慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門とするオンライン個別指導塾です。塾長紹介
英検1級Reading・慶英会独自第35セット。英検協会の設問数に対応した語彙空所22問・長文空所6問・長文内容一致7問の合計35問・140択を無料公開します。全問の正答と根拠、語彙22問の全文和訳、長文4題の日本語全体解説、長文問題52択の誤答理由を掲載。重要なテーマは『推測と確証』『測定と因果』『公平な制度設計』です。
公式のReading問題数は短文の語句空所22問・長文語句空所6問・長文内容一致7問です（英検協会｜1級試験内容）。このページの英文・選択肢は慶英会が独自制作した練習であり、公式過去問ではありません。
次の無料演習：Reading第36セット｜語彙22・空所6・内容一致7の独自35問。初見で解いた後、解答根拠・誤答理由まで復習してください。
解く前に｜英検1級長文の重要な読み方
- 主張の出所を確認する。研究者・行政・企業・批判者がそれぞれ何を述べているか区別する。
- 報告された数値とそこから推測できることを分ける。increase in reportsは実態の増加と同義ではない。
- 可能性の強さを確認する。may、might、suggest、could、not necessarilyをwill、proveへ強めない。
- 模範解答を見る前に35問を通しで解き、根拠の英文を示してから答え合わせをする。
第1部｜語彙空所補充22問
Q1
Repeated exceptions to the reporting rule could _____ its original purpose.
- A. entrench
- B. undermine
- C. vindicate
- D. elucidate
Q2
The regulator ordered the laboratory to _____ the inaccurate safety notice immediately.
- A. rectify
- B. entrench
- C. disseminate
- D. invoke
Q3
Experts attempted to _____ the apparently conflicting results from the two surveys.
- A. preempt
- B. curtail
- C. deplete
- D. reconcile
Q4
The committee decided to _____ a portion of the budget for long-term maintenance.
- A. dispute
- B. delineate
- C. earmark
- D. forfeit
Q5
A sudden increase in demand threatened to _____ the region’s emergency stock of medical supplies.
- A. recoup
- B. deplete
- C. broker
- D. safeguard
Q6
The chair asked the speaker to _____ exactly which claims were supported by direct observation.
- A. delineate
- B. exacerbate
- C. invoke
- D. obviate
Q7
The company attempted to _____ the inspection process by classifying some components incorrectly.
- A. scrutinize
- B. bolster
- C. harmonize
- D. circumvent
Q8
The new findings may _____ the earlier assumption that the site was abandoned in winter.
- A. avert
- B. broker
- C. belie
- D. recoup
Q9
The manufacturer was required to _____ the instructions in several accessible formats.
- A. disseminate
- B. curtail
- C. retain
- D. forfeit
Q10
Officials hoped that early action would _____ a serious shortage of drinking water.
- A. invoke
- B. avert
- C. exacerbate
- D. consolidate
Q11
The review found that the policy might _____ inequalities between large and small suppliers.
- A. allay
- B. rectify
- C. entrench
- D. harmonize
Q12
The team decided to _____ its findings into an accessible guide for local schools.
- A. forfeit
- B. dispute
- C. invoke
- D. distill
Q13
The council commissioned experts to _____ the environmental impact of the proposed road.
- A. scrutinize
- B. obviate
- C. forfeit
- D. recoup
Q14
The new system is intended to _____ processing without weakening safeguards.
- A. deplete
- B. streamline
- C. dispute
- D. entrench
Q15
The damaged components had to be replaced before engineers could _____ operations.
- A. disaggregate
- B. curtail
- C. resume
- D. abrogate
Q16
The agreement would _____ older guidelines, which had become inconsistent with the new law.
- A. recoup
- B. bolster
- C. retain
- D. supersede
Q17
The program seeks to _____ support among organizations that have traditionally worked separately.
- A. broker
- B. withhold
- C. exacerbate
- D. dispute
Q18
An independent audit helped the university _____ confidence after the data error was discovered.
- A. preclude
- B. restore
- C. deplete
- D. disavow
Q19
The report _____ the difference between a statistical association and a proven cause.
- A. obviated
- B. ratified
- C. understated
- D. recouped
Q20
The authority decided to _____ grants until the recipients completed the required safety checks.
- A. disseminate
- B. bolster
- C. reconcile
- D. withhold
Q21
Officials planned to _____ the additional costs through gradual efficiency improvements.
