慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門とするオンライン個別指導塾です。塾長紹介
英検1級語彙第20セット・無料42問です。句動詞・熟語を中心に独自4択22問（全88選択肢）、英語言い換え12問、独自長文2篇・内容一致8問を用意しました。すべての選択肢の意味、全42問の解答、長文の段落別要点訳と復習方法を掲載します。慶英会制作の非公式教材です。
英検1級Readingの語句空所補充は4択22問です。英検協会公式を参考に、hinge on、iron out、rule out、brush asideなどを英単語一語に近い意味の単位として練習します。
句動詞の4択に強くなる手順
- 空欄の前後を確認し、句動詞が取る目的語と前置詞を調べる。
- よく似た語の選択肢は、目的語との相性や否定の有無から区別する。
- 言い換え12問では書き換えた後の文法と意味が原文に一致しているか確かめる。
- 長文2篇では数字と実際の成果、支持と因果関係を混同しない。
第1部｜句動詞・熟語22問（Q1〜Q22）
Q1. The independent review helped ___ several weaknesses in the proposed public transport contract.
A. bring to light ／ B. put to rest ／ C. take after ／ D. fall back on
Q2. The grant will ___ whether the university can demonstrate measurable benefits to local residents.
A. stand for ／ B. hinge on ／ C. come across ／ D. pass over
Q3. The planners promised to ___ the safety concerns raised by residents rather than dismiss them.
A. make up for ／ B. set off ／ C. look into ／ D. break away from
Q4. Negotiators managed to ___ the remaining differences over how maintenance costs would be shared.
A. pass on ／ B. carry out ／ C. rule out ／ D. iron out
Q5. A new financial buffer may help ___ the service when government funding is reduced temporarily.
A. shore up ／ B. wind down ／ C. brush aside ／ D. draw up
Q6. The council agreed to ___ expansion until the pilot’s long-term costs had been independently assessed.
A. hold up ／ B. put off ／ C. take over ／ D. build on
Q7. The researchers could not ___ the possibility that the apparent improvement resulted from unusual weather.
A. run into ／ B. draw on ／ C. rule out ／ D. give way to
Q8. Officials were urged to ___ a detailed plan before applying for the additional grant.
A. rely on ／ B. break into ／ C. take after ／ D. draw up
Q9. The committee planned to ___ several alternative explanations before declaring a causal effect.
A. weigh up ／ B. break down ／ C. put aside ／ D. let off
Q10. The proposal may ___ if the participating organizations cannot agree on data-sharing rules.
A. take off ／ B. fall through ／ C. bring about ／ D. stand out
Q11. The administration decided to ___ extra support for residents who found digital applications difficult.
A. play down ／ B. rule out ／ C. step up ／ D. hold back
Q12. The city wanted to ___ outdated heating equipment gradually rather than remove everything overnight.
A. bring forward ／ B. carry over ／ C. follow up on ／ D. phase out
Q13. The technical review helped ___ the list of candidate sites from twelve to four.
A. narrow down ／ B. bring up ／ C. make do with ／ D. come under
Q14. The new standards will ___ a more consistent process for checking laboratory measurements.
A. fall through ／ B. bring about ／ C. give in ／ D. turn down
Q15. The regulator promised to ___ each reported incident rather than automatically treating all alerts as failures.
A. pass over ／ B. hold up ／ C. follow up on ／ D. run out of
Q16. Officials refused to ___ the concerns of households without internet access.
A. take after ／ B. set up ／ C. bring forward ／ D. brush aside
Q17. The agency had to ___ its budget assumptions when energy prices rose unexpectedly.
A. rethink ／ B. replicate ／ C. reinstate ／ D. reimburse
Q18. The university will ___ a supervised demonstration to verify whether students can use the equipment safely.
A. pass over ／ B. carry out ／ C. cut back on ／ D. look down on
Q19. Public enthusiasm cannot ___ a lack of reliable evidence when officials assess safety.
A. run into ／ B. stand by ／ C. make up for ／ D. get by
Q20. The funding arrangement may ___ a sudden shortage if several donors withdraw at the same time.
