慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門とするオンライン個別指導塾です。塾長紹介
英検1級Listening 第22セット｜慶英会独自の無料練習。 Part1会話10問、Part2説明文10問、Part3 Real-Life5問、Part4インタビュー2問の全27問・108択と、すべての英文台本・要点和訳・解答と根拠を掲載します。録音音声は付属しないテキスト教材です。初回は台本を隠し、読み上げ役または英語の読み上げ機能で1回だけ聴いてください。
英検協会の公式Listeningは会話10・説明文10・Real-Life5・インタビュー2問で、各放送は1回です（英検協会・1級試験内容）。本ページは慶英会独自に作成したもので、公式音源・過去問ではありません。音質や実際の放送速度の練習には公式過去問・音源を併用してください。
次の独自Listening全27問：英検1級Listening第23セット｜Part1〜4・27問・全108択と英文台本。初回は台本を隠して一度聞き、解答後に要点訳を確認してください。録音音声は付属しません。
27問の学び方
- Part1：最終決定・承認範囲・条件・例外を聴き分ける。
- Part2：測定・解釈・追加検証を区別する。
- Part3：Situationの必須条件を先読みし、1条件でも外れる選択肢を消去する。
- Part4：話者の最終的な立場と、例外を含む理由を押さえる。
- 初回は台本を見ずに回答し、2回目以降に台本・要点訳で失点原因を検証する。
Part1｜会話10問と独自英文台本
会話1
Q1. What will the organizers do?
- A. Keep the lecture upstairs regardless of lift access.
- B. Cancel the lecture entirely.
- C. Use an accessible ground-floor room and provide a remote option.
- D. Ask guests with mobility needs not to attend.
読み上げ用台本（初回は見ない）：Woman: The guest lecture is moving to the third floor. Will the lift be working? Man: Engineers cannot guarantee that by tomorrow. Woman: Some guests need step-free access. Man: Then we should use the smaller room on the ground floor, even if we have to limit the number of seats. Woman: I’ll revise the invitations and offer remote viewing to people who cannot attend.
会話2
Q2. What concerns the woman?
- A. The responses do not yet establish widespread support or representativeness.
- B. The questionnaire contained no questions.
- C. The town had no residents.
- D. The survey had been completed by all households.
読み上げ用台本（初回は見ない）：Man: The survey has received more than eight hundred replies. Can we call the proposal popular? Woman: We have not examined how many responses support it, and the link was mainly shared among existing members. Man: So even a high response rate might not represent the whole town. Woman: Exactly. We need the distribution of views and a clear account of who was invited.
会話3
Q3. Why is the projector not ready for lending?
- A. Its image quality is known to be poor.
- B. The library has sold it.
- C. The borrower canceled the reservation.
- D. A full electrical safety check is still required.
読み上げ用台本（初回は見ない）：Woman: The portable projector works again after the repair. Can we lend it out immediately? Man: Not until it passes the full electrical inspection. The technician only confirmed that the image appears. Woman: Then I’ll keep the reservation tentative and tell the borrower when we have a safety report. Man: Good. We shouldn’t treat a functioning display as proof that every component is safe.
会話4
Q4. What should the man do?
- A. Wait until the course begins.
- B. Submit the online form by Tuesday and retain confirmation.
- C. Send another phone message after the deadline.
- D. Buy a new course to obtain a refund.
読み上げ用台本（初回は見ない）：Man: I canceled my enrollment by phone yesterday. Can I expect the full refund? Woman: Our policy requires the cancellation form to be submitted online by Tuesday evening. A phone message doesn’t count as a formal request. Man: But today is only Monday. Woman: In that case, you can still submit the form before the deadline and keep the confirmation number.
会話5
Q5. What does the man advise?
- A. Claiming the painting now matches its original appearance exactly.
- B. Removing all labels from the painting.
- C. Explaining restoration work and remaining uncertainty.
- D. Repainting it using modern colors without documentation.
読み上げ用台本（初回は見ない）：Woman: Our museum’s restored painting looks brighter. Does that prove the colors were originally vivid? Man: Not necessarily. Cleaning has removed later varnish, but the pigments may have changed over time. Woman: Then the label should say what conservators did and what remains uncertain. Man: Exactly. We should not describe a modern appearance as a perfect reconstruction of the past.