- A. recoup
- B. forfeit
- C. invoke
- D. deplete
Q22
The committee asked for a revised forecast to _____ the effects of the two measures.
- A. scrutinize
- B. disaggregate
- C. consolidate
- D. supersede
第2部｜長文空所補充6問（独自英文2篇）
非常時の多言語案内と機械翻訳の限界
A fictional regional government developed a system for translating emergency notices into several languages. During a trial, the software produced messages within seconds, allowing officials to distribute warnings more quickly than before. Supporters argued that this speed could help residents who struggled to understand the majority language. Yet the trial also revealed a serious limitation. In one notice, an instruction to avoid a particular road until an inspection was completed appeared to tell readers that [23] _____. The grammatical structure sounded fluent, but the practical implication was dangerous.
The agency considered requiring a human translator to approve every message before publication. Although this would reduce some risks, a shortage of specialists could introduce delays during fast-moving emergencies. Another proposal involved preparing verified templates in advance for common situations, such as evacuation advice and temporary closures. These templates could be adapted under clear rules, while unusual messages would receive priority human review. The debate was therefore not simply about choosing humans over machines. It concerned [24] _____ when speed and accuracy were both essential.
Officials also recognized that access to a translated notice was only one part of effective communication. A person might understand the message but be unable to follow an evacuation route without accessible transport. The next pilot would therefore test comprehension, delivery times and the practical ability to act on the instructions. Rather than claiming that more translated words automatically meant better protection, the government planned to [25] _____.
Q23
- A. the road could be used before the safety inspection ended
- B. all roads were closed permanently
- C. the inspection had been canceled by residents
- D. the road had never been mentioned
Q24
- A. whether every emergency could be predicted accurately
- B. how to allocate review effort according to risk and urgency
- C. why machine translation should replace all safety planning
- D. whether official notices should be distributed only in one language
Q25
- A. avoid measuring whether residents understood the warnings
- B. treat output speed as the only meaningful outcome
- C. evaluate whether people could understand and act on the warnings
- D. remove all verified templates from the system
古い木材の年代推定と考古学の解釈
A fictional archaeology team discovered wooden beams beneath an abandoned warehouse. A preliminary report suggested that the building was older than local records indicated. Reporters quickly described the beams as proof that a large settlement had existed there centuries earlier. The team leader cautioned that [26] _____. Reused timber can be older than the structure in which it is found, and even an accurate date for a beam does not reveal the size or purpose of a settlement.
The researchers compared the wood with nearby artifacts, historical maps and layers of soil. Some evidence supported an early phase of activity, while other findings suggested that the warehouse had been rebuilt more recently. Instead of choosing the most dramatic story, the team proposed several possible sequences of construction. Their next step was to seek evidence that could distinguish between them. The researchers argued that scientific precision about a sample is not identical to [27] _____.
The project team planned an open exhibition of the findings, with diagrams showing which dates were measured and which historical explanations remained tentative. Local residents welcomed access to the research, but some feared that labels full of uncertainty would confuse visitors. The curators decided to use plain language without hiding the limits of the evidence. They hoped the exhibition would [28] _____ rather than present an attractive but unjustified account as settled history.
Q26
- A. every old beam conclusively dates the whole settlement
- B. historical maps should be ignored whenever wood is discovered
- C. the warehouse must have been built before any timber existed
- D. the age of a piece of wood does not by itself establish the history of the site
Q27
- A. certainty about the historical interpretation of the entire site
- B. the use of different measurement tools
- C. the date on a sample label
- D. a decision to publish the data
Q28
- A. remove all historical uncertainty from the evidence
- B. help visitors distinguish measured dates from tentative explanations
- C. declare that every newspaper report was correct
- D. limit access to the findings to specialists only
第3部｜長文内容一致7問（独自英文2篇）
長文内容一致A｜漁業の漁獲制限と小規模漁業者の生活
A fictional coastal government introduced annual limits on the catch of several commercially valuable fish species. Marine scientists supported the idea because catches had become less predictable, while some fishing crews reported spending longer at sea to obtain the same quantity of fish. The proposed limits were intended to prevent further pressure on breeding populations. Officials emphasized, however, that the policy would need to be revised as more reliable evidence became available.
