NEW TREASURE Stage3 Readのセミコロン・コロン・ダッシュ・括弧40問｜英文の切れ目と論理【全解答】

Q1. The library was closed; students used the online catalog.

二つの独立した文を取り出す。

Q2. The first test looked promising; however, the sample was small.

howeverは何を示すか。

Q3. The club recorded twelve visits; it did not record twelve unique visitors.

12件の来訪と12人の来訪者は同じか。

Q4. The draft contained errors; the final version did not.

did notの後ろに省略された内容は。

Q5. The team met in Kyoto, Japan; Seoul, South Korea; and Hanoi, Vietnam.

一覧にセミコロンを使った理由は。

Q6. The room opens at nine; registration closes at eight thirty.

受付と開室はどちらが先か。

Q7. We checked the source; therefore, we corrected the caption.

thereforeの意味は。

Q8. Our plan was clear; the weather changed suddenly.

天気の変化が計画失敗の唯一の原因と断定できるか。

Q9. The checklist has three parts: author, date, and source.

コロン後に列挙された三つは。

Q10. The group reached one conclusion: the evidence was incomplete.

コロンの後半はどんな役割か。

Q11. Bring these items: a notebook, a pencil, and your school card.

持参物は何か。

Q12. The survey had one limitation: only twelve people responded.

記載されている制約は。

Q13. The notice gave one deadline: Friday at 4 p.m.

締切時刻は。

Q14. There were two options: accept the change or request another date.

二つの選択肢は。

Q15. The report made a warning clear: a popular claim is not automatically true.

警告の内容は。

Q16. Our goal was simple: to make the guide usable without extra help.

to makeの役割は。

Q17. The event starts at five (doors open at four thirty).

イベント開始と開場の時刻は。

Q18. The report (updated on Monday) shows the final schedule.

updated on Mondayが修飾する名詞は。

Q19. The club received twenty responses (not twenty different visitors).

括弧内の警告は。

Q20. The map includes two routes (A and B).

A and Bが示すものは。

Q21. The class tested a guide (without recording names).

括弧内から分かることは。

Q22. A pilot (six participants) cannot prove the plan will work for everyone.

参加者数と一般化の限界は。

Q23. The result was encouraging (although some data were missing).

括弧内の情報は主張を強めるか制限するか。

Q24. The task was simple (at least on paper): ask, test, and revise.

at least on paperの意味は。

Q25. The team discovered one problem—the map was outdated.

ダッシュ後は何の説明か。

Q26. The guide needed one thing—clarity.

強調されている名詞は。

Q27. A small change—the new entrance label—made the route clearer.

二つのダッシュの内側は何か。

Q28. We revised the heading—it had confused four visitors.

had confusedが指す時間は。

Q29. I expected an easy task—instead, I found three errors.

insteadの働きは。

Q30. The results were mixed—five preferred A, four preferred B.

明らかな人数は何か。

Q31. The work was easy—or so we thought.

or so we thoughtの意味は。

Q32. Two questions remained—who would check the figures, and when?

残った二つの質問は。

Q33. The meeting had two outcomes: the design was approved; the budget was not.

承認されたもの・されなかったものは。

Q34. The deadline was Friday (not Thursday); however, the time remained the same.

変更と不変の条件は。

Q35. The sign said, “The room may change.”

教室変更が確定したか。

Q36. The club offered three formats: printed notes, video captions, and live explanations.

提案された三形式は。

Q37. The new policy worked—at least for the six volunteers who tested it.

成果が確認された範囲は。

Q38. Our first report was clear; our revised report (published later) was more accurate.

どちらの報告が後から公開されたか。

Q39. The new policy addressed one issue: access; it did not prove improved learning.

証明されていない効果は。

Q40. The sign read, “Staff Only”; therefore, we used another entrance.

掲示内容と行動を答える。