慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門とするオンライン個別指導塾です。塾長紹介
英検1級Listening無料教材・慶英会オリジナル第41セット。Part1会話10問、Part2説明文10問、Part3 Real-Life5問、Part4インタビュー2問の計27問・全108択を新たに制作。全英文台本、日本語要点訳、正答の根拠を掲載します。学校・科学・自治体・交通・公開許諾などの複雑な条件を聞き分ける演習です。
英検協会の1級Listeningは会話10・説明文10・Real-Life5・インタビュー2問で、放送は各1回です（英検協会公式試験形式）。このページに録音音声は付属しません。英語読み上げ機能や読み上げ役を使い、最初は台本を隠して回答してください。実際の本試験のスピードは英検協会の過去問音声も併用します。
続きの無料教材：Listening第42セット｜独自27問・108択と全英文台本。初見で解いた後、正答根拠と誤答の理由まで確認してください。
リスニング27問の練習手順
- Part1は最終決定、暫定情報、測定条件の違いに注意する。
- Part2は報告の件数と実際の成果を区別し、専門家が述べる制約を聞き取る。
- Part3は時刻・設備・必要な許諾・締切などをすべて満たす案を選ぶ。
- Part4はインタビュアーの質問と答えの重要な限定を対応させる。
- 解答後に英文台本を確認し、翌日と7日後にもう一度台本を隠して聴く。
Part1｜独自会話10問
Q1
Question: What will the passengers check?
- A. Only the color of the app.
- B. Whether every bus is electric.
- C. The location and walking time to the temporary stop.
- D. A guarantee that the bus can never be delayed.
会話台本：Woman: The city’s new bus app says our route is on time. Man: But the temporary stop has moved two streets away, and walking there takes another eight minutes. Woman: Then a correct arrival time on the screen does not guarantee we’ll catch the bus. We should check the new stop location before leaving.
Q2
Question: What will the school do first?
- A. Complete the required instrument-specific orientation.
- B. Let experienced students skip every safety rule.
- C. Cancel science lessons permanently.
- D. Use the instrument without checking controls.
会話台本：Man: The school science club has borrowed a battery-testing instrument. Woman: Have the students completed the safety briefing? Man: Not all of them. Some participated in last year’s workshop. Woman: This instrument has different controls. Let’s arrange the required orientation before allowing anyone to operate it.
Q3
Question: What is the immediate concern?
- A. The town has no shelters.
- B. Every translation is guaranteed accurate.
- C. There are too many languages on the sign.
- D. The translation may confuse a safe destination with a route.
会話台本：Woman: The town’s flood notice was translated into three languages. Man: Good, but one version describes the temporary shelter as a route out of the town. Woman: That’s a serious difference. We need the emergency office and a qualified language reviewer to check the instruction before distribution.
Q4
Question: Why will the man check the agreement?
- A. The library is closing permanently.
- B. Access rights may not include public redistribution.
- C. All articles are in the public domain.
- D. PDFs can never be read on terminals.
会話台本：Man: The library bought digital magazine licenses, so we can email articles to everyone, right? Woman: Not necessarily. The agreement permits reading through approved terminals but restricts redistribution. Man: Then I’ll check the license before placing PDFs on the public course website.
Q5
Question: What will the organizers compare?
- A. Total usable life and ongoing support costs.
- B. Only how many devices have blue cases.
- C. The supplier’s logo size.
- D. A guarantee that no device needs repairs.
会話台本：Woman: The workshop’s refurbished computers are cheaper to purchase. Man: Do their prices include battery replacement and security support? Woman: The supplier offers only six months of updates, while the other proposal includes three years. Man: Then let’s compare lifetime costs before choosing the lower initial price.
Q6
Question: What is the likely next step?
- A. Ignore the submerged path.
- B. Move the trip to Saturday night without a guide.
- C. Consider the Sunday low-tide window and confirm support.
- D. Cancel all future field research.
会話台本：Man: The coastal field trip is scheduled for Saturday morning. Woman: The tide forecast indicates the access path will be submerged then. Man: Could we go in the afternoon? Woman: The science adviser says the next safe low-tide window is early Sunday. Let’s change the visit after confirming the guide.