Large fishing companies and small family-operated boats reacted differently. Larger firms had access to better monitoring equipment and could redistribute operations across several ports. Small operators often relied on one harbor and had little flexibility when particular fishing grounds were temporarily closed. A uniform reduction in permitted catch might therefore affect the livelihoods of different crews unevenly. Representatives of smaller boats called for practical transition support rather than an exemption from all conservation rules.
Another complication concerned how catches were counted. The available records focused on fish landed at official ports. They did not fully capture fish discarded at sea, and the reliability of records varied between vessels. If authorities evaluated success only by lower reported landings, they could overlook shifts in fishing behavior or improvements in recordkeeping. Scientists recommended combining catch information with independent surveys and detailed records of fishing effort.
One proposal would allocate a fixed share of the allowable catch to each registered operator. Supporters said it would provide predictability. Critics worried that historical allocations might reward those who had harvested the most in the past and make it difficult for newcomers to enter the industry. A second proposal would include limited opportunities for new entrants, while a third suggested periodic review of allocations based on updated ecological and social evidence.
The government has not chosen a permanent formula. It plans a staged trial that will measure species populations, fishing effort, household income and compliance costs. The case illustrates that conservation measures can protect long-term resources only when ecological monitoring is combined with fair implementation and credible evidence about who bears the costs.
Q29
What is the passage mainly concerned with?
- A. Why fishers should stop collecting scientific data.
- B. Why one permanent catch formula has already succeeded.
- C. How catch limits must balance ecological goals with fair implementation and measurement.
- D. Why large companies always oppose conservation.
Q30
Why might a uniform catch reduction affect small fishing crews more severely?
- A. They depend on fewer ports and have less operational flexibility.
- B. They are legally prohibited from fishing anywhere.
- C. They always catch more fish than major companies.
- D. They have already received unlimited compensation.
Q31
What weakness is identified in the existing catch records?
- A. They contain detailed information on every fish discarded at sea.
- B. They measure household incomes directly.
- C. They are unaffected by changes in recording practices.
- D. They focus on reported landings and may omit behavior at sea.
長文内容一致B｜医療機器の修理基準と長期供給体制
A fictional network of regional clinics has proposed common standards for repairing diagnostic equipment. Some clinics use devices from several manufacturers, each with different maintenance procedures and access requirements. Technicians argue that standardized documentation could help them identify faults faster and reduce the time patients must wait when equipment breaks down. Supporters also hope that sharing knowledge among clinics would make the network less dependent on a small number of external specialists.
Yet the proposal raises safety questions. A device that looks similar to another model may have different calibration requirements. An unapproved repair could alter measurements in ways that are difficult to detect immediately. Manufacturers warn that allowing unrestricted changes to software or components could undermine patient safety. Independent repair technicians respond that withholding every diagnostic manual can make clinics wait unnecessarily for routine maintenance. Both groups acknowledge that not every task carries the same risk.
The network therefore considered separating low-risk maintenance from more consequential interventions. Cleaning filters or replacing standard cables might be permitted after appropriate training, while altering measurement software or critical sensors would require specialized authorization and independent testing. A shared register could record who completed each repair, which parts were used and whether the device passed a subsequent performance check.
Financial arrangements also matter. Manufacturers sometimes offer long-term support contracts, but an initial discount may be followed by expensive proprietary parts. Conversely, using a lower-priced independent provider may reduce immediate spending yet increase administrative and liability costs if its work is poorly documented. Clinic managers concluded that the price of a repair should be assessed alongside reliability, legal responsibility and the availability of replacement parts.
Finally, the network planned to test its standards on a limited range of equipment before adopting them widely. Evaluators would measure repair times, repeat failures, training costs and whether patients could obtain essential tests when needed. The central objective was not to eliminate manufacturers or maximize the number of repairs performed locally. It was to create safe, accountable and sustainable maintenance arrangements that preserved access to care.
Q32
What is the main goal of the proposed repair standards?
- A. To improve safe, accountable maintenance and continuity of medical services.
- B. To abolish every manufacturer warranty immediately.
- C. To ensure all clinics use identical equipment.
- D. To reduce all repairs to one simple procedure.
Q33
Why do manufacturers express concern about unrestricted independent repairs?
- A. They believe that all cables are impossible to replace.
- B. They object to any written repair records.
- C. Changes to critical components could affect measurement accuracy and patient safety.
- D. They have confirmed that every repair is equally hazardous.