会話6
Q6. What is the problem with the translation?
- A. It changes a possible requirement into a universal obligation.
- B. It contains too many examples of optional documents.
- C. It eliminates the need for any forms.
- D. It uses only words from another dialect.
読み上げ用台本（初回は見ない）：Man: The translated notice says every family must bring two documents, but the English version says some families may need extra papers. Woman: That’s a serious difference. The translation has turned a possibility into a requirement. Man: Should we send it anyway and correct it later? Woman: No. Let’s have the translator revise it before distribution.
会話7
Q7. Which decision has been made?
- A. All activities are canceled permanently.
- B. The event will be held outside whatever the weather.
- C. The open-flame demonstration will take place inside.
- D. An indoor alternative will be prepared, with one activity replaced.
読み上げ用台本（初回は見ない）：Woman: The outdoor science event was planned for Saturday. Should we cancel it because rain is expected? Man: The forecast is uncertain, and the indoor hall is available. Woman: Then we can move the experiments inside if necessary. Man: Yes, but the demonstration using open flames cannot be held there. We’ll replace that activity and announce the final plan on Friday.
会話8
Q8. What has the grant committee approved?
- A. Equipment purchases, but not yet training costs.
- B. All training courses and staff travel.
- C. A permanent increase in staff salaries.
- D. Only advertising for the sensor project.
読み上げ用台本（初回は見ない）：Man: The grant was approved to purchase sensors, so we can pay for training from the same funds, right? Woman: No. The approved budget covers equipment only. The training proposal is still under review. Man: I’ll prepare a separate schedule and cost estimate. Woman: Please do, and don’t announce training dates until the additional approval arrives.
会話9
Q9. What evaluation would be more useful?
- A. Counting page views without asking about understanding.
- B. Testing whether students can compare sources and explain evidence.
- C. Assuming all volunteers represent every student.
- D. Replacing the project with advertisements.
読み上げ用台本（初回は見ない）：Woman: Our documentary website has more visitors since the school project began. Is that proof students learned more? Man: It tells us they accessed the site, but not what they understood. Woman: We could ask them to compare sources and explain their answers. Man: That would be more informative, especially if we avoid treating a few enthusiastic volunteers as representative of every student.
会話10
Q10. What is the woman’s main point?
- A. Every old bus should be discarded immediately.
- B. Reusing all vehicles is always cheaper.
- C. Vehicle reuse should depend on safety, standards and lifetime costs.
- D. The city has already completed all upgrades.
読み上げ用台本（初回は見ない）：Man: Can the city reuse the old buses after replacing their engines? Woman: Perhaps, but we should check whether accessibility and emissions standards can be met. Man: Reusing vehicles would save construction materials. Woman: Possibly, yet upgrading an unsafe vehicle would not necessarily be economical. We need lifetime cost and safety assessments before choosing.