A. put together ／ B. bring out ／ C. count on ／ D. run into
Q21. The agency will ___ the pilot findings when designing the next phase.
A. build on ／ B. put down ／ C. get away with ／ D. fall back on
Q22. The plans for the community center might ___ next year if the construction budget is not approved.
A. set off ／ B. be put on hold ／ C. bear out ／ D. make up
第2部｜英語言い換え12問（Q23〜Q34）
Q23. The inquiry revealed problems that had previously been hidden.
Q24. Approval depends on a successful independent inspection.
Q25. Officials agreed to investigate the concerns.
Q26. The two groups resolved their remaining disagreements.
Q27. The agency postponed expansion until the audit ended.
Q28. The evidence could not eliminate an alternative explanation.
Q29. The council prepared a comprehensive plan.
Q30. The project was canceled because the partners disagreed.
Q31. The regulator increased monitoring after the incident.
Q32. The city gradually removed old equipment from service.
Q33. The agency reduced the list to three candidates.
Q34. Officials investigated every complaint after it was filed.
慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
塾長の経歴・指導方針
中高一貫校の英語・定期テスト・英検の学習状況を整理し、必要な復習の優先順位を考えたい方は、無料体験・学習相談のご案内をご確認ください。最大1か月完全無料体験の対象・回数・担当講師は、お申し込み時にご案内します。
友だち追加後、学年・教材・困っていることと「学習相談希望（ブログ・記事中盤）」をお送りください。LINEを開くだけでは受付は完了しません。LINEを利用できない方はメールでの学習相談も可能です。料金・無料体験の期間と条件はコース・料金・無料体験のご案内でご確認ください。
第3部｜独自長文2篇・8問（Q35〜Q42）
Passage 1｜安全な歩行者道路と地域の商業活動
Paragraph 1. The fictional town of Veldham planned to limit vehicle access to a narrow commercial street during certain afternoon hours. Shopkeepers hoped that a quieter area would attract pedestrians and make it easier for families to visit. A preliminary survey found strong support among customers who were already using the street, and some officials proposed expanding the restriction to the entire town. Transport researchers cautioned that the survey excluded many delivery drivers and residents who found the street difficult to reach.
Paragraph 2. The town tested a short closure on selected days while monitoring foot traffic, delivery reliability, business sales, and access for people with limited mobility. Pedestrian numbers increased during the trial, but a seasonal festival had been held nearby. The researchers could not rule out the festival’s influence. Some shops welcomed the change, while others experienced delays receiving goods. Officials therefore worked with delivery companies to draw up revised schedules rather than dismissing those concerns.
Paragraph 3. After several months, Veldham found that a limited closure could improve the street’s atmosphere without preventing essential access under certain conditions. It had not established that every commercial area would benefit or that higher foot traffic automatically led to increased profits. The council extended the trial only where practical arrangements and safety inspections were satisfactory. It concluded that the policy should be assessed through actual accessibility, local business needs, and repeated measurements, not public enthusiasm alone.
Q35. Why was the first survey limited?
A. It did not adequately include some drivers and people facing access difficulties. ／ B. Every town resident had been randomly selected. ／ C. The street was closed throughout the survey. ／ D. No customers expressed any opinion.
Q36. What complicated interpretation of increased pedestrian numbers?
A. Every shop had closed during the experiment. ／ B. A festival nearby could have influenced foot traffic. ／ C. No one recorded any traffic data. ／ D. Vehicles had never entered the street.
Q37. How did officials address delivery concerns?
A. They rejected every complaint. ／ B. They banned all future deliveries. ／ C. They worked on revised delivery schedules. ／ D. They required all drivers to use the same hour.
Q38. What does the final report emphasize?
A. Customer enthusiasm is proof of universal success. ／ B. More pedestrians guarantee more profit. ／ C. The restriction should be permanent everywhere. ／ D. Local access, business needs, and repeated evidence determine suitability.