Q34
Which distinction is central to the network’s approach?
- A. Old equipment versus only newly purchased devices.
- B. Low-risk routine tasks versus high-risk changes requiring specialized review.
- C. Domestic versus foreign patients.
- D. Repairs done in the morning versus afternoon.
Q35
What does the passage suggest about choosing a repair provider?
- A. The lowest initial invoice always produces the safest result.
- B. Manufacturers should be excluded from every contract.
- C. Independent repair is necessarily more expensive.
- D. Initial price must be considered alongside reliability, responsibility and future support.
全35問の解答・日本語解説
語彙22問｜正答・全文和訳・誤答語の識別
Q1：B undermine。全文訳：例外の繰り返しで規則の本来の目的が損なわれる。根拠：undermine a purpose＝目的を損なう。誤答：entrench／vindicate／elucidate は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q2：A rectify。全文訳：当局は誤った安全通知を直ちに修正するよう求めた。根拠：rectify an error＝誤りを是正する。誤答：entrench／disseminate／invoke は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q3：D reconcile。全文訳：専門家は2つの調査の一見矛盾する結果を整合させようとした。根拠：reconcile conflicting results。誤答：preempt／curtail／deplete は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q4：C earmark。全文訳：委員会は予算の一部を長期維持管理のために確保すると決めた。根拠：earmark funds for＝特定目的に充当する。誤答：dispute／delineate／forfeit は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q5：B deplete。全文訳：需要の急増で医療用品の非常備蓄が枯渇する恐れがあった。根拠：deplete stock＝蓄えを減らし尽くす。誤答：recoup／broker／safeguard は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q6：A delineate。全文訳：議長は直接観測によって裏付けられた主張を明確に区分するよう求めた。根拠：delineate＝範囲・境界を明らかにする。誤答：exacerbate／invoke／obviate は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q7：D circumvent。全文訳：会社は一部部品を誤分類して点検手続きを回避しようとした。根拠：circumvent regulations＝抜け道を使って回避する。誤答：scrutinize／bolster／harmonize は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q8：C belie。全文訳：新発見は冬季に遺跡が使われなかったという従来の前提が誤りであることを示すかもしれない。根拠：belie an assumption＝想定と実態が違うことを示す。誤答：avert／broker／recoup は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q9：A disseminate。全文訳：製造者は説明書を複数の利用しやすい形式で周知する義務を負った。根拠：disseminate information＝情報を広く配布する。誤答：curtail／retain／forfeit は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q10：B avert。全文訳：当局は早期対処で深刻な飲料水不足を防げることを期待した。根拠：avert a crisis＝危機を未然に防ぐ。誤答：invoke／exacerbate／consolidate は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q11：C entrench。全文訳：審査はその政策が大企業と小規模供給業者の格差を固定化しかねないと指摘した。根拠：entrench inequalities＝不平等を根付かせる。誤答：allay／rectify／harmonize は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q12：D distill。全文訳：チームは研究結果を地域の学校向けの分かりやすい手引きに凝縮することにした。根拠：distill findings into a guide＝要点を抽出しまとめる。誤答：forfeit／dispute／invoke は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q13：A scrutinize。全文訳：議会は提案された道路の環境影響を精査するよう専門家へ委託した。根拠：scrutinize＝綿密に検討する。誤答：obviate／forfeit／recoup は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q14：B streamline。