慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門とするオンライン個別指導塾です。塾長紹介
結論：英検1級二次面接の2分スピーチでは、難しい英単語を並べることよりも、立場→独立した理由→具体的な説明→条件や反論→結論を順序よく述べることが重要です。慶英会は社会問題10テーマについて独自の英語模範スピーチ、各テーマの日本語内容訳、追質問20問と英語模範回答を制作しました。原稿の暗記で終わらず、1分間で論点を組み立て、2分の発話で自分の言葉にする練習に使ってください。
英検協会の1級二次試験は約10分の面接で、5つのトピックから一つを選ぶ考慮時間1分、スピーチ2分、関連するQ&Aが行われます。英検協会の公式試験内容をご確認ください。本記事の10テーマと英文は慶英会が独自に作成した練習例で、公式の出題テーマや採点例ではありません。発話速度・間の取り方は個人差があるため、原稿の語数が2分に必ず一致するとは限りません。
2分スピーチ模範からメモなし1分の模擬カードへ：5題カード×10回・独自50トピックとスピーチ模範10本。1分準備・2分発話・追質問まで連続して練習します。
2分スピーチを組み立てる共通の型
- 冒頭：賛成・反対・条件付き賛成など、質問への答えを明示する。
- 理由1：制度が誰にどんな影響を及ぼすか。
- 理由2：別の観点から意義やリスクを説明する。
- 理由3：実施可能性・費用・公平性など、前の理由と重複しない論点を加える。
- 反論と結論：現実的な制約を認めつつ、自分の立場に戻る。
英検1級の面接で単に長く話すことが目的ではありません。原稿はあくまで練習の土台です。実際には話の速さ・明瞭さ・間・文法と、質問に答えられるかを録音などで確認してください。
1. Should public libraries expand their digital services?｜模範199語
Public libraries should expand useful digital services while maintaining meaningful alternatives for people who cannot use them. The aim should be wider access to knowledge, not digitalization for its own sake.
First, digital catalogs and remote learning materials can help residents who cannot visit during normal opening hours. Students with long commutes and adults with family responsibilities may benefit from services available from home.
Second, well-designed digital systems can simplify routine tasks. Renewing a loan or checking whether a book is available need not always require a journey to the library. Staff could then devote more attention to people who need individual guidance.
Third, digital collections can make some rare materials easier to study without repeated handling of fragile originals. Clear descriptions of sources, however, are essential if readers are to interpret them responsibly.
Admittedly, residents have different levels of connectivity and digital confidence. An online-only service could exclude people whom libraries are meant to support. I would therefore retain targeted staff assistance and compare actual completion rates with operating costs.
In conclusion, I favor digital expansion that is evaluated by meaningful access, not simply website visits. Libraries should combine convenient technology with practical support for people facing barriers.
日本語での内容確認｜テーマ1
公共図書館は電子サービスを広げるべきだが、使えない人の代替手段を残すべきだ。第1に、開館時間に訪れられない人が在宅で資料を利用できる。第2に、貸出更新や蔵書検索などの定型業務を簡素化し、職員は個別支援に集中できる。第3に、傷みやすい資料の繰り返しの取扱いを減らし研究に役立つ。ただし通信・技能の格差がある。オンライン限定にはせず、実際に利用手続きが完了するかと費用で成果を測る。
追質問2問と模範英語回答
Q1：Would an online-only library be cheaper?
Answer：It might reduce some building costs, but it could also create exclusion and support expenses. A full cost comparison is needed.
Q2：How would you measure digital access?
Answer：I would examine successful task completion, the experience of nonusers, accessibility, and sustainable costs.
2. Should governments support independent local journalism?｜模範202語
Governments may have a legitimate role in supporting independent local journalism, provided that public funding does not give officials control over editorial decisions. Local reporting can help residents understand matters that rarely attract national attention.