Passage 2｜大学研究機器の修理協力と費用評価
Paragraph 1. The fictional University Alliance of Selmont established a program to share specialist technicians who could repair scientific equipment. Smaller universities frequently lacked staff trained to service expensive instruments, and a single breakdown sometimes interrupted research for weeks. The alliance hoped that a shared team would bring about shorter delays and avoid unnecessary replacement purchases. Early reports celebrated a rising number of repair requests and visits by technicians. An independent review warned that these figures were not equivalent to completed repairs or improved research outcomes.
Paragraph 2. During the pilot, the alliance tracked verified equipment failures, repair completion times, replacement parts, travel distances, and whether research projects resumed safely. Some facilities were located near the technicians and received prompt assistance; remote campuses faced longer journeys and higher transport costs. The review team therefore looked into whether the program benefited all participating institutions fairly. It also found that a repaired instrument could still require calibration before reliable data collection resumed.
Paragraph 3. The alliance agreed to step up support for remote campuses and narrow down the types of equipment for which shared maintenance was practical. It published clear eligibility rules and procedures for urgent cases. The final assessment showed promising outcomes for certain instruments but declined to claim that the approach saved money everywhere. Its long-term value would depend on reliable repairs, appropriate technical checks, and the cost of maintaining specialist expertise rather than the number of service tickets submitted.
Q39. What was misleading about early reports?
A. The alliance employed no technicians. ／ B. Every repair was canceled. ／ C. Repair request totals did not prove completed repairs or research benefits. ／ D. No university owned specialist equipment.
Q40. Why did remote campuses face different conditions?
A. All campuses had identical travel distances. ／ B. Distance increased delays and transport expenses. ／ C. Remote campuses had no research projects. ／ D. Technicians were never allowed to travel.
Q41. Why might a repaired instrument still be unusable?
A. Every component had to be replaced. ／ B. The university had banned calibration. ／ C. Repair itself guaranteed valid data. ／ D. It could require calibration before research resumed.
Q42. What guided the alliance’s final decisions?
A. Verified repair performance, technical needs, and total costs. ／ B. The highest possible number of service tickets. ／ C. Only the number of new staff hired. ／ D. Identical procedures for every type of equipment.
全42問の解答・全88選択肢の意味
Q1〜Q22｜句動詞22問の解答と全88択の語義
Q1：A. bring to light — bring weaknesses to light＝隠れていた問題を明らかにする。
A. bring to light＝明るみに出す ／ B. put to rest＝終結させる ／ C. take after＝似る ／ D. fall back on＝頼る
Q2：B. hinge on — hinge on＝成否がある条件にかかっている。
A. stand for＝象徴する ／ B. hinge on＝〜次第である ／ C. come across＝偶然見つける ／ D. pass over＝見送る