全文訳：新制度は安全対策を弱めず事務処理を効率化することを目的とする。根拠：streamline processing＝処理を合理化する。誤答：deplete／dispute／entrench は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q15：C resume。全文訳：損傷した部品を交換した後でなければ運転を再開できなかった。根拠：resume operations＝業務・運転を再開する。誤答：disaggregate／curtail／abrogate は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q16：D supersede。全文訳：新しい協定は法に合わなくなった旧指針に取って代わる。根拠：supersede＝旧いものに取って代わる。誤答：recoup／bolster／retain は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q17：A broker。全文訳：その事業は従来別々に活動してきた組織間の協力を取り持つことを目指す。根拠：broker cooperation＝協力を仲介する。誤答：withhold／exacerbate／dispute は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q18：B restore。全文訳：独立監査はデータ誤り発覚後の信頼回復に役立った。根拠：restore confidence＝信頼を回復する。誤答：preclude／deplete／disavow は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q19：C understated。全文訳：報告書は統計的関連と証明された原因の違いを過小評価していた。根拠：understate a difference＝違いを小さく表現する。誤答：obviated／ratified／recouped は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q20：D withhold。全文訳：当局は受給者が安全点検を終えるまで助成金を支給しないと決めた。根拠：withhold grants until …＝条件充足まで留保する。誤答：disseminate／bolster／reconcile は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q21：A recoup。全文訳：担当者は効率改善によって追加費用を徐々に回収する計画を立てた。根拠：recoup costs＝費用を取り戻す。誤答：forfeit／invoke／deplete は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
Q22：B disaggregate。全文訳：委員会は2施策の効果を分けて示す修正予測を求めた。根拠：disaggregate effects＝集計値を構成要素に分解する。誤答：scrutinize／consolidate／supersede は文脈の目的・結果を正しく表さない。
長文空所6問｜各文章の日本語解説と全24択の根拠
非常時の多言語案内と機械翻訳の限界・日本語全体解説
架空の地域政府は災害情報を多言語へ即時翻訳する。速度の利点はあるが、道路通行禁止の条件が誤訳され安全上危険となった。全文を毎回人手審査すると遅い可能性があるため、定型文の事前確認と例外的なメッセージの優先校閲を検討する。理解できても移動手段がなければ実行できないため、理解度・配信時間・実行可能性を検証する。
Q23：A the road could be used before the safety inspection ended。根拠：until an inspection was completed が逆に解釈されたことが問題。
- A：正答。until an inspection was completed が逆に解釈されたことが問題。
- B：永続的な全面閉鎖ではない。
- C：住民が中止したとは書かない。
- D：道路案内の誤訳が主題。
Q24：B how to allocate review effort according to risk and urgency。根拠：リスクの高い情報を優先校閲し、速度との両立を図る。
- A：すべての災害予測ではない。
- B：正答。リスクの高い情報を優先校閲し、速度との両立を図る。
- C：すべてを自動化する話ではない。
- D：多言語案内を維持する。
Q25：C evaluate whether people could understand and act on the warnings。根拠：理解と実際の避難行動の可能性を評価する。
- A：理解度を測る。
- B：速度だけではない。
- C：正答。理解と実際の避難行動の可能性を評価する。
- D：定型文は活用する。
古い木材の年代推定と考古学の解釈・日本語全体解説
架空の発掘で古い木材が見つかったが、古材が後の建物に再利用された可能性もあるため、木材の年代だけで大規模集落の存在は証明できない。土層・史料・地図の照合で複数の築造過程を検討し、測定日と解釈の暫定性を区別する展示を企画する。
Q26：D the age of a piece of wood does not by itself establish the history of the site。根拠：再利用木材の可能性と建物・集落の年代の違い。
- A：古材の再利用あり得る。
- B：地図も照合している。
- C：論理的におかしい。
- D：正答。再利用木材の可能性と建物・集落の年代の違い。
Q27：A certainty about the historical interpretation of the entire site。根拠：試料の精密測定と遺跡全体の歴史解釈の確実性は別。
- A：正答。試料の精密測定と遺跡全体の歴史解釈の確実性は別。
- B：道具の数ではない。
- C：試料の年代は既に測っている。
- D：公開の可否ではない。