First, reliable coverage of municipal budgets, schools, and public services supports informed debate. Without sustained scrutiny, important decisions may receive little attention from residents affected by them.
Second, smaller communities may struggle to maintain reporting organizations through advertising alone. Limited funding could support public-interest reporting or training, especially where commercial revenues are uncertain.
Third, different perspectives can improve accountability. A healthy information environment should allow residents to compare reporting and question official claims rather than accept one institutional narrative.
The strongest objection is the risk of political influence. If officials reward favorable coverage or threaten critical outlets with the loss of funding, the policy could undermine the independence it is intended to protect. That is why transparent eligibility rules, independent administration, and public reporting are essential.
Overall, I support narrowly designed assistance for local journalism, not government direction of the news. The success of a program should be judged by editorial independence, access to useful information, and public trust rather than the number of articles published alone.
日本語での内容確認｜テーマ2
政府による地域報道への支援には意義があるが、編集方針への介入は避けなければならない。第1に、自治体予算や学校・公共サービスの報道は市民の判断を支える。第2に、小規模地域では広告収入だけで取材活動を維持しにくい場合がある。第3に、複数の見方を示すことで行政への説明責任が生まれる。しかし公的資金は政治的介入を招く恐れがあるため、独立運営、透明な支給基準、公開報告が必要だ。記事数だけでなく独立性と情報へのアクセスで評価すべきである。
追質問2問と模範英語回答
Q3：How can a funding system avoid political pressure?
Answer：An independent body could use published eligibility rules and publicly explain decisions without evaluating whether coverage favors officials.
Q4：What evidence would justify continuing support?
Answer：I would assess access to verified local information, editorial independence, and operational sustainability, not publication totals alone.
3. Should endangered languages receive public support?｜模範192語
Public institutions should support endangered languages when the communities concerned wish to sustain them. Languages convey knowledge, identity, and ways of understanding the world that may be difficult to preserve through translation alone.
First, educational resources can help younger generations learn from fluent speakers. Community-led classes and recordings may provide opportunities that are not available through ordinary school curricula.
Second, language preservation can support cultural continuity. Stories, local place names, and traditional forms of expression may contain meanings that require knowledge of the original language.
Third, a wider range of languages enriches academic and public understanding. Researchers can learn from different approaches to storytelling and classification, provided that they work respectfully with the people who maintain those traditions.
However, preservation should not become a project imposed by outsiders. Some materials may be sensitive, and communities must have a meaningful voice in deciding how language records are used. Funding should also reflect local priorities rather than assume that one model suits every group.
For these reasons, I support carefully designed public assistance for endangered languages. The goal should be voluntary use and intergenerational learning, not merely the creation of a large digital collection.
日本語での内容確認｜テーマ3
話者の地域社会が望むなら、消滅の危機にある言語を公的に支えるべきだ。第1に、地域主導の授業や録音で若い世代への継承を助けられる。第2に、物語・地名など原語に依存する文化的な意味を守れる。第3に、異なる言語の知識は研究や公共理解を豊かにする。ただし外部の人が一方的に保存方法を決めず、機微な資料の扱いと地域の意思を尊重する。単なるデータ量でなく、自発的な利用と世代間の学習を成果とすべきである。
追質問2問と模範英語回答
Q5：What if young people are not interested in learning the language?
Answer：Participation should remain voluntary. Local groups could offer flexible opportunities and find out what learners actually value.
Q6：Would digital recordings be enough?
Answer：No. Recordings can preserve examples, but living use often requires teaching, conversation, and community participation.
4. Should university admissions rely more heavily on interviews?｜模範195語
University interviews can provide valuable information about applicants, but I would not make them the dominant basis for admission. A balanced process should assess academic preparation and personal motivation without placing excessive weight on a short conversation.
First, interviews allow candidates to explain experiences that written grades may not capture. Applicants can discuss their academic interests and how they respond to unfamiliar questions.
Second, interviews may reveal communication skills relevant to certain programs. However, these skills should be assessed against clearly stated requirements rather than vague impressions of confidence.
