慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級
中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門とするオンライン個別指導塾です。塾長紹介
結論：英検1級の二次面接では、常に賛成・常に反対の二択にせず、どの条件なら一部賛成できるか、例外なら何をするかを説明する回答が有効です。慶英会独自の28問に、英語模範回答28本と日本語解説を付けました。実際の面接カードの問題や公式模範回答ではありません。
回答の3段階
Concession：To some extent, …（一部を認める）。Condition：This is especially true when …（成立する条件を述べる）。Position：If …, I would instead …（例外時の行動を示す）。条件によって結論が変わることは弱さではなく、主張の範囲を明確にする方法です。
独自28問｜すべてに模範回答・和訳の要点
問1｜Are higher taxes always effective in changing behavior?
模範回答：To some extent, higher taxes can discourage harmful consumption. This is especially true when people have access to affordable alternatives. However, if low-income households face a disproportionate burden, I would instead combine the tax with targeted relief. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：代替手段と所得への負担を考慮する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問2｜Is remote work better for all employees?
模範回答：To some extent, remote work can improve employees’ work-life balance. This is especially true when tasks can be done independently. However, if physical equipment or close teamwork is essential, I would instead retain some on-site working days. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：仕事内容によって働き方を分ける。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問3｜Should all public services become digital?
模範回答：To some extent, digital government services can save time. This is especially true when people have reliable Internet access and support. However, if some residents struggle with online procedures, I would instead keep staffed service counters. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：高齢者やデジタル弱者への対応を残す。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問4｜Is free university education always fair?
模範回答：To some extent, free university tuition can improve access. This is especially true when admissions and support are equitable. However, if subsidies mainly benefit already advantaged students, I would instead target financial aid to those most in need. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：無償化の恩恵が誰に届くかを見る。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問5｜Should governments always subsidize renewable energy?
模範回答：To some extent, renewable subsidies can speed up clean-energy investment. This is especially true when funding is transparent and temporary. However, if a project would proceed without public support, I would instead redirect funds to more urgent needs. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：補助金の追加性と期限を検証する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問6｜Is tourism always beneficial to local communities?
模範回答：To some extent, tourism can bring revenue to communities. This is especially true when visitor numbers remain manageable. However, if crowding damages local residents’ quality of life, I would instead introduce limits and better transport planning. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：観光収入と住民生活の両方を評価する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問7｜Should companies always allow flexible work?
模範回答：To some extent, flexible schedules can help employee retention. This is especially true when staff can coordinate key tasks. However, if the service requires fixed coverage hours, I would instead offer predictable shifts instead. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：柔軟性と必要な人員配置を両立する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問8｜Is regulation always the best way to protect consumers?
模範回答：To some extent, regulation can protect consumers from misleading products. This is especially true when rules address a demonstrated harm. However, if compliance demands exceed the likely benefit, I would instead simplify procedures and enforce existing protections. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：規制の効果と小規模事業者の負担を見る。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問9｜Should museums always offer free admission?
模範回答：To some extent, free admission can broaden museum access. This is especially true when public funding covers conservation costs. However, if the museum cannot safely maintain its collection, I would instead offer discounts or free days. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：アクセス改善と資料保存の費用を比較する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問10｜Is preventive healthcare always cost-effective?
模範回答：To some extent, preventive care may reduce some future health problems. This is especially true when programs reach people at demonstrable risk. However, if screening creates unnecessary interventions, I would instead use evidence-based targeted programs. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：検査の利益と過剰介入の害を評価する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問11｜Should schools completely ban smartphones?
模範回答：To some extent, smartphone restrictions can support classroom concentration. This is especially true when schools teach responsible digital use as well. However, if devices are needed for a legitimate learning activity, I would instead allow supervised educational exceptions. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：全面禁止と授業利用の例外を分ける。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問12｜Is international exchange beneficial for every student?
模範回答：To some extent, international exchange can broaden perspectives. This is especially true when students receive preparation and support. However, if participants face serious financial or language barriers, I would instead offer accessible virtual or local alternatives. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：参加環境による学習成果の違いを認める。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問13｜Should public transportation always be subsidized?
模範回答：To some extent, transport subsidies can support access to jobs. This is especially true when reliable services connect essential destinations. However, if buses rarely run or routes are unsuitable, I would instead improve service frequency before cutting fares. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：運賃だけでなく交通の供給量を考慮する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問14｜Is open public data always beneficial?
模範回答：To some extent, open data can help people scrutinize decisions. This is especially true when personal information is properly protected. However, if released records could expose sensitive details, I would instead publish aggregated or anonymized data. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：透明性とプライバシーの均衡を考える。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問15｜Should companies disclose all environmental risks?
模範回答：To some extent, disclosing environmental risks can improve accountability. This is especially true when companies can describe risks accurately and clearly. However, if some details would reveal personal or security-sensitive information, I would instead redact sensitive material while reporting material risks. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：重要リスクの開示と機密保護を分ける。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問16｜Is project-based learning better than traditional instruction?
模範回答：To some extent, project-based learning can build problem-solving skills. This is especially true when students already have essential foundational knowledge. However, if a course requires systematic basic practice, I would instead combine projects with explicit instruction. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：探究型学習と基礎技能指導を併用する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問17｜Should cities always restrict private cars?