Q7
Question: What weakens the population claim?
- A. All observations were deleted.
- B. No insects were recorded.
- C. Every site was inaccessible.
- D. Observation effort increased substantially.
会話台本：Woman: The community survey reports twice as many insect sightings as last year. Man: Did the volunteers observe for the same number of hours? Woman: No, the new team spent three times as long outside. Man: Then the sighting count needs adjustment before anyone claims a population increase.
Q8
Question: What must be corrected?
- A. Every grant must be canceled.
- B. Amendments should not automatically be counted as new awards.
- C. All figures must be hidden.
- D. Contract revisions are illegal.
会話台本：Man: The city has a list of grant recipients, but the total exceeds the number of contracts. Woman: Did the database count contract amendments as separate awards? Man: Yes. Woman: Then we need to separate new grants from revisions before publishing the final count.
Q9
Question: What remains to be addressed?
- A. Only the number of spectators.
- B. The pool’s advertising budget.
- C. Changing-room access and the safety of the pool lift.
- D. The design of the building’s roof.
会話台本：Woman: The community pool has a step-free entrance now. Man: Can visitors using wheelchairs access the changing rooms and water safely? Woman: Some changing-room doors are too narrow, and the lift into the water is awaiting inspection. Man: Then the entrance alone doesn’t prove the facility is fully accessible.
Q10
Question: What will the museum do?
- A. Label the claimed origin as unverified pending evidence.
- B. Delete every item in the collection.
- C. Claim that all unsigned notes are genuine.
- D. Publish the village as a confirmed fact.
会話台本：Man: The museum described the sculpture as originating in a particular village. Woman: Is that stated in the original donation record? Man: No, it came from an unsigned note written decades later. Woman: We should mark the location as unverified and seek more evidence rather than present it as certain.
Part2｜独自説明文5題・10問
Automated corrections in local news archives
説明文台本：A fictional local newspaper has introduced software to help identify factual inconsistencies in old digital articles. Editors hope that automated checks will detect mismatched dates, duplicated photographs and numerical errors in stories that remain searchable for years. The first report celebrated the number of possible mistakes flagged by the software. However, journalists soon found that some warnings reflected legitimate differences between a publication date and the date of an event. Others involved figures later corrected by public agencies. The newspaper decided that a human editor should examine important flags, retain earlier versions and publish a clear correction history. Its policy also distinguishes routine spelling changes from revisions that materially affect meaning. Managers will evaluate verified corrections, time spent reviewing false alarms and whether readers can understand what changed. The goal is a reliable historical record rather than the highest possible automated warning count.
Q11
Why do some automated flags require human review?
- A. Every flag reveals a fabricated story.
- B. All old articles have the same publication date.
- C. Publication dates and event dates can legitimately differ.
- D. The newspaper has prohibited corrections.
Q12
What will the newspaper evaluate?
- A. Only the number of warnings generated.
- B. Only its online advertising income.
- C. Only the age of its website.
- D. Verified corrections and understandable revision histories.
Wildlife crossings and traffic changes
説明文台本：A fictional transport department installed fencing and a small wildlife underpass near a highway where animal collisions had been reported. Cameras soon showed several mammals using the crossing, encouraging officials to announce that the project had succeeded. Ecologists, however, pointed out that photographs alone do not prove fewer collisions or healthier wildlife populations. Animals may have used the area before the underpass was installed, and seasonal movement patterns can change detection rates. Fencing can also deteriorate, directing animals back onto dangerous roads. The department plans to compare standardized camera observations with collision records and habitat conditions across multiple seasons. Local residents want road-safety information, while conservation groups are interested in whether different species benefit. Maintenance expenses will be included in the evaluation, since an attractive structure offers little value if damaged fencing is not repaired.
Q13
Why do wildlife photographs not prove the project’s overall success?
- A. They do not alone establish changes in collisions or populations.
- B. Every animal uses the crossing only once.
- C. The cameras were never installed.
- D. No vehicles travel on the highway.