Third, different types of evidence can compensate for one another’s limitations. Written work, prior academic performance, and structured conversations may provide a more complete picture than any single measure.
The main concern is fairness. Students who can afford coaching or who are naturally comfortable in formal conversations may perform better even when their academic potential is similar to that of other candidates. Unstructured interviews can also encourage inconsistent judgments.
Therefore, I support interviews as one component of admissions, with transparent questions, trained evaluators, and documented criteria. Universities should investigate whether their methods predict relevant academic outcomes instead of assuming that impressive interview performance guarantees future success.
日本語での内容確認｜テーマ4
大学入試の面接は有用だが、合否の中心的な唯一の根拠にすべきではない。第1に、成績表に表れない志望理由や経験を説明できる。第2に、学部に関係する説明力を測れることもある。第3に、成績・提出物・構造化された面接を組み合わせれば、単独指標の弱点を補える。ただし面接対策に使える費用や話し慣れの差が公平性に影響する。質問、評価基準、担当者の研修を明確化し、その方式が本当に学業上の成果を予測するか検証すべきだ。
追質問2問と模範英語回答
Q7：How could universities reduce interview bias?
Answer：They could use structured questions, published criteria, trained interviewers, and checks for inconsistent scoring.
Q8：What would you do for an applicant who is nervous?
Answer：I would allow appropriate preparation and assess the content of their reasoning rather than confidence alone.
5. Can green roofs solve urban heat problems?｜模範200語
Green roofs can contribute to managing urban heat, but they cannot solve every heat-related problem by themselves. Cities should treat them as one possible measure within a broader strategy.
First, vegetation may provide shade and change heat conditions around suitable buildings. The benefit, however, depends on local climate, design, and maintenance rather than the simple presence of plants.
Second, green roofs can create opportunities for urban biodiversity when appropriate species and habitats are used. They may also encourage people to think about the environmental performance of buildings.
Third, a well-designed project could complement street trees, accessible public spaces, and other approaches. Different neighborhoods have different building structures and levels of exposure, so a single design is unlikely to be suitable everywhere.
Critics reasonably point out that installing and maintaining rooftop vegetation can be expensive. Some buildings may require structural assessment, while water availability can constrain performance during dry periods. These costs must be considered before broad expansion.
In conclusion, I support carefully evaluated green-roof projects where they are safe and appropriate. Officials should compare measured benefits, maintenance needs, and accessibility with other cooling options. The objective is lower exposure to heat, not simply the greatest possible number of vegetated roofs.
日本語での内容確認｜テーマ5
屋上緑化は都市の暑さ対策に寄与し得るが、単独で全てを解決するわけではない。第1に、適切な建物では日陰や周辺の熱環境の改善が期待されるが設計・維持管理が影響する。第2に、適切な植生は都市の生物多様性に役立つ場合がある。第3に、街路樹や公共施設など別の対策を補完できる。しかし構造上の安全性、水、保守費用の問題がある。設置件数だけでなく実際の効果と他の手段との比較に基づき導入すべきだ。
追質問2問と模範英語回答
Q9：Why not make green roofs compulsory everywhere?
Answer：Some structures may be unsuitable or too costly to modify safely. A universal requirement would ignore those differences.
Q10：How would you measure success?
Answer：I would examine local heat conditions, maintenance costs, building safety, and how the project compares with alternatives.
6. Should companies disclose more information about supply chains?｜模範194語
Companies should disclose meaningful information about their supply chains, while protecting sensitive details where disclosure would create serious risks. Transparency can help customers and other stakeholders evaluate how products are produced.
First, clearer information may reveal where a company depends on a small number of suppliers. Such knowledge can support planning for disruptions and encourage more responsible business decisions.
Second, disclosure can improve accountability. When firms describe how they assess working conditions or environmental impacts, their claims can be examined rather than accepted solely on trust.
