scrutinize＝精査する ／ C. reimburse＝払い戻す ／ D. endorse＝支持する
Q15：C. contingent — be contingent on＝〜が成立条件である。
A. immune＝影響を受けない ／ B. hostile＝敵対する ／ C. contingent＝条件付きの ／ D. irrelevant＝無関係な
Q16：D. generalize — generalize from A to B＝限定的な標本から全体を推論する。
A. repudiate＝否認する ／ B. remunerate＝報酬を支払う ／ C. reiterate＝再度述べる ／ D. generalize＝一般化する
Q17：A. retract — retract a statement＝発言・記述を撤回する。
A. retract＝撤回する ／ B. reinforce＝強化する ／ C. ratify＝批准する ／ D. reproduce＝再現する
Q18：B. minimize — minimize risks＝リスクを減らす。
A. exacerbate＝悪化させる ／ B. minimize＝最小化する ／ C. delineate＝描写する ／ D. magnify＝増大させる
Q19：C. substantial — substantial increase＝大幅な増加。ただしダウンロード数と学習成果は別。
A. negligible＝ごく小さい ／ B. tentative＝暫定的な ／ C. substantial＝大幅な ／ D. obsolete＝時代遅れの
Q20：D. compromise — compromise privacy＝プライバシーを損なう。
A. alleviate＝緩和する ／ B. reaffirm＝再確認する ／ C. expedite＝迅速化する ／ D. compromise＝危険にさらす
Q21：A. phase out — phase out old equipment＝旧設備を段階的に廃止。
A. phase out＝段階的に廃止する ／ B. phase in＝段階的に導入する ／ C. bear out＝裏付ける ／ D. carry on＝続ける
Q22：B. stem — stem from＝〜に由来する。観測回数増は時間延長による可能性。
A. deviate＝逸脱する ／ B. stem＝由来する ／ C. recede＝後退する ／ D. elapse＝経過する
Q23〜Q28｜長文空所の根拠・段落別要点訳
使われなくなった公共施設と再利用
第1段落の要点訳：架空のアシュコム町は、使われていない役所建物を学習センターへ転用することを提案した。新築費の一部削減を期待したが、予備的な建物調査は表面だけで、配線や基礎の隠れた修理費が残る可能性があったため、より詳しい技術審査を求めた。
第2段落の要点訳：住民アンケートは文化行事に参加する人へ偏っていたため全利用者の代表ではない。移動に制約のある人の意見も不足しており、当事者の声を聞いて使いやすさを設計に反映する方針になった。車椅子利用、非常口、冬季の維持費も検討した。
第3段落の要点訳：一部だけ改修して試行した。初週の来場者数は宣伝効果の影響を受け、長期需要や経済性を証明しない。そこでアクセス、学習活動、電力、総費用を別々に測ることにした。
第4段落の要点訳：転用は地域に価値をもたらす可能性があるが、良好な予測や人気だけでなく安全性・利用可能性・維持費の検証に基づいて判断すべきとした。
Q23：A. accessibility needs would be considered before the design was finalized — 意見不足への対応として利用しやすさを設計前に検討する。
Q24：B. Consequently — 訪問人数を成果の証明に使えないため、複数の指標を設定する。因果関係のConsequently。
Q25：C. be evaluated through safety, access, and long-term costs — 安全、アクセスと長期費用を評価することが最も適切。
湿地保全と洪水対策の政策判断
第1段落の要点訳：架空のウェストフォード郡は住宅地近くの干潟・湿地を回復させ、雨水吸収と鳥の生息地保全を目指した。ある条件下の洪水緩和を示すモデルがあったが、強い豪雨では湿地の能力が不足する可能性があり、既存の排水路修理を不要と断定できない。
第2段落の要点訳：水位、植生、維持費を季節ごとに観測し、改修していない近隣地区とも比較した。ただし土地の標高が違い、厳密な因果推定には限界があると認めた。住民が学校や公共施設へ行く道への影響も調べた。
第3段落の要点訳：一部の中程度の嵐では水を保持できたが、維持費は予測より高く、乾燥時期が植生へ影響した。広い地域へ一般化するには材料が足りず、追加の監視と別の気象条件の評価を行うことにした。
第4段落の要点訳：郡は既存排水設備の修理と並行して限定的な湿地回復を続けた。湿地の効果は条件次第で、独立した測定と既存インフラの組合せが必要とし、良い結果と限界を公表する。
Q26：B. differences in local conditions limited simple conclusions about the restoration — 標高など立地条件が異なるので単純比較はできない。
Q27：C. Therefore — 普遍的な結論が出ないため監視を延長する。Therefore。
Q28：D. provided they were evaluated realistically and combined with other measures — 条件付きの効用を認め、他の対策と組み合わせる。
Q29〜Q35｜内容一致の根拠・段落別要点訳
地域技術の修理講座と実際の技能
第1段落の要点訳：架空のブルックスフィールド地域は失業中の成人に家電修理を教える講座を設けた。受講登録者数が増えたことを就職改善の証拠とする声があったが、登録は修了、安全な技能習得、就職を示すものではない。