Q3：C. look into — look into concerns＝懸念の内容を調べる。
A. make up for＝埋め合わせる ／ B. set off＝引き起こす・出発する ／ C. look into＝調査する ／ D. break away from＝離れる
Q4：D. iron out — iron out differences＝細かい対立点を解消する。
A. pass on＝伝える ／ B. carry out＝実行する ／ C. rule out＝排除する ／ D. iron out＝解決する
Q5：A. shore up — shore up a service＝制度の安定を補強する。
A. shore up＝補強する ／ B. wind down＝段階的に縮小する ／ C. brush aside＝軽視する ／ D. draw up＝作成する
Q6：B. put off — put off expansion＝拡大を延期する。hold up も遅らせるがこの文では agree to put off が自然。
A. hold up＝遅延させる・持ちこたえる ／ B. put off＝延期する ／ C. take over＝引き継ぐ ／ D. build on＝発展させる
Q7：C. rule out — rule out a possibility＝可能性を否定できるだけの根拠が必要。
A. run into＝偶然遭遇する ／ B. draw on＝利用する ／ C. rule out＝可能性を排除する ／ D. give way to＝屈する
Q8：D. draw up — draw up a plan＝計画を作成する。
A. rely on＝頼る ／ B. break into＝進出する ／ C. take after＝似る ／ D. draw up＝策定する
Q9：A. weigh up — weigh up alternatives＝複数の説明を比較して判断する。
A. weigh up＝比較検討する ／ B. break down＝故障する ／ C. put aside＝脇へ置く ／ D. let off＝免除する
Q10：B. fall through — fall through＝交渉や計画が成立しない。
A. take off＝軌道に乗る ／ B. fall through＝頓挫する ／ C. bring about＝もたらす ／ D. stand out＝目立つ
Q11：C. step up — step up support＝支援を拡充する。
A. play down＝軽視する ／ B. rule out＝除外する ／ C. step up＝強化する ／ D. hold back＝抑える
Q12：D. phase out — phase out old equipment＝旧機器を段階的に廃止する。
A. bring forward＝前倒しする ／ B. carry over＝持ち越す ／ C. follow up on＝追跡する ／ D. phase out＝段階的に廃止する
Q13：A. narrow down — narrow down a list＝選択候補を限定する。
A. narrow down＝絞り込む ／ B. bring up＝話題にする ／ C. make do with＝間に合わせる ／ D. come under＝〜を受ける
Q14：B. bring about — bring about a process＝変化を引き起こす。
A. fall through＝頓挫する ／ B. bring about＝もたらす ／ C. give in＝屈服する ／ D. turn down＝拒否する
Q15：C. follow up on — follow up on a report＝報告の事実確認を続ける。
A. pass over＝無視する ／ B. hold up＝遅らせる ／ C. follow up on＝追跡調査する ／ D. run out of＝使い果たす
Q16：D. brush aside — brush aside concerns＝懸念を軽視して退ける。
A. take after＝似る ／ B. set up＝設立する ／ C. bring forward＝前倒しする ／ D. brush aside＝一蹴する
Q17：A. rethink — rethink assumptions＝前提を再考する。※通常の動詞だが句動詞の意味学習にも組み込む。
A. rethink＝再検討する ／ B. replicate＝再現する ／ C. reinstate＝復職させる ／ D. reimburse＝払い戻す
Q18：B. carry out — carry out a demonstration＝実証活動を行う。
A. pass over＝見送る ／ B. carry out＝実施する ／ C. cut back on＝削減する ／ D. look down on＝見下す
Q19：C. make up for — make up for a lack of evidence＝不足する証拠を埋め合わせる。世論の支持はその代わりにならない。
A. run into＝出くわす ／ B. stand by＝支持する ／ C. make up for＝埋め合わせる ／ D. get by＝どうにかやっていく
Q20：D. run into — run into a shortage＝不足に直面する。
A. put together＝まとめる ／ B. bring out＝引き出す ／ C. count on＝頼る ／ D. run into＝直面する
Q21：A. build on — build on findings＝調査結果を基にさらに発展させる。
A. build on＝土台として発展させる ／ B. put down＝けなす・書き留める ／ C. get away with＝処罰されずに済む ／ D. fall back on＝頼る
Q22：B. be put on hold — be put on hold＝計画が一時保留になる。
A. set off＝出発する・引き起こす ／ B. be put on hold＝保留される ／ C. bear out＝裏付ける ／ D. make up＝作り上げる
Q23〜Q34｜英語の言い換え模範回答
Q23：The inquiry brought previously hidden problems to light. — bring A to light。
Q24：Approval hinges on a successful independent inspection. — hinge on。
Q25：Officials agreed to look into the concerns. — look into。