Part1の解答・和訳・誤答根拠
Q1 正答 C：Use an accessible ground-floor room and provide a remote option. 和訳：講演会は3階へ移す予定だったがエレベーターが使える保証がない。段差なしの地上階会場に変更し定員を調整、来られない人には遠隔視聴を案内。 根拠：ground-floor room / remote viewing。3階での継続ではない。
Q2 正答 A：The responses do not yet establish widespread support or representativeness. 和訳：回答800件でも賛否の内訳を調べておらず、案内が既存会員に偏っている。参加数と支持の割合や代表性は別。 根拠：views distributionとrecruitmentが未検証。
Q3 正答 D：A full electrical safety check is still required. 和訳：修理後に映像は映るが電気安全検査は未完。貸出確定は安全報告後まで保留。 根拠：image appearsとsafety inspectionは別。
Q4 正答 B：Submit the online form by Tuesday and retain confirmation. 和訳：電話キャンセルは正式手続ではなく、火曜夕方までにオンラインフォーム送信と確認番号が必要。今日は月曜なので期限内。 根拠：formal online form / confirmation number。
Q5 正答 C：Explaining restoration work and remaining uncertainty. 和訳：絵画修復後の色は鮮やかだが、顔料も経年変化しており元の色の証明ではない。修復内容と残る不確実性をラベルへ明記。 根拠：what conservators did / remains uncertain。
Q6 正答 A：It changes a possible requirement into a universal obligation. 和訳：原文「一部の家庭は追加書類が必要かもしれない」が訳文で「全家庭必須」になった。可能性を義務に変える重大な誤訳なので配布前に修正。 根拠：may→must、some→everyへの意味の強化。
Q7 正答 D：An indoor alternative will be prepared, with one activity replaced. 和訳：土曜の屋外科学イベントは雨の可能性があるため必要なら屋内移動。ただし炎を使う実験は屋内ではできないので別活動に変更し金曜に最終案内。 根拠：indoor fallback / replace flame demonstration。
Q8 正答 A：Equipment purchases, but not yet training costs. 和訳：助成金はセンサー購入のみ承認、職員研修は別審査。研修の予定と見積を準備し承認前の日時告知を控える。 根拠：approved budget covers equipment only。
Q9 正答 B：Testing whether students can compare sources and explain evidence. 和訳：サイト閲覧数増は学習理解の証明ではない。生徒に資料比較・理由説明をさせ、熱心な少人数を全生徒の代表として扱わない。 根拠：compare sources and explain answers＝理解を直接評価。
Q10 正答 C：Vehicle reuse should depend on safety, standards and lifetime costs. 和訳：旧バス再利用の可能性はあるが排出ガス・段差なしアクセス・安全性・生涯費用の確認が必要。資材節約だけで再利用を決めない。 根拠：lifetime costs and safety before choosing。
慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
塾長の経歴・指導方針
中高一貫校の英語・定期テスト・英検の学習状況を整理し、必要な復習の優先順位を考えたい方は、無料体験・学習相談のご案内をご確認ください。最大1か月完全無料体験の対象・回数・担当講師は、お申し込み時にご案内します。
友だち追加後、学年・教材・困っていることと「学習相談希望（ブログ・記事中盤）」をお送りください。LINEを開くだけでは受付は完了しません。LINEを利用できない方はメールでの学習相談も可能です。料金・無料体験の期間と条件はコース・料金・無料体験のご案内でご確認ください。
Part2｜説明文5題・10問と台本
説明文1｜地域の海岸観察
Q11. Why did researchers question the claim of more dangerous tides?
- A. Volunteers were forbidden from visiting beaches.
- B. The app could increase detection and reporting without a real change in tide frequency.
- C. The council had deleted previous tide records.
- D. All reports came from instruments that were deliberately broken.
Q12. What did the council decide?
- A. To remove safety rules immediately.
- B. To prohibit all future volunteer observations.
- C. To fund further monitoring before changing regulations.
- D. To treat every unusual report as proof of a permanent trend.
読み上げ用台本：An imaginary coastal research group introduced a smartphone application for reporting unusual tides. Volunteers submitted many observations, and the project gained media attention. Some local officials argued that the rise in reports showed that dangerous tides had become more frequent. Researchers explained that the application made reporting easier, so more observations could reflect improved detection rather than a change in nature. The volunteers also concentrated near popular beaches, leaving less visited sections underrepresented. To improve the evidence, the group proposed fixed observation sites, consistent reporting times, and comparisons with established tide records. It also warned that a single unusual measurement should not be treated as a long-term trend. The coastal council agreed to fund further monitoring before revising safety rules. The project remained useful for identifying events that deserved investigation, but it had not established that tide hazards were increasing.
説明文2｜市民図書館のデジタルアーカイブ
Q13. What did staff do about contradictory dates?
- A. They distinguished verified information from estimates and documented corrections.
- B. They declared every date perfectly reliable.
- C. They removed all digital photographs.
- D. They prevented teachers from using historical materials.
Q14. Why was unrestricted publication of donated letters questioned?
- A. Libraries were forbidden to store letters.
- B. Letters were always produced by the government.
- C. Every letter was a forgery.
- D. Ownership of a record did not automatically provide consent for public online access.