Third, comparable reporting can help buyers distinguish companies that investigate risks from those that make broad promises without supporting evidence. The quality of the information matters more than the volume of material published.
Admittedly, tracing complex international supply chains can be expensive, especially for smaller firms. Some commercial or security-related details cannot be made public without caution. A sensible policy could therefore focus first on significant risks, clear definitions, and proportionate reporting requirements.
Overall, I favor useful supply-chain disclosure supported by independent verification where practical. Governments and companies should assess whether reporting improves decisions and reduces serious risks, not assume that a long document automatically demonstrates responsible conduct.
日本語での内容確認｜テーマ6
企業は重要なサプライチェーン情報をより開示すべきだが、機密情報の保護も必要だ。第1に、特定の仕入先への依存を把握し供給途絶に備えられる。第2に、労働条件や環境影響の説明責任を高める。第3に、消費者や取引先が根拠のある取組と空虚な約束を区別しやすくなる。ただし複雑な流通経路の追跡は高費用で、営業・安全上の機密も存在する。重大なリスクを優先し、必要に応じて独立検証を行い、報告量ではなく実際の改善を評価する。
追質問2問と模範英語回答
Q11：Could disclosure be too expensive for small businesses?
Answer：Yes. Requirements should be proportionate and focus on material risks rather than impose the same reporting burden on every firm.
Q12：What would make a supply-chain report credible?
Answer：Clear definitions, traceable sources, honest disclosure of limitations, and appropriate independent checks would improve credibility.
7. Will remote work necessarily revive regional economies?｜模範197語
Remote work can create opportunities for regional communities, but it will not automatically revive every local economy. Its effects depend on housing, connectivity, public services, and whether workers can establish sustainable relationships with the places where they live.
First, remote work may allow some employees to live farther from major offices. That could create new demand for local services in areas with suitable transport and digital infrastructure.
Second, flexible work may help certain residents balance employment with family responsibilities. However, the benefits are not equally available because many occupations still require physical attendance.
Third, regional development depends on more than relocating individuals. Schools, healthcare, reliable connections, and opportunities for local businesses matter if a community is to retain residents over time.
An important objection is that a rise in newcomers may increase housing pressure without providing stable benefits to existing residents. Local authorities should therefore evaluate affordability and service capacity rather than treating population growth as proof of prosperity.
For these reasons, I regard remote work as one possible contributor to regional development. Its success should be assessed through long-term access to jobs, the quality of local services, and the experiences of both new and existing residents.
日本語での内容確認｜テーマ7
遠隔勤務は地域経済に機会をもたらすが、すべての地域を自動的に再生するわけではない。第1に、大都市の職場から離れて暮らせる人が増え、地域サービスへの需要が生じ得る。第2に、一定の職種では家庭と仕事の両立を助ける。ただし現場勤務が必須の職業もある。第3に、定住には学校・医療・交通・地元産業なども重要だ。転入者が増えると住宅費への圧力が生じる場合もあるため、人口増だけでなく雇用・生活サービスと住民の経験で評価すべきだ。
追質問2問と模範英語回答
Q13：What might limit the benefits of remote work?
Answer：Weak connectivity, limited public services, housing costs, and occupations requiring physical attendance could all limit them.
Q14：How should a town assess its policy?
Answer：It should examine sustained employment, housing affordability, local service capacity, and outcomes for existing residents.
8. Should museums return culturally significant objects to their places of origin?｜模範192語
Museums should seriously consider returning culturally significant objects when there are strong ethical or legal grounds, but decisions should be based on careful investigation rather than a universal formula.
First, communities connected with an object may have important interests in how it is displayed, studied, and used. Their perspectives should form part of any responsible decision.
Second, provenance matters. Museums need to investigate how an object changed hands, whether relevant consent was given, and which claims can be supported by reliable records. Incomplete archives do not justify pretending that difficult questions have been answered.