Q14
Which additional evidence is planned?
- A. Only the color of the fence.
- B. Collision records, habitat and comparable observations over time.
- C. Only tourist comments.
- D. A guarantee that all animals avoid the road.
Green hydrogen and local electricity demand
説明文台本：An industrial cooperative is considering producing hydrogen using electricity from renewable sources. Supporters hope that the fuel could serve industrial processes that are difficult to electrify directly. Early estimates emphasize the amount of hydrogen that new equipment could produce under ideal conditions. Energy specialists caution that production requires electricity and water, and the environmental benefits depend on when and where power is generated. If an electrolyzer draws scarce electricity from a grid still dependent on high-emission sources, a simple label describing the hydrogen as green may be misleading. Storage, transport and equipment maintenance create additional costs. The cooperative is planning a small pilot that records actual electricity supply, water use, usable hydrogen, operational interruptions and lifecycle emissions. Local residents are concerned about competition for water during dry periods. Managers intend to examine whether the project provides reliable industrial value without shifting unacceptable resource burdens to other users.
Q15
What may weaken the environmental claim about hydrogen?
- A. Renewable electricity can never be used.
- B. The equipment requires no water.
- C. Actual power sources and production conditions may differ from favorable assumptions.
- D. Transport has no energy costs.
Q16
What will the cooperative monitor?
- A. Only the number of workers hired.
- B. Only hydrogen’s color label.
- C. Only the size of new equipment.
- D. Actual energy, water, hydrogen output and full emissions.
Community repair workshops and volunteer safety
説明文台本：A group of public libraries proposed repair workshops for small household appliances. Volunteers would help residents understand why common devices fail and whether some components could be replaced. Supporters hoped to reduce waste and teach practical skills. Safety officers warned that mains electricity, damaged lithium batteries and equipment with missing specifications require specialized precautions. An item brought to a workshop is not necessarily safe to repair, and the number of attempted repairs is not a meaningful success measure. The libraries introduced preliminary screening and procedures for referring risky devices to qualified professionals. They also considered accessible appointment times for residents unable to attend weekday sessions. A pilot will measure successful safe repairs, user learning, referral outcomes, staff time and total costs. Organizers emphasize that responsible repair includes knowing when not to proceed with a particular item.
Q17
What limits the repair program?
- A. Some equipment presents risks requiring specialist intervention.
- B. Every device can be repaired safely by volunteers.
- C. The libraries have permanently closed.
- D. All users attend identical sessions.
Q18
How will successful workshops be assessed?
- A. By the number of repair attempts alone.
- B. Safe repairs, learning, referrals and operating costs.
- C. Only the number of donated posters.
- D. By a guarantee of zero future failures.
Citizen budgeting and participation bias
説明文台本：A fictional city invited residents to rank proposals for improving neighborhood parks and pedestrian streets. Online participation was high, and officials initially interpreted the large number of votes as proof that the results reflected the whole population. Researchers warned that people with limited internet access, irregular work hours or little familiarity with local politics might have been underrepresented. A proposal supported by many active voters was not automatically the highest priority for residents who could not participate. The city introduced paper voting points, outreach through community organizations and explanations of full construction and maintenance costs. Officials also planned to compare the demographic characteristics of participants with the neighborhoods affected. Critics worried that adding consultation could delay projects, but planners argued that early attention to excluded groups might prevent expensive mistakes. The pilot will assess fair participation, practical outcomes and public costs rather than vote totals alone.
Q19
Why can many online votes be misleading?
- A. Every resident has voted.
- B. Voting has been banned.
- C. People unable to participate online may be underrepresented.
- D. The proposals have all been implemented.
Q20
What change is proposed?
- A. Allow only existing online voters.
- B. Stop sharing maintenance costs.
- C. Eliminate every neighborhood meeting.
- D. Offer additional ways to participate and compare who is represented.
Part3｜Real-Life5問
Q21
Situation: You need to collect river samples on Friday between 9 and 11 a.m. A licensed field supervisor and a permit for that river section are mandatory.