読み上げ用台本：A fictional library network digitized early photographs of local streets to make them available for classroom use. The collection grew quickly, but cataloguers discovered that some original labels contained contradictory dates. Rather than delete every uncertain entry, staff identified which details were verified and which were estimates. They also added links to documents explaining how earlier interpretations had changed. Teachers reported that students enjoyed the images, but researchers warned that enjoyment did not prove improved historical reasoning. A school pilot therefore asked learners to compare photos with newspaper reports and explain conflicting evidence. In addition, the library reviewed privacy concerns in personal letters donated by families. A record’s presence in the collection did not necessarily mean that the donor had approved unrestricted online publication. The network decided to evaluate comprehension and consent procedures before making the entire collection searchable.
説明文3｜大学設備の共同予約
Q15. Why were booking totals an unreliable productivity measure?
- A. Every instrument had been permanently removed.
- B. The new calendar prohibited reservations.
- C. Some bookings were repeated or canceled without completed experiments.
- D. Research outputs had already doubled.
Q16. What did technicians address?
- A. Inconsistent calibration standards among laboratories.
- B. The lack of any available internet connection.
- C. A plan to close all laboratories.
- D. An agreement to abandon all shared equipment.
読み上げ用台本：An imaginary university consortium introduced a booking service for expensive laboratory instruments. Reservations increased after the online calendar was launched, and administrators initially celebrated the system as a productivity improvement. Evaluators pointed out that some research teams booked several slots for a single project, while maintenance sometimes forced cancellations. Higher reservations therefore did not establish that more experiments had been completed. The consortium proposed tracking actual instrument use, unsuccessful sessions, and whether small institutions received fair access. Another concern involved calibration: laboratories had previously recorded measurements using different reference standards, so combining their results could create misleading comparisons. Technicians developed shared procedures and training. The board approved a limited continuation with stricter recording rather than immediate expansion. It would assess research outputs and running costs before purchasing additional equipment.
説明文4｜自治体の冷房避難室
Q17. Why did rising attendance not establish equitable access?
- A. All facilities were in remote areas.
- B. Every resident had visited a room.
- C. The indoor temperature had never been measured.
- D. Residents in outlying districts faced transport barriers.
Q18. What additional information was requested?
- A. Only the opinions of frequent visitors.
- B. Access barriers and experiences of people who had not used the service.
- C. Only the number of posters printed.
- D. A guarantee that the service would never cost money.
読み上げ用台本：A fictional municipality tested public cooling rooms during a period of unusually high temperatures. Attendance increased after posters were distributed, prompting some officials to call the service a proven success. However, several rooms were close to railway stations, while outlying districts had limited transport. Evaluators cautioned that attendance counts could not establish equitable access. The city also shortened waiting times at certain clinics during the same period, potentially altering where people chose to rest. Researchers recommended measuring indoor conditions, transport barriers, operating costs, and the experiences of residents who had not visited the shelters. They warned that surveying visitors alone would miss many people who could not reach the facilities. The city authorized a longer accessibility review and postponed any citywide expansion until the evidence was available.
説明文5｜職業講座の成果指標
Q19. What was the problem with the reported employment improvement?
- A. Registration did not demonstrate distinct trained people or actual jobs.
- B. The program had no registrants.
- C. All participants refused assessment.
- D. The authority had already recorded employment for every applicant.
Q20. What did reviewers propose?
- A. Reporting only promotional reach.
- B. Stopping every course permanently.
- C. Measuring enrollment, withdrawals, practical skills, and later employment separately.
- D. Assuming all rural residents had reliable internet.
読み上げ用台本：An imaginary workforce program introduced short online courses and attracted far more registrants after a public advertising campaign. Officials described the increase as evidence that the program was improving employment prospects. Independent reviewers disagreed with that interpretation. Some applicants had registered for multiple courses, while others stopped attending before the final assessment. Registrations could therefore not establish the number of distinct people who acquired skills, much less the number who found jobs. Researchers proposed reporting enrollment, withdrawals, practical assessment results, and later employment separately. They also asked whether people without stable internet access could use the program. Rather than claim failure or success prematurely, the authority approved follow-up research and a small face-to-face alternative in rural areas.