Third, cooperation can support better cultural understanding. Return, shared exhibitions, research partnerships, and appropriate access arrangements may all have roles depending on the circumstances.
However, these cases can involve competing claims, conservation concerns, and different legal frameworks. Museums should not automatically assume that every object has the same history or that one institution can speak for every community concerned.
For these reasons, I favor transparent, case-by-case decisions that involve relevant communities and independent expertise. Success should not be measured solely by the number of objects moved, but by respectful treatment, responsible preservation, and meaningful access to cultural heritage.
日本語での内容確認｜テーマ8
博物館は倫理的・法的根拠が強い場合に重要な文化財の返還を真剣に検討すべきだが、すべてを一律に判断するのは不適切だ。第1に、対象の文化財とつながる地域社会の意思を尊重する。第2に、取得の経緯や同意を資料に基づいて調べる。第3に、返還だけでなく共同展示・研究などの協力も考えられる。ただし保存上の課題や異なる法制度、競合する主張がある。関係する地域社会と専門家を交え、透明な個別判断を行うべきである。
追質問2問と模範英語回答
Q15：Would returning an object always be the best solution?
Answer：Not necessarily. The appropriate arrangement depends on provenance, community priorities, preservation, and relevant law.
Q16：How can museums deal with incomplete records?
Answer：They should identify what is known, disclose uncertainty, consult relevant communities, and avoid presenting assumptions as facts.
9. Should affordable transport be prioritized over frequent service?｜模範190語
Affordable fares matter, but they should not be prioritized in a way that makes public transport unreliable or inaccessible. I would evaluate prices, frequency, and route coverage together rather than treat them as unrelated choices.
First, high fares can prevent people on limited incomes from making necessary journeys. Targeted financial support may therefore improve access for some residents.
Second, a low fare is of little help if the final bus leaves before a worker finishes a shift. Frequency and schedules must reflect when people need to travel.
Third, transport systems need adequate funding for safe and dependable operation. If discounts significantly reduce revenue without other support, fewer services could offset the benefit of cheaper tickets.
Admittedly, public budgets are limited, and not every route can run continuously. Officials should compare different combinations of subsidies and service changes, with attention to people who currently cannot use the system.
Overall, I favor affordable transport as part of a reliable network, not as an isolated promise. The best measure of success is whether residents can complete essential journeys at reasonable cost. Passenger numbers are useful, but they should not be the only indicator.
日本語での内容確認｜テーマ9
安い運賃は重要だが、頻度や路線範囲を犠牲にすべきではない。第1に、低所得者には値下げが必要な移動の助けになる。第2に、最終便が勤務終了前に出てしまえば安くても乗れない。第3に、安全で信頼できる運行には財源が必要だ。予算制約があるため、運賃補助と時刻表・路線変更を組み合わせて比較し、以前利用できなかった人が必要な移動を完了できるかで成果を判断する。
追質問2問と模範英語回答
Q17：Would free public transport solve exclusion?
Answer：It might remove a price barrier, but problems with schedules, distance, and accessibility could remain.
Q18：Which data would you use to evaluate a discount?
Answer：I would consider necessary journeys completed, service reliability, access among nonusers, and sustainable costs.
10. Should citizen science contribute to public policy decisions?｜模範194語
Citizen science can provide valuable information for public policy when its methods and limitations are carefully evaluated. Community participation may reveal local conditions that a small professional team would otherwise overlook.
First, volunteers can collect observations across a wide range of places and times. Their participation may improve the geographic coverage of certain projects and encourage interest in public issues.
Second, citizen science can create opportunities for learning. Participants may develop a better understanding of how observations are recorded and why results require interpretation.
Third, the process can strengthen communication between residents and specialists. Public decisions may benefit when local concerns are discussed alongside technical evidence.
The main risk is data quality. Volunteers may use different equipment, follow different procedures, or report only locations they can easily reach. These differences can produce bias even when everyone acts in good faith. Training, clear documentation, and comparisons with professional measurements are therefore necessary.