- A. Use Supervisor Mori from 9 to 11 despite the end time.
- B. Book Supervisor Tanaka and the Section A boat for Friday 9 to 11.
- C. Sample in Section B Friday without permission.
- D. Collect samples after the boat is returned.
放送台本：Field office: Supervisor Mori is available Friday 8 to 10 a.m. The permit for Section A covers Friday until noon. Supervisor Tanaka is available Friday 9 to noon and holds authorization for Section A. The sampling boat is available Friday 9 to 11 a.m. Section B’s permit is valid only on Saturday.
Q22
Situation: A public lecture for 20 attendees on Tuesday from 4 to 5:15 p.m. needs step-free access, an interpreter and live captions.
- A. Use North without captions.
- B. Begin at 6 p.m.
- C. Book South and the interpreter by Monday noon for Tuesday 4 to 5:15.
- D. Use South without confirming interpretation.
放送台本：Venue notice: Auditorium North seats thirty and is step-free, but has no internet connection for captions. Auditorium South seats twenty-five, is step-free and has captioning equipment, and is available Tuesday from 3 to 6 p.m. The interpreter is free Tuesday from 3:30 to 5:30 p.m. South bookings close Monday noon.
Q23
Situation: Your institution needs to transport a fragile historic instrument by Thursday 10 a.m., including vibration monitoring and signed handling records.
- A. Use standard delivery.
- B. Use express without monitoring.
- C. Send the object on Friday.
- D. Book conservation delivery by Tuesday noon.
放送台本：Transport offers: Standard parcels collected Tuesday arrive Thursday after 4 p.m. Express parcels arrive Wednesday evening but have no vibration monitoring. Specialist conservation delivery booked by Tuesday noon arrives Thursday by 8 a.m. with vibration data and signed handling records. Courier pickup is not available on weekends.
Q24
Situation: A commuter must reach the regional hospital by 9 a.m. on Monday. The direct bus is suspended, and the alternative ferry lands at 8:20 a.m.
- A. Take the 8:20 ferry and the 8:30 shuttle.
- B. Take the 8:50 ferry and walk.
- C. Take the 8:50 ferry and the 9:10 shuttle.
- D. Wait for the direct bus that is suspended.
放送台本：Transport notice: Ferry arrivals are at 8:20 a.m. and 8:50 a.m. Monday. The hospital shuttle leaves the ferry terminal at 8:30 and 9:10 a.m.; the journey takes twenty minutes. The walking route from the terminal takes fifty minutes. The 8:20 ferry connects with the 8:30 shuttle; the 8:50 ferry does not reach the shuttle in time for 9.
Q25
Situation: A training video uses a recognizable community speaker’s voice, and you want to publish it on an unrestricted website next week.
- A. Publish under the teaching agreement.
- B. Obtain the public-release signature by Thursday 3 p.m.
- C. Post the voice clip after deleting the speaker’s name.
- D. Publish first and request permission later.
放送台本：Rights office: The current form authorizes private teaching and research storage only. A separate public-distribution release is available from the speaker’s authorized representative. Signed requests must be submitted by Thursday 3 p.m. Removing the written name does not necessarily make the voice anonymous.
Part4｜インタビュー2問
インタビュー英文台本：Interviewer: Your region is developing a community energy-storage program. Why would local organizations share batteries instead of buying their own? Director: Some buildings need backup power only occasionally, and a shared arrangement might reduce duplicated capacity. But the batteries still require maintenance and safe locations. Interviewer: Have the first results been encouraging? Director: We have installed several units, but installation figures alone tell us very little. We need to record how much useful electricity they actually deliver during interruptions and whether critical services remain available. Interviewer: Could the program lower electricity bills as well? Director: Possibly, if charging and discharging are coordinated carefully, but energy prices and demand change. We should not claim guaranteed savings from a short trial. Interviewer: How will you deal with neighborhoods that have different needs? Director: A clinic may require very reliable backup supply, while a community hall can tolerate a brief interruption. Some people also worry about fire safety and where equipment will be placed. Our design must reflect those differences. Interviewer: Would the system ever be operated automatically? Director: Routine scheduling can be automated, but qualified staff must remain responsible for safety checks, exceptional conditions and emergency procedures. Interviewer: What would justify expansion? Director: Evidence of dependable backup power, fair access and benefits that exceed the full cost of batteries, installation, training and replacement. A public dashboard with many colorful numbers is not enough.