Part2の全10問の解答・要点和訳
要点和訳：架空の海岸グループがアプリで潮位報告を募集。報告数は増えたが、報告の容易さと人気海岸への偏りで危険潮位の増加とは断定できない。固定地点・同一時刻・既存潮位記録で追加検証し、規則改訂は保留。
Q11 正答 B：The app could increase detection and reporting without a real change in tide frequency. 報告しやすさが検出件数に影響する。
Q12 正答 C：To fund further monitoring before changing regulations. fund further monitoring before revising rules。
要点和訳：架空の図書館が街路写真をデジタル化した。日付が矛盾する目録を消すのでなく、確認済み・推定と訂正履歴を区別した。楽しさと史料読解力は別なので比較課題で検証する。寄贈手紙の一般公開には同意確認が必要。全面検索化前に理解と同意を評価する。
Q13 正答 A：They distinguished verified information from estimates and documented corrections. verified / estimates / correction links。
Q14 正答 D：Ownership of a record did not automatically provide consent for public online access. donated recordとpublic consentは別。
要点和訳：架空の大学連合が研究機器を共同予約。予約数増は複数予約や保守中止があるため実験完了の増加を意味しない。実利用・失敗・小研究室のアクセスを測る。校正基準も統一し、全面拡大前に費用と成果を評価する。
Q15 正答 C：Some bookings were repeated or canceled without completed experiments. 予約と実験完了の違い。
Q16 正答 A：Inconsistent calibration standards among laboratories. shared calibration procedures。
要点和訳：架空の市の冷房避難室は利用者が増えたが駅に近い施設へ偏り、全地区の公平なアクセスは不明。他のサービス変更も利用行動を変えた可能性。非利用者の意見と交通・費用を評価し、全面拡大は先送り。
Q17 正答 D：Residents in outlying districts faced transport barriers. 交通に不利な地区の人を利用者数は捉えない。
Q18 正答 B：Access barriers and experiences of people who had not used the service. nonusers / transport barriers。
要点和訳：架空のオンライン職業講座は登録増を就職改善と宣伝したが、重複登録と途中離脱がある。人数・修了・実技・就職を分けて測り、ネット困難者向け対面試行を追加。成功・失敗の断定は保留。
Q19 正答 A：Registration did not demonstrate distinct trained people or actual jobs. 登録と技能・就職成果は別。
Q20 正答 C：Measuring enrollment, withdrawals, practical skills, and later employment separately. 指標を分離して測定。
Part3｜Real-Life独自5場面・5問
Situation 1
Situation: You need an in-person training course on Sunday for no more than $35. You also need a completion certificate.
Q21. Which course meets all the requirements?
- A. Evidence Workshop.
- B. Field Research Course.
- C. Statistical Methods Course.
- D. Public Lecture.
読み上げ用アナウンス：Our center has four options. The Evidence Workshop meets online on Sunday for twenty dollars and provides certificates. The Field Research Course meets in person on Sunday, costs thirty-two dollars, and awards certificates after the practical exercise. The Statistical Methods Course meets in person on Saturday for thirty dollars and includes certificates. The Public Lecture meets in person on Sunday for fifteen dollars, but does not issue certificates. Please note that a place is confirmed only after payment is processed.
Situation 2
Situation: You arrive at a station at 9:45 p.m. and need a step-free journey directly to Southbank Hotel before 10:30 p.m.
Q22. Which transport option should the traveler choose?
- A. The local train.
- B. The airport express bus.
- C. The hotel shuttle.
- D. The city minibus.
読み上げ用アナウンス：The local train leaves at ten, but the station lift is unavailable tonight. The airport express bus leaves at ten ten and has step-free boarding, although it stops fifteen minutes on foot from Southbank Hotel. The hotel shuttle departs at ten fifteen, offers step-free boarding, and stops at the hotel entrance. A city minibus passes the hotel at ten forty and has three entrance steps. Travelers using the hotel shuttle should meet near the western information desk.
Situation 3
Situation: You have reserved a university archive tour for 9:30 a.m. You have the email and a photo ID.