In conclusion, I support citizen science as one source of evidence, not as an automatic substitute for expert assessment. The value of a project should depend on reliability, responsible participation, and its contribution to decisions, rather than the total number of observations alone.
日本語での内容確認｜テーマ10
市民参加型の科学調査は、方法と限界を評価するなら政策に役立つ。第1に、専門家だけでは調査しにくい地点や時間帯の観測を集められる。第2に、参加者が記録と解釈の技能を学べる。第3に、住民と専門家の対話を促す。ただし機器・手順・調査地点の偏りによりデータ品質が不均一になる可能性がある。研修・記録の統一・専門測定との比較を行い、観測数ではなく信頼性と意思決定への貢献で成果を測る。
追質問2問と模範英語回答
Q19：Can volunteer data replace professional monitoring?
Answer：Not automatically. It can complement expert work, but reliability needs documented methods and suitable comparisons.
Q20：How would you reduce sampling bias?
Answer：I would review which locations are underrepresented and use standardized training and procedures before drawing broad conclusions.
スピーチで使いやすい12の接続表現
1. I support this policy, provided that …：条件付きの立場を示す。
2. The first reason is that …：第一の理由を明示。
3. Another consideration is …：異なる観点を追加。
4. This matters because …：因果・意義を説明。
5. For example, consider a situation in which …：仮想例として示す。
6. The benefit would depend on …：条件を示して断定を避ける。
7. It would be misleading to assume that …：過剰な一般化を修正。
8. A reasonable concern is that …：反論を認める。
9. Nevertheless, …：反論の後で立場に戻る。
10. I would evaluate this by examining …：評価指標を示す。
11. This does not necessarily mean that …：結論の限界を明示。
12. For these reasons, I would favor …：理由と結論を結ぶ。
7日間の練習計画
- 1日目：テーマ1・2。デジタル公共サービスと報道の独立性。
- 2日目：テーマ3・4。地域言語と大学面接の公平性。
- 3日目：テーマ5・6。屋上緑化と企業情報の透明性。
- 4日目：テーマ7・8。遠隔勤務と文化財の返還。
- 5日目：テーマ9・10。公共交通と市民科学。
- 6日目：10テーマからランダムに5題を選び、1分で構成メモを作る。
- 7日目：台本を見ずに2分間話し、各テーマの追質問へ回答して録音・自己修正する。
FAQ｜英検1級二次試験
この10のスピーチを暗記すれば合格できますか？
暗記だけでは不十分です。本番では別のトピックが提示され、スピーチ内容に関連する質問も出ます。論点を転用し、自分の言葉で理由と具体例を説明する練習が必要です。
2分間のスピーチは何語を目安にすべきですか？
公式が語数を指定しているわけではありません。自分の発話速度と明瞭さに合わせて調整し、2分間の時間枠で論理が完結するよう練習します。
実在の統計をすぐに示せないときは？
数字を創作せず、仮想例や一般的な仕組み、実施の条件を示しましょう。主張の確実性は手元にある根拠に合わせます。
関連する慶英会の無料教材
社会問題の論点を短時間で整理できない場合は、慶英会の最大1か月無料体験・学習相談をご利用ください。
参考にした主な公式情報
10テーマのスピーチ、和訳、追質問と模範回答は慶英会独自制作の学習教材です。
最大1か月完全無料体験・学習相談受付中
最大1か月の完全無料体験をご案内
学校教材・学力・目標に合わせた個別指導
入塾前に授業の進め方や講師との相性をお確かめください。
学校英語・定期テスト・英検の学習相談にも対応します。
保護者様の教育相談も無料で承ります。
1.学年 2. 学習目標 3.体験ご希望をお送りください。
体験の期間・回数・担当講師・日程は、ご希望と受付状況を確認してご案内します。
慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級。中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門としています。塾長の経歴・指導方針を確認する