第2段落の要点訳：参加者は自発的応募者で意欲が偏る可能性があり、講座には民間から寄贈された機器が使われていて全地域で同じ設備を準備できるとは限らない。監督付きの実技試験、修理の完了、安全手順、その後の就業、脱落者を記録することにした。
第3段落の要点訳：一部では以前は外注だった修理を実施できるようになったが、地域の求人不足により全員が就職できたわけではない。企業での短期研修を導入したが、研修参加と正規の職への就職は分けた。交通や設備の条件が異なる地域ごとに結果を評価する。
第4段落の要点訳：講座を継続したが失業問題を解決したとは主張しない。品質・公平性・就業成果を独立して調査する。家電廃棄の削減には寿命・消費電力・実際の廃棄量など別の証拠が必要であり、修理件数だけでは証明できない。
Q29：A. Enrollment could not demonstrate completed training or better employment. — registration alone does not show completion or jobs。
Q30：C. Participants volunteered and might have been unusually motivated. — volunteer self-selection bias。
Q31：B. To assess actual repair ability and safety. — measured skills rather than only enrollment。
Q32：D. Repair totals alone did not demonstrate overall waste reduction. — counts do not prove lifetime or environmental effects。
古い灌漑用水路のデジタル地図と地域社会
第1段落の要点訳：架空のアルダーフォード町は古くなる農業用水路の紙の図面と保守記録を電子化した。破損箇所を探しやすくなると期待されたが、公開文書の件数が増えただけで正確で完全な地図になったとは限らない。
第2段落の要点訳：地図の中には水路改修以前に描かれたものや古い土地境界が含まれ、測量者は現地調査で照合した。所有者や農家の権利も考慮し、公的施設の情報は公開するが私有地への進入路などの詳しい記録は制限する場合があった。
第3段落の要点訳：確認済みの地図で修理地点を早く見つけられたが、端末や職員の技能が必要だった。通信の弱い地区では紙図面も必要で、両形式を維持し、住民が誤記を報告できる仕組みを作った。過去の設計図は現在の水路の状態を保証しない。
第4段落の要点訳：町は電子化を拡大したが、成功は閲覧者数ではなく修理の正確さ・対応時間・権利保護で判断した。現場との照合と更新が重要であり、記録の変遷を確かめるため元の文書も保存した。
Q33：B. Some no longer reflected modifications and current boundaries. — older maps may not match altered canals or land boundaries。
Q34：C. Detailed private access information could affect legitimate rights and interests. — public interest balanced with private access details。
Q35：A. Updated, verified maps were useful, while accuracy and access needed continuing review. — map accuracy and practicality over downloads。
誤答を分類して7日間で定着させる
- 1日目：Q1〜Q35を初見で実施し、語彙・空所・内容一致の正答率を別に確認する。
- 2日目：正答しなかった語彙について4択全部の意味・目的語を確認する。
- 3日目：公共施設の再利用を扱う長文で『初期の期待と継続費用』を区別する。
- 4日目：湿地の長文で『条件付きの効果と既存排水路の補完』を整理する。
- 5日目：修理講座の長文で『登録数と技能・就職成果』を区別する。
- 6日目：デジタル地図の長文で『過去の記録と現在の実物』を比較する。
- 7日目：誤答した問題を英文だけで再解答し、理由も口頭で説明する。
FAQ｜英検1級Reading
内容一致問題では全文を一語一句和訳する必要がありますか？
全文の正確な理解が理想ですが、試験時には質問の対象・本文の根拠・因果・留保に重点を置きます。この教材では復習のための段落別要点訳を付けています。
この35問は英検の公式問題ですか？
いいえ。公式の問題構成を参考に慶英会が独自制作した非公式演習です。人物、都市、研究や制度の内容は架空の設定です。
さらに解く英検1級の無料教材
次の初見・無料教材：Reading第20セット（独自35問・全140択と要点和訳）。前回の誤答と根拠を見直してから、新作の問題へ進みましょう。慶英会が制作した独自の非公式問題です。
慶英会では語彙・長文・英文要約の苦手に合わせた個別指導を行います。最大1か月無料体験・学習相談はこちら。
出題形式参考：日本英語検定協会・1級試験内容。本文・選択肢・要点訳・解説は慶英会の独自制作です。
最大1か月完全無料体験・学習相談受付中
最大1か月の完全無料体験をご案内
学校教材・学力・目標に合わせた個別指導
入塾前に授業の進め方や講師との相性をお確かめください。
学校英語・定期テスト・英検の学習相談にも対応します。
保護者様の教育相談も無料で承ります。
1.学年 2. 学習目標 3.体験ご希望をお送りください。
体験の期間・回数・担当講師・日程は、ご希望と受付状況を確認してご案内します。
慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級。中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門としています。塾長の経歴・指導方針を確認する