Q26：The groups ironed out their remaining disagreements. — iron out differences。
Q27：The agency put off expansion until the audit ended. — put off。
Q28：The evidence could not rule out an alternative explanation. — rule out。
Q29：The council drew up a comprehensive plan. — draw up。
Q30：The project fell through because the partners disagreed. — fall through。
Q31：The regulator stepped up monitoring after the incident. — step up。
Q32：The city phased out old equipment. — phase out。
Q33：The agency narrowed down the list to three candidates. — narrow down。
Q34：Officials followed up on every complaint. — follow up on。
Q35〜Q42｜長文の要点訳と解答根拠
Passage 1の要点訳
段落1：架空のヴェルダム町は狭い商店街で午後の一部時間に車両を制限する案を試した。現利用客の賛成は多かったが、配達員や訪れにくい住民の意見が不足しており、全町への一律導入は適切ではなかった。
段落2：歩行者数・配達の確実性・売上・移動が難しい人のアクセスを測定した。歩行者は増えたが近くの季節行事の効果も考えられ、配達遅延が生じた店もあった。懸念を退けず配達会社と新たな時間設定を検討した。
段落3：条件を満たす場所で限定的な車両規制は有益だったが、すべての商店街で効果があるとも、歩行者増が利益増と同じともいえない。安全と実際の商業・生活への影響を評価する方針となった。
Q35：A. It did not adequately include some drivers and people facing access difficulties. — existing street users mainly surveyed。
Q36：B. A festival nearby could have influenced foot traffic. — festival as confounding factor。
Q37：C. They worked on revised delivery schedules. — draw up schedules together with delivery companies。
Q38：D. Local access, business needs, and repeated evidence determine suitability. — site-specific conditions over universal claim。
Passage 2の要点訳
段落1：架空のセルモント大学連合は高額な研究機器を修理できる専門技術者を共有した。小規模大学では故障が研究の長期中断を生み、修理の共同化で遅延と不要な買い替えを減らせると期待された。しかし修理依頼や技術者訪問の件数は修理完了や研究成果とは別だった。
段落2：実際の故障、修理完了、部品、移動距離、研究が安全に再開できたかを記録した。技術者に近いキャンパスは有利だが遠隔校は費用と待ち時間が増える。修理できても精度の校正が終わらなければ研究を再開できない。
段落3：遠隔校への支援を拡充し、共同保守が実用的な機器の種類を絞った。参加条件と緊急対応手順を明示。特定の装置で有望な結果は得たが、全ての大学で費用を削減するとは断言しなかった。
Q39：C. Repair request totals did not prove completed repairs or research benefits. — requests vs completed outcomes。
Q40：B. Distance increased delays and transport expenses. — travel distance and expense。
Q41：D. It could require calibration before research resumed. — calibration after repair。
Q42：A. Verified repair performance, technical needs, and total costs. — effective repairs and lifecycle cost。
7日間で定着させる復習法
- 1日目：4択22問の初見正答率を記録。
- 2日目：不正解3語を含めて88択の意味・連語を確認する。
- 3日目：12の言い換え文を見ずに作る。
- 4日目：歩行者道路の長文から来客増と売上を区別する。
- 5日目：研究機器の修理の長文から修理依頼・修理完了・安全な再開を区別する。
- 6日目：誤答句動詞を新しい主語・目的語で使う。
- 7日目：42問を解答なしで再試行する。
FAQ
句動詞は単独の訳で暗記すればよいですか？
訳だけでなく、hinge on a decision、iron out differences、rule out an explanationなど、続く語とセットで覚えることが重要です。
この42問は英検の公式過去問ですか？
いいえ。英検協会の問題構成を参考に慶英会が独自制作した問題です。公式過去問の転載は禁止転載はしていません。
次に学ぶ英検1級無料教材
新作・続編無料教材：語彙第21セット｜上級語句22問・言い換え12問・長文8問。前回の誤答を復習してから次の初見問題へ進み、根拠と解説を確認してください。すべて慶英会独自の非公式問題です。
慶英会では難語や句動詞の使い分け、初見長文、英作文の苦手を個別に確認します。最大1か月無料体験・学習相談をご利用ください。
試験形式出典：日本英語検定協会・英検1級の試験概要。英文、問題、和訳、解答は慶英会独自制作です。
最大1か月完全無料体験・学習相談受付中
最大1か月の完全無料体験をご案内
学校教材・学力・目標に合わせた個別指導
入塾前に授業の進め方や講師との相性をお確かめください。
学校英語・定期テスト・英検の学習相談にも対応します。
保護者様の教育相談も無料で承ります。
1.学年 2. 学習目標 3.体験ご希望をお送りください。
体験の期間・回数・担当講師・日程は、ご希望と受付状況を確認してご案内します。
慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級。中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門としています。塾長の経歴・指導方針を確認する