Q23. Where should the visitor go first?
- A. The north security entrance with both documents.
- B. The gallery entrance at ten.
- C. The main reading desk without identification.
- D. Any open campus building.
読み上げ用アナウンス：Archive-tour guests must report to the north security entrance from nine fifteen with their booking email and photo identification. The main library doors open at nine thirty, but the reception desk there is only for ordinary readers. The university gallery opens at ten through the western entrance. Large bags must be stored in lockers before the archive tour. Participants should not assume that the main library desk can verify a tour reservation.
Situation 4
Situation: You must collect a printed conference poster Thursday evening. Your institution will reimburse at most $50 only with a dated receipt.
Q24. Which service meets the institution’s rules?
- A. ExpressPrint.
- B. ScreenRental.
- C. PosterWorld.
- D. CampusPress.
読み上げ用アナウンス：ExpressPrint can prepare the poster for forty dollars by Thursday evening but issues only an undated payment message. CampusPress charges forty-eight dollars and provides Thursday-evening collection with a dated receipt. PosterWorld offers a dated receipt and Thursday collection but charges fifty-five dollars. ScreenRental costs thirty dollars but provides a digital display rather than a printed poster. Check both the financial limit and format before placing an order.
Situation 5
Situation: You need a free online parent information session starting after 6:30 p.m., with live captions and time to ask questions.
Q25. Which session should the parent attend?
- A. Monday at 6:00 p.m.
- B. Wednesday at 7:00 p.m.
- C. Thursday at 7:00 p.m.
- D. Saturday in person.
読み上げ用アナウンス：Monday’s online orientation starts at six and includes captions and questions. Wednesday’s free online session begins at seven, offers live captions, and reserves time for parents to ask questions. Thursday’s free session starts at seven but does not provide captions. Saturday’s meeting includes captions but takes place only in person. Recordings may be available later, though recorded sessions do not permit live questions.
Part3の全解答・条件の除外理由
Q21 正答 B：Field Research Course. 和訳：日曜、対面、35ドル以下、修了証が必須。Field Researchは日曜対面32ドル・実習後に証明書。他はオンライン、土曜、証明書なし。 理由：曜日・対面・料金・修了証の4条件。
Q22 正答 C：The hotel shuttle. 和訳：21:45着、22:30前、段差なしでホテル直行。電車リフト故障、急行バス徒歩15分、ホテルシャトル22:15段差なし直行、ミニバス22:40・段差あり。 理由：22:15段差なし・ホテル入口直行。
Q23 正答 A：The north security entrance with both documents. 和訳：予約ツアーは9:15から北側警備入口、メールと写真付き身分証が必要。一般図書館の正面入口や10時の展示室とは別。 理由：north security entrance + two documents。
Q24 正答 D：CampusPress. 和訳：木曜夕方の印刷ポスター・50ドル以下・日付入り領収書。CampusPress48ドルだけ適合。 理由：印刷、日時、48ドル、日付入り領収書。
Q25 正答 B：Wednesday at 7:00 p.m. 和訳：18:30より後、無料オンライン、字幕、質問。水曜19時だけ全条件。月曜18時、木曜字幕なし、土曜対面。 理由：水曜は時間・方法・字幕・質問の全条件が揃う。
Part4｜インタビュー2問
Q26. What is the researcher’s view of taking action with incomplete evidence?
- A. Government action is never justified before all research ends.
- B. Emergency measures automatically prove long-term effectiveness.
- C. Temporary action may be reasonable if uncertainty and monitoring are made clear.
- D. Review dates should be omitted to avoid confusion.
Q27. What does the researcher recommend including with public claims?
- A. What was measured, what remains uncertain, and what decision is still open.
- B. Only the number of downloads.
- C. Predictions presented as established results.
- D. Technical terms without explanation.
インタビュー全文台本
Interviewer: You study how people interpret public research. Why can a clear-looking report still create misunderstanding?
Researcher: A short explanation may remove qualifications that matter. Consider a fictional city’s survey in which some volunteers report better outcomes after a program. Unless we know how participants were selected and what else changed, the observation alone does not prove that the program caused the improvement.