模範回答：To some extent, restrictions on private cars can reduce congestion. This is especially true when public transport provides reliable alternatives. However, if people with disabilities lack accessible options, I would instead allow exemptions and improve public transit. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：移動困難な人への代替手段を確保する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問18｜Is historic preservation always worth the cost?
模範回答：To some extent, historic preservation can protect cultural heritage. This is especially true when buildings have significant value and a viable maintenance plan. However, if the cost prevents essential safety repairs, I would instead prioritize urgent repairs and phased conservation. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：文化的価値と改修費の優先順位を区別する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問19｜Should governments always prioritize long-term policies?
模範回答：To some extent, long-term policy planning can provide stability. This is especially true when future benefits and risks can be evaluated. However, if an emergency requires immediate intervention, I would instead fund urgent relief without abandoning longer goals. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：長期視点と緊急対応を二者択一にしない。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問20｜Is remote learning suitable for all students?
模範回答：To some extent, remote learning can preserve educational access. This is especially true when students have devices and adult support. However, if hands-on teaching or face-to-face assistance is necessary, I would instead provide in-person learning options. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：遠隔授業が合う状況と合わない状況を区別する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問21｜Should businesses bear most environmental costs?
模範回答：To some extent, businesses should bear costs linked to the harm they cause. This is especially true when responsibility can be assigned fairly. However, if small firms cannot afford sudden compliance expenses, I would instead phase in changes with proportionate support. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：原因者負担と中小企業の実行可能性を両立する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問22｜Is financial education enough to prevent debt problems?
模範回答：To some extent, financial education can improve decision-making. This is especially true when learners can apply it to real choices. However, if families face structural income shortages, I would instead pair education with accessible advice and support. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：教育だけで債務問題が解消するとは限らない。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問23｜Should governments always intervene in housing markets?
模範回答：To some extent, public intervention can improve housing affordability. This is especially true when there is clear evidence of market failure. However, if a measure discourages urgently needed construction, I would instead adjust supply rules alongside targeted assistance. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：家賃負担と住宅供給への影響を評価する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問24｜Is stricter regulation always safer?
模範回答：To some extent, stricter safety rules can prevent serious harm. This is especially true when the requirements address known risks. However, if the added paperwork delays urgent repairs, I would instead simplify compliance while preserving safeguards. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：規則の厳格化だけが安全とは限らない。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問25｜Should universities require internships?
模範回答：To some extent, internships can improve career exploration. This is especially true when placements offer supervision and meaningful work. However, if students cannot participate because of finances or disability, I would instead offer paid and accessible alternatives. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：実習の質と公平な参加機会を確保する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問26｜Is congestion pricing fair in every city?
模範回答：To some extent, congestion pricing can encourage public transport. This is especially true when affordable alternatives exist. However, if low-income commuters lack viable routes, I would instead offer discounts and improve transit first. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：交通選択肢の有無で公平性が変わる。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問27｜Should companies always reduce meetings?
模範回答：To some extent, fewer meetings can protect time for focused work. This is especially true when decisions are documented and responsibilities remain clear. However, if teams need frequent coordination for safety, I would instead keep essential briefings and shorten routine meetings. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：会議削減と安全な情報共有を両立する。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
問28｜Is digital access enough to replace physical services?
模範回答：To some extent, digital access can make services more convenient. This is especially true when users can complete tasks independently. However, if residents need physical assistance or accessible equipment, I would instead maintain face-to-face support. Therefore, I would not apply the same policy to every situation.
和訳・解説：オンライン化が対面支援を不要にするわけではない。部分的に認める対象を示し、成立条件と例外の場合の代替策まで答える。常に・全員にといった全称命題を無条件に肯定しない。
模範英文の使い方
各問についてモデルを読んだ後、最初の立場を逆にして答える練習も行います。たとえば「部分的に賛成」を「原則反対だが例外的に認める」へ変え、理由と条件を独自に説明してください。制限時間を決め、質問に直接答えることを優先します。
FAQ
Q. I agree to some extent だけで終わってもよいですか？ A. 何について、どの条件で認めるのかまで示す必要があります。
Q. 本文の主張は慶英会の公式見解ですか？ A. いいえ。社会問題を多角的に考えるための仮想的な英語回答例です。
Q. 模範回答をそのまま暗唱すべきですか？ A. 重要なのは論理構成を再現し、自分の立場で説明できることです。
関連教材・公式情報
英検1級面接・優先順位と証拠の独自28問｜英検1級面接・限定的な証拠への回答28問｜英検協会・試験内容
慶英会：最大1か月完全無料体験・学習相談
最大1か月完全無料体験・学習相談受付中
最大1か月の完全無料体験をご案内
学校教材・学力・目標に合わせた個別指導
入塾前に授業の進め方や講師との相性をお確かめください。
学校英語・定期テスト・英検の学習相談にも対応します。
保護者様の教育相談も無料で承ります。
1.学年 2. 学習目標 3.体験ご希望をお送りください。
体験の期間・回数・担当講師・日程は、ご希望と受付状況を確認してご案内します。
慶英会 塾長｜慶應義塾大学卒・英検1級。中高一貫校の学校英語・NEW TREASURE・英検対策を専門としています。塾長の経歴・指導方針を確認する