Q28：B help visitors distinguish measured dates from tentative explanations。根拠：測定事実と仮説を分かるように伝える。
- A：不確実性は残る。
- B：正答。測定事実と仮説を分かるように伝える。
- C：報道の断定は疑わしい。
- D：一般公開予定。
長文内容一致7問｜各文章の日本語解説と全28択の根拠
長文内容一致A｜漁業の漁獲制限と小規模漁業者の生活・日本語全体解説
架空の沿岸政府は重要魚種の漁獲制限を検討する。資源保護が目的だが、大企業と小規模漁船では装備、港の選択肢、営業への影響が違う。港に水揚げされた数だけでは海上廃棄や漁獲努力量が不明なため独立調査が必要。過去の実績を基準とする配分は新規参入を妨げるかもしれず、魚種資源・漁業者の所得・遵守費用を含めて試行する。
Q29：C How catch limits must balance ecological goals with fair implementation and measurement.。根拠：資源保護と公正な配分・測定の複合的な問題が主題。
- A：データ収集は必要。
- B：恒久方式は未決定。
- C：正答。資源保護と公正な配分・測定の複合的な問題が主題。
- D：企業の立場を単純化できない。
Q30：A They depend on fewer ports and have less operational flexibility.。根拠：小規模事業者は港や漁場の選択肢が少ない。
- A：正答。小規模事業者は港や漁場の選択肢が少ない。
- B：全面禁止ではない。
- C：漁獲量の大小は書かれていない。
- D：補償が確定した記載なし。
Q31：D They focus on reported landings and may omit behavior at sea.。根拠：港での水揚げと海上での実際の漁業行動は異なる。
- A：海上廃棄は把握不足。
- B：所得は別指標。
- C：記録品質にばらつきあり。
- D：正答。港での水揚げと海上での実際の漁業行動は異なる。
長文内容一致B｜医療機器の修理基準と長期供給体制・日本語全体解説
架空の地域診療所ネットワークは検査機器の修理手順の共通化を検討する。文書の標準化は故障対応を早める可能性があるが、機種ごとの校正や危険度の違いを無視すると患者の安全に問題が生じる。低リスク作業とソフト・重要センサーの変更を分け、作業記録と性能確認を残す案がある。修理費の安さだけでなく、信頼性、責任、部品供給を評価してから限定試行を拡大する。
Q32：A To improve safe, accountable maintenance and continuity of medical services.。根拠：安全で責任が明確な保守と医療アクセスの継続が目的。
- A：正答。安全で責任が明確な保守と医療アクセスの継続が目的。
- B：機種が複数ある前提。
- C：リスクで作業を分ける。
- D：undefined
Q33：C Changes to critical components could affect measurement accuracy and patient safety.。根拠：計測精度・安全性に関わる調整があるため。
- A：通常のケーブル交換は許容候補。
- B：記録はむしろ提案する。
- C：正答。計測精度・安全性に関わる調整があるため。
- D：作業でリスクは異なる。
Q34：B Low-risk routine tasks versus high-risk changes requiring specialized review.。根拠：保守の危険度に応じた権限と検証の分離。
- A：機器の新旧だけではない。
- B：正答。保守の危険度に応じた権限と検証の分離。
- C：患者の国籍は無関係。
- D：時刻で判断しない。
Q35：D Initial price must be considered alongside reliability, responsibility and future support.。根拠：初期修理費だけでなく長期信頼性・責任・部品入手を比較。
- A：安さは安全の保証ではない。
- B：メーカー排除を目的としない。
- C：どちらが常に安いとも断定しない。
- D：正答。初期修理費だけでなく長期信頼性・責任・部品入手を比較。
このセットで復習したい論点
- 緊急案内の翻訳：速く訳せることは、安全に行動できることと同義ではない。
- 古材の年代：木材の推定年代と建造物・集落の成立年代を混同しない。
- 漁業政策：資源保護の目的だけでなく、負担配分・水揚げ以外の行動・監視制度を評価する。
- 医療機器の修理：低リスク作業と高リスク作業を分け、責任と点検の記録を残す。
FAQ｜英検1級Reading対策
英検1級Readingは合計何問ですか？
短文語句空所22問、長文空所6問、長文内容一致7問の計35問です。最新の正式形式は英検協会で確認してください。
語彙が分かっていても長文で間違える理由は？
単語だけでなく、主語・論理関係・事実と推測の区別が必要だからです。選択肢のall、definitely、alreadyなどの断定に気を付けてください。
この教材は公式過去問ですか？
いいえ。慶英会が独自作成した無料模試形式教材です。本番の過去問・試験時間への慣れは英検協会が公開する問題を併用してください。
次の教材へ進む
参考公式情報
英文・設問・選択肢・解答は慶英会が独自制作した非公式教材です。長文に登場する行政・遺跡・診療所・漁業政策は架空の設定です。日本語は段落ごとの内容解説であり逐語訳ではありません。
最大1か月完全無料体験・学習相談受付中
最大1か月の完全無料体験をご案内
学校教材・学力・目標に合わせた個別指導
入塾前に授業の進め方や講師との相性をお確かめください。
学校英語・定期テスト・英検の学習相談にも対応します。
保護者様の教育相談も無料で承ります。
1.学年 2. 学習目標 3.体験ご希望をお送りください。
体験の期間・回数・担当講師・日程は、ご希望と受付状況を確認してご案内します。
慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級。中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門としています。塾長の経歴・指導方針を確認する