Q26
Why does the director reject installation totals as proof of success?
- A. Installation guarantees that all costs fall.
- B. Every building requires identical backup power.
- C. Practical energy delivery and service continuity must be measured.
- D. The program has no emergency purpose.
Q27
What will determine wider adoption?
- A. Only the number of dashboards created.
- B. Only the initial purchase price.
- C. A guarantee that energy markets will never change.
- D. Dependable supply, fairness and lifecycle benefits relative to costs.
全27問の解答・日本語要点訳・根拠
Part1｜会話10問
Q1：C The location and walking time to the temporary stop.。日本語要点：到着予測が正しくても仮停留所までの徒歩時間が必要。根拠：walking to the moved stop takes additional time
Q2：A Complete the required instrument-specific orientation.。日本語要点：以前の経験だけでなく当該機器の安全講習が必要。根拠：different controls and required orientation
Q3：D The translation may confuse a safe destination with a route.。日本語要点：避難場所と避難経路を混同する誤訳を配布前に訂正する。根拠：shelter described as route out
Q4：B Access rights may not include public redistribution.。日本語要点：端末閲覧は許可でもPDFの一般公開は別の許諾。根拠：licensed reading does not authorize redistribution
Q5：A Total usable life and ongoing support costs.。日本語要点：初期費用だけでなく更新と電池の寿命を比較する。根拠：six months versus three years of support
Q6：C Consider the Sunday low-tide window and confirm support.。日本語要点：土曜午後ではなく日曜早朝の安全な干潮時刻を検討する。根拠：safe low tide early Sunday
Q7：D Observation effort increased substantially.。日本語要点：観測時間が3倍になったため目撃数を単純比較できない。根拠：three times as many hours
Q8：B Amendments should not automatically be counted as new awards.。日本語要点：契約の変更記録と新たな助成採択を区別する。根拠：amendments counted as awards
Q9：C Changing-room access and the safety of the pool lift.。日本語要点：入口の段差だけでなく更衣室と入水用リフトの安全が必要。根拠：narrow doors and lift awaiting inspection
Q10：A Label the claimed origin as unverified pending evidence.。日本語要点：署名のない後年のメモだけでは出所を確定できない。根拠：unsigned later note does not establish origin
Part2｜5篇の説明文と10問
Automated corrections in local news archives・日本語要旨
地方紙の過去記事の自動校閲は日付の違いや数値を検出するが誤警告もある。人による検査と版履歴が必要で、警告件数ではなく正しい訂正を評価する。
Q11：C Publication dates and event dates can legitimately differ.。根拠：記事の発表日と出来事の日は違い得る。
Q12：D Verified corrections and understandable revision histories.。根拠：確認された訂正と読者の理解を評価する。
Wildlife crossings and traffic changes・日本語要旨
野生動物用地下道に動物が映るだけでは事故削減や生態系の改善とは断定できない。衝突記録・季節・フェンス保守の長期測定が必要。
Q13：A They do not alone establish changes in collisions or populations.。根拠：写真は事故削減と個体数改善の証明ではない。
Q14：B Collision records, habitat and comparable observations over time.。根拠：衝突・生息地・長期観測を組み合わせる。
Green hydrogen and local electricity demand・日本語要旨
水素の製造可能量と実際の低排出効果は別。電力の発電源・水利用・輸送・保守を含む総合評価が必要。
Q15：C Actual power sources and production conditions may differ from favorable assumptions.。根拠：実際に使う電力の由来と総資源費用が問題。