Interviewer: Should governments avoid acting until every uncertainty is resolved?
Researcher: Not necessarily. During an emergency, a temporary measure with careful monitoring may be reasonable. But officials should distinguish that provisional decision from a claim that the measure has already been proven effective. They should explain when the decision will be reviewed.
Interviewer: Many people dislike complex caveats. How can researchers communicate limitations without losing their audience?
Researcher: They can identify one or two limitations that materially affect the conclusion. For example, they might say that the trial involved only a small group or that staff training happened at the same time. That is easier to understand than a long list of technical terms.
Interviewer: Does the number of downloads show whether a report succeeded?
Researcher: It indicates reach, not comprehension. A downloaded document may never be read, and a short briefing used by a small group of community workers might be more influential. We need questions about understanding and practical application, as well as attention to people who could not access the report.
Interviewer: What is your most important recommendation?
Researcher: Every major public claim should briefly state what was measured, what remains uncertain, and what decision is still open. That helps people use evidence responsibly without pretending that uncertainty makes research worthless.
インタビューの段落別要点訳
要点1：研究者は短い報告で重要な限定条件を省く危険を指摘。自発的参加者の改善は選択過程や同時期の変化を確認しなければ因果を証明しない。
要点2：全不確実性の解消まで行政が行動停止する必要はないが、緊急の暫定措置と証明済みの効果は分け、見直し時期を明記する。
要点3：不確実性は標本の少なさや研修の同時実施など、本質的な1〜2点を平易に示す。
要点4：ダウンロード数は到達を表し理解は表さない。利用・理解と非利用者のアクセス障壁を評価すべき。
要点5：大きな主張には測ったこと、未確定なこと、未決定のことを簡潔に示すべき。
Part4の正答・根拠
Q26 正答 C：Temporary action may be reasonable if uncertainty and monitoring are made clear. temporary measure with monitoring may be reasonable。
Q27 正答 A：What was measured, what remains uncertain, and what decision is still open. what was measured, uncertain, decision open。
全27問の解答早見表
Q1：C ／ Q2：A ／ Q3：D ／ Q4：B ／ Q5：C ／ Q6：A ／ Q7：D ／ Q8：A ／ Q9：B ／ Q10：C ／ Q11：B ／ Q12：C ／ Q13：A ／ Q14：D ／ Q15：C ／ Q16：A ／ Q17：D ／ Q18：B ／ Q19：A ／ Q20：C ／ Q21：B ／ Q22：C ／ Q23：A ／ Q24：D ／ Q25：B ／ Q26：C ／ Q27：A
復習で確認すること
- 申請受信と参加確定を混同しない。
- 試行・計画・正式承認を区別する。
- 『数が増えた』と『成果が改善した』を混同しない。
- 数字だけでなく対象や測定方法を確認する。
- 次の未使用の公式音源で1回聴取の能力を検証する。
よくある質問
この教材で録音音声は流れますか？
録音音声は付属しません。英文台本を他者や端末で読み上げてもらい、初回は台本を隠します。実際の英検音源は公式過去問をご利用ください。
英検1級Listeningは何問ですか？
現行公式出題内訳は10・10・5・2の計27問です。本教材も同じ内訳ですが、英文はすべて独自に作成しました。
次に学ぶ教材
聞き取り後の判断・条件整理の個別練習については慶英会の最大1か月無料体験・学習相談をご覧ください。
公式情報
全台本・架空の公共機関・全27問・和訳と解答は慶英会の独自制作です。公式問題や音声の転載ではありません。
最大1か月完全無料体験・学習相談受付中
最大1か月の完全無料体験をご案内
学校教材・学力・目標に合わせた個別指導
入塾前に授業の進め方や講師との相性をお確かめください。
学校英語・定期テスト・英検の学習相談にも対応します。
保護者様の教育相談も無料で承ります。
1.学年 2. 学習目標 3.体験ご希望をお送りください。
体験の期間・回数・担当講師・日程は、ご希望と受付状況を確認してご案内します。
慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級。中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門としています。塾長の経歴・指導方針を確認する