Q16：D Actual energy, water, hydrogen output and full emissions.。根拠：実際のエネルギー・水・排出を比較。
Community repair workshops and volunteer safety・日本語要旨
図書館の家電修理会は学習と廃棄削減に役立つ可能性があるが損傷電池や電源回路は危険。修理成功・安全・専門職紹介を評価する。
Q17：A Some equipment presents risks requiring specialist intervention.。根拠：危険な機器は専門家に回す必要がある。
Q18：B Safe repairs, learning, referrals and operating costs.。根拠：安全に直った成果と学習・費用が重要。
Citizen budgeting and participation bias・日本語要旨
住民参加型予算の投票数が多くてもオンライン利用できない住民は漏れ得る。紙・地域支援を増やし、参加者の偏りと実際の改善成果を評価する。
Q19：C People unable to participate online may be underrepresented.。根拠：参加できない住民の意見が偏りに現れる。
Q20：D Offer additional ways to participate and compare who is represented.。根拠：紙・地域組織などを通じ参加格差を減らす。
Part3｜Real-Life5問
Q21：B Book Supervisor Tanaka and the Section A boat for Friday 9 to 11.。日本語要点：9〜11時に監督者・区間A許可・船のすべてが揃う。根拠：Tanaka available nine to noon and permit A valid Friday
Q22：C Book South and the interpreter by Monday noon for Tuesday 4 to 5:15.。日本語要点：字幕設備・段差なし・20人・通訳・時間を満たす南ホール。根拠：South has captions and interpreter covers four to five fifteen
Q23：D Book conservation delivery by Tuesday noon.。日本語要点：木曜8時に届き振動記録と取扱署名もある専門輸送。根拠：specialist delivery Thursday eight with logs
Q24：A Take the 8:20 ferry and the 8:30 shuttle.。日本語要点：8:20着の船と8:30発の20分シャトルなら8:50に病院へ到着。根拠：shuttle arrives before nine
Q25：B Obtain the public-release signature by Thursday 3 p.m.。日本語要点：授業利用と不特定多数への公開は別許可で木曜15時までの署名が必要。根拠：separate public release
Part4｜インタビュー2問
複数施設で共有する蓄電池の計画では、設置台数だけで停電時の実際の給電・公共サービス継続は分からない。施設ごとの電力需要、安全性、操作の責任、調達から交換までの費用を測定する。
Q26：C Practical energy delivery and service continuity must be measured.。日本語要点：機器を置いただけで実際の給電や事業継続は測れない。根拠：need useful electricity during interruptions
Q27：D Dependable supply, fairness and lifecycle benefits relative to costs.。日本語要点：信頼できるバックアップと公平性・全費用の比較。根拠：dependable supply and full lifecycle costs
聞き間違いを防ぐ復習
- 音の問題：台本の語を句ごとに区切り、弱音や連結を音読する。
- 意味の問題：might・until・however・rather thanのような条件表現に注目する。
- Real-Life：期限、所要時間、設備、許可のすべてを照合する。
- 説明文：観測者や測器が変わったら同じ数字でも意味が変わることを確認する。
よくある質問
英検1級Listeningは何問ですか？
公式では会話10問・説明文10問・Real-Life5問・インタビュー2問の合計27問です。
録音音声を再生できますか？
本記事には録音ファイルがありません。慶英会独自台本を読み上げて使用し、本番の話速は英検協会の公式音声で確認してください。
初見と答え合わせで何を変えればよいですか？
初見は英文台本を見ず1回で解答し、答え合わせでは台本と解答根拠を繰り返し読み直します。
関連する無料教材
参考にした公式情報
すべての問題・英文台本・選択肢・正答・日本語要旨は慶英会独自制作の非公式教材です。記載の施設・輸送・許可条件などは架空の練習設定です。
最大1か月完全無料体験・学習相談受付中
最大1か月の完全無料体験をご案内
学校教材・学力・目標に合わせた個別指導
入塾前に授業の進め方や講師との相性をお確かめください。
学校英語・定期テスト・英検の学習相談にも対応します。
保護者様の教育相談も無料で承ります。
1.学年 2. 学習目標 3.体験ご希望をお送りください。
体験の期間・回数・担当講師・日程は、ご希望と受付状況を確認してご案内します。
慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級。中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門としています。塾長の経歴・指導方針を確認する